IMDb रेटिंग
5.8/10
2.9 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
एक सिंड्रेला कहानी, बर्फ के भारी जंगलों में नायिका सुंदर राजकुमार से मिलने के अपने सपने के लिए अपनी दुष्ट सौतेली मां के खिलाफ लड़ती है.एक सिंड्रेला कहानी, बर्फ के भारी जंगलों में नायिका सुंदर राजकुमार से मिलने के अपने सपने के लिए अपनी दुष्ट सौतेली मां के खिलाफ लड़ती है.एक सिंड्रेला कहानी, बर्फ के भारी जंगलों में नायिका सुंदर राजकुमार से मिलने के अपने सपने के लिए अपनी दुष्ट सौतेली मां के खिलाफ लड़ती है.
- पुरस्कार
- 2 जीत और कुल 2 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
There were only two things that I liked about this movie: the landscape and the horses.
But this does not save an otherwise soulless movie.
This is probably what you get when diversity and political correctness take precedence over acting skills and a decent script.
This entire movie is nothing but a sorry effort of a remake.
But this does not save an otherwise soulless movie.
This is probably what you get when diversity and political correctness take precedence over acting skills and a decent script.
This entire movie is nothing but a sorry effort of a remake.
Unfortunately this movie adds nothing to the original except a few forced modern additions like a kiss between two men and an black and white moral which turns out to not really be that modern or feminist after all. Imagine managing to make the 2021 female character less feminist than the original while trying to do the opposite? Little to no character development, bland soundtrack and costumes, the humor from the original is nowhere to be found.
The movie is despite this overall probably an enjoyable movie for kids.
The movie is despite this overall probably an enjoyable movie for kids.
I generally don't make reviews, but could not resist, because I like practically all the "cinderrella" variations out there. Including the Czech one.
90% of the dialogue and action is from the Czech version. All they attempted was to reshoot the old lines in a fresh way in fresh costumes in Norwegian surroundings. That's fine, I have no problem with that.
The problem is that the only actor able to deliver lines was Alfred. Even though that actor is a veteran, he was still struggling to do so in a way that conveyed a believable character. All the other characters were embarrassingly bad. Not a singel line had emotions or depth behind it. They were spoken as if they had not seen the script before, yet alone the old movie.
I cannot believe all the actors are that bad. So it has to boil down to the director. - A lack of experience from beginning to end.
There is no excuse for having an inexperienced bad director do this job, they knew it would sell well and they would turn a profit. So how could this happen? I really would like to know the decision making process behind it.
Lots of other bad stuff, like the reade music. Was the old music copyrighted? Remaking similar tunes was a horrible idea.. But all that is nothing compared to the delivery of the lines, the acting and theatre editing. Awful awful stuff.
2 stars for the horses and nature.
90% of the dialogue and action is from the Czech version. All they attempted was to reshoot the old lines in a fresh way in fresh costumes in Norwegian surroundings. That's fine, I have no problem with that.
The problem is that the only actor able to deliver lines was Alfred. Even though that actor is a veteran, he was still struggling to do so in a way that conveyed a believable character. All the other characters were embarrassingly bad. Not a singel line had emotions or depth behind it. They were spoken as if they had not seen the script before, yet alone the old movie.
I cannot believe all the actors are that bad. So it has to boil down to the director. - A lack of experience from beginning to end.
There is no excuse for having an inexperienced bad director do this job, they knew it would sell well and they would turn a profit. So how could this happen? I really would like to know the decision making process behind it.
Lots of other bad stuff, like the reade music. Was the old music copyrighted? Remaking similar tunes was a horrible idea.. But all that is nothing compared to the delivery of the lines, the acting and theatre editing. Awful awful stuff.
2 stars for the horses and nature.
I was a bit disappointed when I saw this in relation to the original from 1973. I do not think it was wise to have actors who were so different from the original. The humor was not quite there either. Maybe it would have been best if the country of origin had made this remake in English language?
There is in a way so much that is missing, that I do not think this will be a Christmas classic: p Sad since this could have been so much more: p.
There is in a way so much that is missing, that I do not think this will be a Christmas classic: p Sad since this could have been so much more: p.
I found this to be a alright adaptation of the story and adds little new with it. The story is your standard Cinderella version with a couple of differences to it. I do like how active Cinderella is with her horseback riding and knowing how to a bow. But it felt the movie could have given more development to her because she lacks any development and isn't that interesting. Even the romance between her and the prince isn't fully flesh out and doesn't have a chemistry between them. Speaking of the prince, he's pretty bland with little to offer of him and plays the standard prince you see in any adaptation. As for the stepmother, she mostly plays the typical stepmother you see in any adaptation and adds nothing to her. One thing that is different is that there's no fairy godmother in the adaptation, which is fine because it try something new with the source material. But how Cinderella got her wishes feels like a plot connivence when it happened.
One big positive is that the location and cinematography looks beautiful and amazing on the job the filmmakers put into the movie. It really looks gorgeous with it being in a snowy environment that gives some atmosphere to the movie and the different shots it presented here. Even the set design looks great inside current location of the movie like the castle looks great. I also like the music and dance sequence the movie presented since it executed pretty well.
The three wishes I wish to improve is to give the characters more development to them, have a better chemistry between Cinderella and the prince, and have the movie build with its new ideas.
One big positive is that the location and cinematography looks beautiful and amazing on the job the filmmakers put into the movie. It really looks gorgeous with it being in a snowy environment that gives some atmosphere to the movie and the different shots it presented here. Even the set design looks great inside current location of the movie like the castle looks great. I also like the music and dance sequence the movie presented since it executed pretty well.
The three wishes I wish to improve is to give the characters more development to them, have a better chemistry between Cinderella and the prince, and have the movie build with its new ideas.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThis is a Norwegian remake of Czech film Tri orísky pro Popelku (1973).
- गूफ़The reflex bow on the cover art is strung with the bowstring on the wrong side of the bow. No archer would ever make this mistake.
- कनेक्शनRemake of Tri orísky pro Popelku (1973)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Three Wishes for Cinderella?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Tres deseos para Cenicienta
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- NOK 3,80,00,000(अनुमानित)
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $53,52,917
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 27 मिनट
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें