IMDb रेटिंग
5.4/10
1.4 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
एक मां एक रूसी राजनयिक के साथ व्यसनी संबंध में पड़ जाती है, जिसके साथ उसकी कोई बात मेल नहीं खाती है.एक मां एक रूसी राजनयिक के साथ व्यसनी संबंध में पड़ जाती है, जिसके साथ उसकी कोई बात मेल नहीं खाती है.एक मां एक रूसी राजनयिक के साथ व्यसनी संबंध में पड़ जाती है, जिसके साथ उसकी कोई बात मेल नहीं खाती है.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 2 कुल नामांकन
Luc Bataini
- Clochard
- (as Luc Bataïni)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Eternal myth of extreme love between two persons unable to be together. This time the story-telling is refreshingly original without overacting and other art-house pretence.
The erotic scenes are many and illustrate the wild and animal nature of the passion.
The story is a lesson to the spouses stuck in the boredom.of peaceful family life: beware of the forest fire.
The erotic scenes are many and illustrate the wild and animal nature of the passion.
The story is a lesson to the spouses stuck in the boredom.of peaceful family life: beware of the forest fire.
Yes, the movie was slowly paced and the story was simple yet relatable. There was a lot of bed scenes, which given that Sergei Polunin was the love interest was not a bad thing in the least. Did I mention Sergei Polunin? Laetitia Dorsch was wonderful as well. If you can, watch this movie. Just make sure your kids aren't around lol.
A camera that is sensitive in the moments it should, such as: focusing on the skin, the sensation and sounds of the environment and the changes in the protagonist's emotions, it starts off intimate, suffocating when the romance is beginning and becomes more distant in moments of doubt, reflections of the protagonist, to corroborate the feminine point of view of the plot. Sex is present in the first half of the film, as expected from a lovers' film, but it seems mechanical and false to us who are watching, it only seems to make sense for the protagonist, who delights and misses it. I liked the idea of the protagonist being a university professor who teaches about literature and trying to create her novels, a contrast between reading about romance and experiencing them, which brings us a human reflection that even though she has knowledge about romantic novels and their endings, she She appears to have no regrets about her decision, she willingly embraces her choice, telling us that it is worth making "some" mistakes and feeling certain emotions.
The book (of the same name) that this film is based upon is only about 40 or 50 pages long and can be read in a couple of hours. The film adaption doesn't provide any narrator, so it's easy to be lost as to the point of particular scenes, e.g. The hairdresser scene is difficult to comprehend without the author's internal thoughts.
If you go in with the context of the author's emotional state and thoughts, the imagery in the film brings the text alive.
The author, Annie Ernaux, won the 2022 Nobel Prize in Literature. She bares her soul in her work, and that's why I wanted to see the film, and the result was worth watching.
If you go in with the context of the author's emotional state and thoughts, the imagery in the film brings the text alive.
The author, Annie Ernaux, won the 2022 Nobel Prize in Literature. She bares her soul in her work, and that's why I wanted to see the film, and the result was worth watching.
I must say that I didn't expect that I would watch more than 15 minutes of this movie.
Hence, I was pleasantly surprised that somehow the movie got me interested.
I'm a man.
This movie is essentially from a woman viewpoint. Perhaps it would therefore appeal to many women rather than men ?
Regardless, the central character actress got my attention into her spiralling descent into a highly addictive, highly dependent physical relationship.
It contrasts with her life which is being an intellectual , a lecturer at the University.
It also doesn't agree with her role as a single mother.
Good movie that shows how "love", or at least the perception of being in love, can lead to disaster.
Hence, I was pleasantly surprised that somehow the movie got me interested.
I'm a man.
This movie is essentially from a woman viewpoint. Perhaps it would therefore appeal to many women rather than men ?
Regardless, the central character actress got my attention into her spiralling descent into a highly addictive, highly dependent physical relationship.
It contrasts with her life which is being an intellectual , a lecturer at the University.
It also doesn't agree with her role as a single mother.
Good movie that shows how "love", or at least the perception of being in love, can lead to disaster.
क्या आपको पता है
- गूफ़As Helene tosses keys to Alexander for the locked front door, a second head standing behind the actress is briefly visible at the far left side of the frame.
- कनेक्शनReferences Hiroshima Mon Amour (1959)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Simple Passion?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $3,518
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $1,286
- 23 जन॰ 2022
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $3,14,687
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 39 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें