अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंTop British chefs compete against each other and are scored by a panel of acclaimed judges for the chance to cook one course of a four course banquet.Top British chefs compete against each other and are scored by a panel of acclaimed judges for the chance to cook one course of a four course banquet.Top British chefs compete against each other and are scored by a panel of acclaimed judges for the chance to cook one course of a four course banquet.
एपिसोड ब्राउज़ करें
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Actually me wife and i love the show, with reservations. We love food and we love britain. We are only on episode 37 of season 5, but if what we have seen is representative, it certainly could be better. Most of the british food shows include TODAY'S british, many of east indian, asian, and west indian/african heritage, and almost all of all of them include interational cusine--i would argue that anglo-indian cusine IS british).
How much lamb and mutton can be offered--NEVER curried, by the way? Not to mention rabbit, rabbit, and more rabbit, every now with pigeon or quail. Why never a partridge? Or a pear (tree)? If you like rhubarb and stawberries for your pud, this is the place.
The judging is incredibly inconsistent, bordering on insane, from the chef-judges tp prue and her bookends. Their explanations are consistently ridiculous, but otherwise, always inconsistent.
But selection and preparation are pretty well covered and we really enjoy the chefs' evaluations of each others' dishes.
Wimpering slobbering over elderly twit prince charles--to serve him is apparently a big attraction for the chefs--begins each episode and is constantly brought up as if it had some holy meaning. A hoot to us.
Hey! There's a quarantine on and not much new. If you like food and love the british, it aint bad, innit?
How much lamb and mutton can be offered--NEVER curried, by the way? Not to mention rabbit, rabbit, and more rabbit, every now with pigeon or quail. Why never a partridge? Or a pear (tree)? If you like rhubarb and stawberries for your pud, this is the place.
The judging is incredibly inconsistent, bordering on insane, from the chef-judges tp prue and her bookends. Their explanations are consistently ridiculous, but otherwise, always inconsistent.
But selection and preparation are pretty well covered and we really enjoy the chefs' evaluations of each others' dishes.
Wimpering slobbering over elderly twit prince charles--to serve him is apparently a big attraction for the chefs--begins each episode and is constantly brought up as if it had some holy meaning. A hoot to us.
Hey! There's a quarantine on and not much new. If you like food and love the british, it aint bad, innit?
I find your having added a presenter is quite irritating. She doesn't add anything to the series. She is not funny or even entertaining.
Other than Prue, the final judges are generally rubbish. The camerawork, preliminary judging, cooking, cooking quality, gamesmanship, intimacy of the kitchen are all above average.
I am just shocked by the companions to Prue's role.. they should appreciate the work, the use of the ingredients and the taste/ presentation. They just seemed more interested in being noticed than being fair. Having seen judging on master chef professional - I am just shocked.
But the show is worth watching except for the final judging.
Oh I now have 61 characters left so I have to keep on typing for a little bit.
I am just shocked by the companions to Prue's role.. they should appreciate the work, the use of the ingredients and the taste/ presentation. They just seemed more interested in being noticed than being fair. Having seen judging on master chef professional - I am just shocked.
But the show is worth watching except for the final judging.
Oh I now have 61 characters left so I have to keep on typing for a little bit.
My feelings on this show have changed over time - I saw it for the first time around 2016 or so, and I've actually gone and watched nearly every season I can.
From season 16 on, with Andi Oliver as presenter, I absolutely love it. Nisha, Ed, and Tom are great judges and the humour is fab.
But season 15 was weird and all the prior ones are stodgy and stuff because the judges were very snobby people. Nice, but snobby and very white British.
But I'm Canadian and I watch on iPlayer. Like any British show aired in Canada, if you saw a broadcast version, they'd cut out way too much to take from 58 minutes in the UK to 42 minutes here.
The gist of the series is this: the UK is divvied into 8 regions, and in each, four chefs - previously just 3 - compete over 4 courses (and, since 2015/2016, two not judged tasters, a canapé & pre dessert, which are used for tie-breaking).
The show used to be 5x30 minutes a week, and now it is 3x58:00 instead. It's the same format weekly for 8 weeks - canapé, starter and fish on night one, main and pre-dessert and dessert on night two, and all 6 courses cooked for the judges by the top two chefs of that heat on night 3.
The first two shows each week have a mentor chef judge who will score all the courses after the day's cooking. The top 3 on night one continue on, with the 4th getting the axe. The top 2 go through after desserts on night 2. And on night three, the top chef then gets put through to the finals week.
In finals week, all 8 chefs compete to try to get one or more courses through to the "great British banquet." First night is starters, second is fish, etc. Fifth night, it's the big banquet and you see how it all plays out.
This year, the theme is British animation & illustration, and prior years have been things like great British science contributions, technology, rock n roll, TV, etc. I love watching the creative ways chefs meet the brief, which has vastly improved since season 1.
I also love how the show is never nasty or mean spirited. Chefs help each other and have lots of camaraderie. But that was not true in the early seasons, which I didn't enjoy. I think it changed by year 5 or so, under new directors who decided to make it competitive but friendly.
Now with the new judges and host, the personality of the show has caught up to the pleasant fun competitiveness.
This is one series where you can start watching at any point in the years it has been aired on, so I highly recommend watching seasons 16-18, if you're new to the show. (For whiplash, after you finish, watch the very toxic season 1.)
From season 16 on, with Andi Oliver as presenter, I absolutely love it. Nisha, Ed, and Tom are great judges and the humour is fab.
But season 15 was weird and all the prior ones are stodgy and stuff because the judges were very snobby people. Nice, but snobby and very white British.
But I'm Canadian and I watch on iPlayer. Like any British show aired in Canada, if you saw a broadcast version, they'd cut out way too much to take from 58 minutes in the UK to 42 minutes here.
The gist of the series is this: the UK is divvied into 8 regions, and in each, four chefs - previously just 3 - compete over 4 courses (and, since 2015/2016, two not judged tasters, a canapé & pre dessert, which are used for tie-breaking).
The show used to be 5x30 minutes a week, and now it is 3x58:00 instead. It's the same format weekly for 8 weeks - canapé, starter and fish on night one, main and pre-dessert and dessert on night two, and all 6 courses cooked for the judges by the top two chefs of that heat on night 3.
The first two shows each week have a mentor chef judge who will score all the courses after the day's cooking. The top 3 on night one continue on, with the 4th getting the axe. The top 2 go through after desserts on night 2. And on night three, the top chef then gets put through to the finals week.
In finals week, all 8 chefs compete to try to get one or more courses through to the "great British banquet." First night is starters, second is fish, etc. Fifth night, it's the big banquet and you see how it all plays out.
This year, the theme is British animation & illustration, and prior years have been things like great British science contributions, technology, rock n roll, TV, etc. I love watching the creative ways chefs meet the brief, which has vastly improved since season 1.
I also love how the show is never nasty or mean spirited. Chefs help each other and have lots of camaraderie. But that was not true in the early seasons, which I didn't enjoy. I think it changed by year 5 or so, under new directors who decided to make it competitive but friendly.
Now with the new judges and host, the personality of the show has caught up to the pleasant fun competitiveness.
This is one series where you can start watching at any point in the years it has been aired on, so I highly recommend watching seasons 16-18, if you're new to the show. (For whiplash, after you finish, watch the very toxic season 1.)
I'm loving this show - its format, the food, the contestants, the daily judges. Not crazy about the weeks' final judges with their superior little food airs and snide comments. BUT (as they say on the show) - I can't find any season other than #13! None of my usual sources have it at all - just Hulu with the current season. Anyone else find it somewhere?
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाOn Saturday, 2nd November 2019 the British Broadcasting Corporation announced that they have commissioned a 15th series of the programme to be aired in Spring 2020. Scottish comedian Susan Calman will take over presenting duties for series 15, the format has been tweaked and will feature more chefs and more dishes. The theme for series 15 will be iconic food from children's literature.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Breakfast: 12 जून 2010 को प्रसारित एपिसोड (2010)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- The Great British Menu
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- रंग
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें