अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंAn exploration into the various ways in which, within the circumstances of one day, civilisation could be brought to an abrupt end..An exploration into the various ways in which, within the circumstances of one day, civilisation could be brought to an abrupt end..An exploration into the various ways in which, within the circumstances of one day, civilisation could be brought to an abrupt end..
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
फ़ोटो
Bill McGuire
- Self - Benfield Greig Hazard Research Centre, UCL
- (as Prof. Bill McGuire)
Jay Melosh
- Self - University of Arizona Lunar & Planetary Laboratory
- (as Prof. Jay Melosh)
Simon Day
- Self - Benfield Greig Hazzard Research Center, UCL
- (as Dr. Simon Day)
David Levy
- Self - Jamac Observatory
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
John Oxford
- Self - University of London
- (as Prof. John Oxford)
Brian Cox
- Self - Manchester University
- (as Dr. Brian Cox)
Frank Close
- Self - Oxford University
- (as Prof. Frank Close)
David Riley
- Newsreader
- (वॉइस)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
10Nobbsy
I don't get the low rating for this well done little movie. In the style of "Groundhog Day" , it presents several possible mega-catastrophes, two of which have actually occurred since this docu-drama was made, in 2004. The last catastrophic event dramatized in the movie is a physics experiment gone wrong. It is the most catastrophic of all, but, No Spoilers, you'll have to watch the movie.
What the hell is wrong with people releasing something like this, I just need to point out one thing. A meteorite is falling behind a kid and the kid is just watching it from a train leaving the city like nothing is happening.
Its not about acting, reaction of people are so unbelievable unreal that it makes this thing even more terrible then it is.
A tsunami higher then most buildings in Manhattan sweeps down the streets and a guy in a car just watches it and is like wooow thats big.
Judging strictly on a realism scale (and perhaps a cheesiness scale) I would have given this one a 6 or 7. It gets the bonus point for a few moments and references that are genuinely hilarious if you are quick enough to catch them.
Part Groundhog Day, part Run Lola Run (without the awesome soundtrack), we follow a scientist working on a LHC-type project trying to fly from London to NYC for the big experiment. We cycle through the day repeatedly with different scenarios unfolding:
1) A massive tsunami hitting NYC; 2) A meteor storm and incoming larger meteor; 3) A new pandemic; 4) The Yellowstone caldera finally blows; 5) The LNC does, in fact, produce a black hole
I think this could have been an amazingly intelligent 'what if' (or, as the movie's mantra says "not what if, but when") scenario projection with some thoughtful commentary on such events, but it was largely reduced to a scientific summation in each instance.
I also found that the idea of parallel events (people who cross the Dr.'s path on his way to the airport, etc) could have been even more flushed out, but that would have made it more of a two-hour movie rather than a 1-hour spoonful of docudrama. It would have made this much stronger though.
As 3 and 4 are the most likely scenarios, it was very sobering to watch. And 1 is certainly more plausible with the recent footage of Superstorm Sandy's effects on a populous city like NY. Sadly the 5th was laughable, but perhaps that was the point? Why worry about a particle collider (which we now know, went onward with its experiment without catastrophic results) when we have scenarios that are far more likely?
Part Groundhog Day, part Run Lola Run (without the awesome soundtrack), we follow a scientist working on a LHC-type project trying to fly from London to NYC for the big experiment. We cycle through the day repeatedly with different scenarios unfolding:
1) A massive tsunami hitting NYC; 2) A meteor storm and incoming larger meteor; 3) A new pandemic; 4) The Yellowstone caldera finally blows; 5) The LNC does, in fact, produce a black hole
I think this could have been an amazingly intelligent 'what if' (or, as the movie's mantra says "not what if, but when") scenario projection with some thoughtful commentary on such events, but it was largely reduced to a scientific summation in each instance.
I also found that the idea of parallel events (people who cross the Dr.'s path on his way to the airport, etc) could have been even more flushed out, but that would have made it more of a two-hour movie rather than a 1-hour spoonful of docudrama. It would have made this much stronger though.
As 3 and 4 are the most likely scenarios, it was very sobering to watch. And 1 is certainly more plausible with the recent footage of Superstorm Sandy's effects on a populous city like NY. Sadly the 5th was laughable, but perhaps that was the point? Why worry about a particle collider (which we now know, went onward with its experiment without catastrophic results) when we have scenarios that are far more likely?
Interesting but flawed. The effects are fairly well done. Not a lot of new info here that most people don't know.
Entertaining and short.
Entertaining and short.
This is a great made for TV disaster movie. If you love the genre you should see it. No, it's not a billion dollar budget, but it can still be an 8 for what it is. Maybe a 7.5 but I always round up if I think the general rating is too low.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAs the taxi pulls away from the hotel at the start of the second scenario, a movie theatre can be seen across the road with the sign over the entrance reading "Now Showing Groundhog Day" an obvious reference between the similarities to the storyline of Groundhog Day (1993) and the docudrama's filming style.
- गूफ़A supposed news reporter mentions Eastern Seaboard Time. There's no such thing.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि48 मिनट
- रंग
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.78 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें