क्लाइव ओवेन एवं नाओमी वाट्स इस जोश से भर देने वाली, एक्शन से भरपूर थ्रिलर में कलाकार हैं जो एक ऐसे आदमी के बारे में है जोकि एक ऐसे बेईमान अंतरराष्ट्रीय हथियार बेचने वाले गिरोह को पकड़वाने के... सभी पढ़ेंक्लाइव ओवेन एवं नाओमी वाट्स इस जोश से भर देने वाली, एक्शन से भरपूर थ्रिलर में कलाकार हैं जो एक ऐसे आदमी के बारे में है जोकि एक ऐसे बेईमान अंतरराष्ट्रीय हथियार बेचने वाले गिरोह को पकड़वाने के लिए दृढ़ संकल्प है जो दुनिया भर में नरसंहार और आतंकवाद के लिए पैसा देता है... क़ीमत चाहे ... सभी पढ़ेंक्लाइव ओवेन एवं नाओमी वाट्स इस जोश से भर देने वाली, एक्शन से भरपूर थ्रिलर में कलाकार हैं जो एक ऐसे आदमी के बारे में है जोकि एक ऐसे बेईमान अंतरराष्ट्रीय हथियार बेचने वाले गिरोह को पकड़वाने के लिए दृढ़ संकल्प है जो दुनिया भर में नरसंहार और आतंकवाद के लिए पैसा देता है... क़ीमत चाहे जो हो!
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 1 नामांकन
- Umberto Calvini
- (as Luca Giorgio Barbareschi)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I pretty much had zero expectations for this film. I'd seen an ad or two and it looked conventional at best, clumsy at worst. The previews certainly don't do it justice. It starts smart and mean and doesn't let up. Not everyone will enjoy the unrelenting mood, but I found the picture intense and the rest of the audience in the theater seemed to agree. It helps that Clive Owen is believable as the protagonist and is highly watchable. A lesser actor in the role would have made the film much less effective. Armin Mueller-Stahl also adds credibility and depth. Other supporting actors were, for the most part, strong and gritty. There was probably pressure for a female lead, so in Noami Watts's defense, this is probably part of the reason why the character feels so irrelevant.
I'm happy anytime that a slick international thriller has some brains and isn't completely predictable, so I found the picture highly entertaining, if imperfect. It it flawed? Most certainly. But if you walk into the theater without pretensions, you'll probably be as entertained as I was. And I do think a theater visit is warranted, for the photography mentioned by previous reviewers, if not for the Guggenheim scene alone. I think it's dangerous to trump up a scene too much, because it inevitably leads to disappointment. But having no idea about what was coming... suffice to say, I didn't find the directing anything other than thrilling.
You learn how certain filmmakers twist ideas. How their imagination is shaped. Sometimes it is beautiful. Sometimes it stays beautiful and by not changing loses its luster. Then you have guys like Tykwer. He develops. He tries new moves. He thinks deeply about film. He's the guy who reimagined "Rashomon." He's the fellow who stood with Cate Blanchett looking as Kieslowski with a Kieslowski script by God!
He made a film based on sight as smell, and recently one on cinematic sight through blindness.
Now he makes an action movie with, guess what? No sex, no car chase, no fight on the top of a train, no gasoline explosions. And he doesn't rely on that newspaper notion of "a thinking man's thriller," because he deliberately makes the template so ordinary it fades from view. It hardly matters that there is a bank involved. Its all about that vanilla bugaboo, the conspiracy that compromises the authorities and (usually) involves arms. Really, the story disappears.
What we are left with is an amazing use of context. I've seen James Bond, Jason Bourne and Laura Croft traipse through famous cities, but their beings are never affected. Tykwer, I surmise, saw this as an opportunity to do a Kieslowski with cities instead of rooms. Look at what he does, its an entirely environmental film. Its not quite enough, but if you are there already, its sublime.
What else? Well, test audiences did not get it, so there was a scene replaced, the one in the Guggenheim. If you have ever been in that building it is remarkable. Its a failure, an intrusive imposition. You can see where Frank knew that corners were bad, but he so mismanages the eye that you retreat into the art, or try too. Its an amazing, disturbing experience. Tykwer exploits the very things about this space that make it so unnerving.
He pretty much gleefully trashes it. This one scene, added after the movie was finished, makes the whole adventure worthwhile.
If you know architectural cinema, you'll know it was invented by Welles and depends on planes and corners. These are absent here. We have a new method, a new eye.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
First, the only problem I had with the film is the screenplay, some contrived lines, especially in the third act, stick out. The dialogue really tries to force the theme down the viewers throat. Other than that, everything else was top notch. The way the story is set up and fleshed out was engrossing to me. I like a film that lets the viewer figure it out for themselves. It's got a classic mystery set up, where the viewer is in the shoes of the protagonist, we get to figure it out along with him as he unravels it.
Clive Owen and Naomi Watts were decent, but not really stretching there acting legs here. The cinematography and locations were beautiful, filmed in a neo-noirish blue/grey color palette with lots of wide angle shots of the characters dwarfed by the urban architecture. The shootout was very well done and more realistic and grittier than the usual action set piece.
It actually reminded me of a Michael Mann film.
Go see it, you'll enjoy it.
The movie's plot is that two agents (Clive Owen and Naomi Watts) investigate a major bank's role in arms trading. In a quest that takes them to places as far apart as New York and Luxembourg* and even Turkey, these two do everything to look into the bizarre conspiracy...not without interference. But the overall point is that pretty much everyone in these sorts of affairs is, for lack of a better word, bad. And it's a true representation of what we've seen in the world during the past few years.
All in all, this movie was no worse than I expected, no better than I expected. Worth seeing maybe once. Directed by Tom Tykwer ("Run Lola Run") and also starring Armin Mueller-Stahl.
*We don't often see Luxembourg in movies. Or hear about it at all.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAn explosive shootout scene is set inside New York's famous Guggenheim Museum. The production team used the Guggenheim's original blueprints to build a full-size replica of its interior in an abandoned locomotive warehouse. Construction took four months.
- गूफ़When Salinger and Karssen meet on the Grand Bazaar rooftop in Istanbul, both characters are backlit, even though they are facing each other. (According to the DVD commentary, the director wanted both to be lit by a dramatic back light. The scene was filmed twice, once in the morning and once in the evening. After cutting between the two shoots, the sun is behind both actors in the scene.)
- भाव
Wilhelm Wexler: Sometimes a man can meet his destiny on the road he took to avoid it.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटDuring the credits fade-in on the second and third newspaper printed articles, look above the main story of focus and you will see articles that reference a company by the name of SuckleOil, which is most likely a nod to Producer Richard Suckle.
- साउंडट्रैकStrange Brew
Written by Eric Clapton, Gail Collins and Felix Pappalardi
Performed by Cream
Courtesy of Universal International Music B.V.
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
टॉप पसंद
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइटें
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Agente internacional
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Autostadt, Wolfsburg, Lower Saxony, जर्मनी(Calvini's headquarters)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $5,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $2,54,50,527
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $93,31,739
- 15 फ़र॰ 2009
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $6,02,53,843
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 58 मि(118 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.40 : 1