IMDb रेटिंग
2.6/10
1.2 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंAfter an accident, a government Agent gains the ability of super-speed and goes after an old friend turned Nemesis.After an accident, a government Agent gains the ability of super-speed and goes after an old friend turned Nemesis.After an accident, a government Agent gains the ability of super-speed and goes after an old friend turned Nemesis.
K.C. Clyde
- Barcroft
- (as KC Clyde)
Kari Hawker-Diaz
- Young Nurse
- (as Keri Hawker)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Well the box looked good, should be a good movie right?
This movie is such a knockoff of The Flash and it is also surprisingly violent.
This is NOT a movie to show children. It is very bloody.
The acting is rather boring except for a few actors.
I was also disappointed in the Lightspeed suit. It was basically a ski speed suit with white markings on it. Blah.
Nothing more than a SciFi made for TV movie.
Skip it.
I'd say rent or buy the old Flash TV series... it's a lot better!
This movie is such a knockoff of The Flash and it is also surprisingly violent.
This is NOT a movie to show children. It is very bloody.
The acting is rather boring except for a few actors.
I was also disappointed in the Lightspeed suit. It was basically a ski speed suit with white markings on it. Blah.
Nothing more than a SciFi made for TV movie.
Skip it.
I'd say rent or buy the old Flash TV series... it's a lot better!
This was the worst movie I have seen on sci-fi and they are notorious for producing the worst movies ever.
I cannot believe Stan lee put his name on this but after seeing who wants to be a superhero I now know.
I will start with the plot. Flash meets Darkman nuff said, nothing original. Casting, our lead hero has a comb over and looks like he's pushing 50 plus. The henchman look like no-budget porn extras. And the effects were ridiculous, even the Flash TV series from 16 years ago had better effects. If this was made in the 1950's that would explain the really bad special effects. The story and dialog you can imagine is par with the rest of the production value. Okay the worst thing was our hero's costume, he goes to a sporting goods store and the salesman goes in the back and gets his suit, that's it. And it looks like a costume from a homemade comic book fan movie. I would say I liked the python character until his comical fight scenes.
Watching QVC is more entertaining.
I cannot believe Stan lee put his name on this but after seeing who wants to be a superhero I now know.
I will start with the plot. Flash meets Darkman nuff said, nothing original. Casting, our lead hero has a comb over and looks like he's pushing 50 plus. The henchman look like no-budget porn extras. And the effects were ridiculous, even the Flash TV series from 16 years ago had better effects. If this was made in the 1950's that would explain the really bad special effects. The story and dialog you can imagine is par with the rest of the production value. Okay the worst thing was our hero's costume, he goes to a sporting goods store and the salesman goes in the back and gets his suit, that's it. And it looks like a costume from a homemade comic book fan movie. I would say I liked the python character until his comical fight scenes.
Watching QVC is more entertaining.
I wonder why film studios make these low budget versions of superhero stories, everything about it was mediocre, acting, effects, story. Having seen the likes of Spider-man and Sin City this felt like I went back to the early 90s and not in a good reminiscing way. The main character looks about 50, balding fairly heavily, and not very fit, which didn't give me much confidence in his running ability, the python chap was quite good though, and i'm guessing they spent 90% of the budget on his average make-up.
The best bit of this film was the high speed running sequences, my misses thought it was a straight up comedy. I beg you not to waste your time on this, watch something else, BUT if you do have to watch it, enjoy the running.
The best bit of this film was the high speed running sequences, my misses thought it was a straight up comedy. I beg you not to waste your time on this, watch something else, BUT if you do have to watch it, enjoy the running.
Lightspeed is about a superhero, not unlike the excellent TV super hero, Flash, but with a lot less "flash". Python, his nemesis has great makeup, terrible lines and not a great super villain, who provides the typical strains of a bad guy gone rampant. Lightspeed is one of the worst movies I have had the displeasure of watching since Alien Apocalypse. Mr. Lee is one person I have the greatest respect for, especially with his Spiderman and Hulk movies showing some excitement, but Lightspeed is a dud at best. I had trouble watching the poor acting, and the actor, Connery, although Sean Connery's son and a good actor, just couldn't make this movie click for me. The plot was typical and droll, and the imagination of the special defects ( I mean effects) are silly and graphically lacking anything close to exciting. I would think Stan Lee could have done more with it and maybe have done a remake of Flash with a bit more flair and improved special effects, a plot, and better acting. All in all, Lightspeed is not worth watching a second time. Stick to Who Wants to be a Superhero, this movie is not even laughable, but leaves one to only groan and remain disappointed.
Stan Lee owes me 90 minutes of my life back. It's a simple story: two men are both changed by experiments and science gone bad. one becomes a snake man and the other develops super speed and a heart problem. Whacky high-jinx ensue.
Here are the problems with the movie:
1) Plot is horrible. The writers borrow plot points directly from Spiderman and The Flash.
2) The acting is even worse, but it's not all the actor's fault: dialogue is laughable. Nicole Eggert and Lee Majors are both in this movie, nuff said.
3) The directing is just bad. There are scenes where a person is talking and the shot does not have their mouth in it, just their forehead and nose, then the camera zooms out and re-frames.
4) There is nothing special about those special effects. The main character wears a ski suite as a costume.
All and all this movie looks and feels much cheaper and cheesier than a made for TV movie (that's saying a lot). It's pretty much like someone bought a camcorder and filmed it on weekends with their buddies.
Here are the problems with the movie:
1) Plot is horrible. The writers borrow plot points directly from Spiderman and The Flash.
2) The acting is even worse, but it's not all the actor's fault: dialogue is laughable. Nicole Eggert and Lee Majors are both in this movie, nuff said.
3) The directing is just bad. There are scenes where a person is talking and the shot does not have their mouth in it, just their forehead and nose, then the camera zooms out and re-frames.
4) There is nothing special about those special effects. The main character wears a ski suite as a costume.
All and all this movie looks and feels much cheaper and cheesier than a made for TV movie (that's saying a lot). It's pretty much like someone bought a camcorder and filmed it on weekends with their buddies.
क्या आपको पता है
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें