क्वेंटिन टारनटिनो और रॉबर्ट रोड्रिग्ज ने 60 और 70 के दशक में एक साथ दो पंथ फिल्मों के साथ दोगिनी विशेषताओं का शोषण करने के लिए श्रद्धांजलि दी, जिसमें उनके बीच आने वाले आकर्षण के साक्षात्कार ... सभी पढ़ेंक्वेंटिन टारनटिनो और रॉबर्ट रोड्रिग्ज ने 60 और 70 के दशक में एक साथ दो पंथ फिल्मों के साथ दोगिनी विशेषताओं का शोषण करने के लिए श्रद्धांजलि दी, जिसमें उनके बीच आने वाले आकर्षण के साक्षात्कार शामिल हैं।क्वेंटिन टारनटिनो और रॉबर्ट रोड्रिग्ज ने 60 और 70 के दशक में एक साथ दो पंथ फिल्मों के साथ दोगिनी विशेषताओं का शोषण करने के लिए श्रद्धांजलि दी, जिसमें उनके बीच आने वाले आकर्षण के साक्षात्कार शामिल हैं।
- पुरस्कार
- 10 जीत और कुल 22 नामांकन
- Zoë Bell (segment "Death Proof")
- (as Zoe Bell)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
When you approach films from certain filmmakers, you do it on a basis of trust. Its a matter of how willing you are to allow yourself to be.
Rodriguez has never betrayed my trust, so each time I encounter him, I am willing to play the game by his rules. That allows me to take more chances about the balances he chooses to make. Its a matter of yielding in the collaboration, so when he makes a cinematic joke or comment, I don't fight it. Trust.
In this case, its sharpened by this phenomenon I notice a lot: he's directing a lover. It is obvious of course, but even if it weren't, it drives him to make ever stronger chances, on the edge of his emotional horizon.
I think these two factors would make me like what he has done here regardless of all other factors. I do see the interior nature of the cinematic world. I do settle into the thick web of narrative threads. I do cheer when his love kicks ass.
But the opposite is the case with Quentin. I cannot trust him. It isn't just because he's made some bad films. Its because he sets himself aside. He doesn't include the viewer: he preaches. All of the cinematic effects are delivered as monologues not as a collaboration. So we are never in on the joke, never in on extending the nature of the world.
So I truly disliked his film. Sure, there's an empowerment story, and a sort of male's view of female bonding. But its all from the outside: the current of fate, the access to the group, the folding of all the principle characters being in the movie business. The actual camera-work of the stunts is from a discrete viewer, where Rodriguez puts the camera jumping around in the midst of the action and the emotional space.
Both films play with the joke of what constitutes good and evil. But they themselves represent this as well.
I will give Rodriguez a 3 and Tarantino a 1, but having Tarantino to have to go through increases the value of Rodriguez' effort. Bless him. I hope he does well with this woman.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
I want to compliment the directors for having a unique cinematic vision (and the Weinsteins for funding that vision). I don't always agree with the choices made with either of the filmmakers, but I think they are two of the hardest working most innovative people in Hollywood today. I add this because most film studies students love to hate both of these people and in most conversations suggest that they would be able to do a much better job than either. I disagree.
Planet terror is a gross out flick that has appropriate amounts of gore and guts. If you like Rodriguez, then this movie fits in with all of his previous works. No real surprises here, but fun fun fun!
Tarantino surprised me. I liked the first movies from Tarantino because his movies were set in realities not far from our own. I doubt that it would happen in a weekend, but Pulp Fiction is a semi-believable good story in Los Angeles with unbelievable dialog. Same with Reservoir Dogs. (Jackie Brown is too believable and therefore, uninteresting) As he has progressed, his movies became fantasy, e.g., From Dusk til Dawn and Kill Bill 1 & 2 and WAY too over the top for a "Tarantino" flick.
Death Proof brings it all home! I don't want to spoil any of the movie, so just go see it! It's a simple plot with unbelievable suspense and decent dialog. I have never been so nervous in a film in as long as I can remember. Its no secret that the movie involves a car -- but Tarantino has taken a "classic" car scenario using a classic car and updated it for the new millennium. One only has suspend belief "just enough" for this mix of reality and fantasy to suck them in. It was Tarantino at his best.
Both movies were well executed, well scored, well written, and well played. The extra's and cameos are icing on the cake. No Oscars for either director, but that isn't why you went to see these movies in the first place, now is it?
Planet Terror kept you laughing, groaning, and cringing the entire time. Enough action to keep you into it, enough campy gore to laugh at, and plenty of build up to have you cheering for the good guys. Rodriguez put together an A-rated, B-movie.
Death Proof was also enjoyable. I may have been antsy due to the cramped seating, but it seemed like there was a little lull in the middle. I didn't want to get up at intermission as I didn't want to miss the trailers. As Tarantino has done before, there is some great dialogue flying around the core group of actors.
I will definitely go see it again in the theater. I missed some of the dialogue due to the roar of the audience. However, I think having an interactive audience really adds to the experience.
Enjoy.
You will be surprise, you will be disgusted and you'll enjoy the hell out of it.
A unique cinema experience indeed.
Planet Terror is the very definition of camp, and its only (slight) flaw is how obvious and in-your-face that campiness actually is. This part is action filled, and works perfectly as great, over-the-top, always hilariously fun, gory cheesecake. The second part is slower and somewhat different in tone, and is perhaps better viewed separately, it has its moments but Planet Terror is the superior part.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाNicolas Cage agreed to play Fu Manchu in the Werewolf Women of the SS trailer, for free, as a favor to his friend Rob Zombie.
- गूफ़Because Grindhouse is an homage to the old low budget films of the 70s and 80s, there are many deliberate errors by the filmmakers to give an authentic grindhouse feel.
- भाव
Stuntman Mike: Do I frighten you?
[Arlene nods]
Stuntman Mike: Is it my scar?
Arlene: It's your car.
Stuntman Mike: Yeah, I know. I'm sorry. It's my mom's car.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटJust below the listing for Quentin's personal chef is the following credit: "Personal Chef for Mr. Rodriguez - Robert Rodriguez"
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनTarantino's segment, Death Proof, was lengthened for showing at the Cannes Movie Festival. Most of the film's scratches (used in Grindhouse) were also cut out.
- कनेक्शनEdited into Planet Terror (2007)
- साउंडट्रैकGrindhouse (Main Title)
Written by Robert Rodriguez
टॉप पसंद
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Grind House
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $6,70,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $2,50,37,897
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $1,15,96,613
- 8 अप्रैल 2007
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $2,54,22,088
- चलने की अवधि3 घंटे 11 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1