Call of Duty 2

All I can say is wow! WW2 games were really starting to get old at this point. Do you really wanna storm Normandy Beach on D-Day once again? Hell Yeah! The graphics are incredible the lighting effects make for an amazing experience, but it is still a FPS, (First Person Shooter) like any it becomes somewhat repetitive wishing levels were over much before they are. The game makes up for this in it's difficulty the notorious veteran mode had me stumped on the game for almost 2 and 1/2 months. Not that you'll want to replay the game anytime after you beat it for the first time. It needs a good 6th month break before picking it up again. The partial reason this game seems so great is that it takes a well know genre and steps it up a few notches. It is an improvement for its' predecessor and the genre in general. 8/10

"Call of Duty 2", released in 2005, became one of the most impressive games of its time, taking the series to a new level. The developers of Infinity Ward managed to create a shooter that not only surpassed its predecessor, but also offered a lot of innovations that made the game unforgettable.

One of the main achievements of "Call of Duty 2" was the improved graphics. The game struck with realistic visual effects, detailed textures and dynamic lighting. Fighting on snow-covered fields, in destroyed cities and on deserted fronts looked so impressive that in those years it seemed as if you were really on the battlefield. The atmosphere was especially memorable - the player felt that he was immersed in a real story, fighting side by side with the soldiers of that era.

The missions in "Call of Duty 2" were all as varied as in the original series. The game once again offered three campaigns, each of which allowed you to plunge into different theaters of World War II. Campaigns for Americans, British and Soviet soldiers opened up different perspectives on the war, offering unique missions. This variety made each campaign interesting and original to some extent, not allowing the player to get bored.

One of the most notable innovations of "Call of Duty 2" was the absence of a traditional health scale. For the first time in the series, an automatic XP recovery mechanism was introduced when the screen turned red when taking damage and the player needed to take cover to regain strength. This innovation has changed the dynamics of the gameplay, forcing players to act more cautiously. For 2005, of course, this was something new and even controversial. However, it is worth noting that this decision significantly influenced the further development of shooters.

The toy also impressed with its soundtrack. The sounds of gunshots, explosions and screams of soldiers were so realistic that it seemed as if you were really on the battlefield. All this sounded especially cool in high-quality headphones, when the decomposition of the audio signal made it possible to clearly determine where certain sounds were coming from, starting from shots and ending with the screams of soldiers on the battlefield. The musical score, written by Graham Revell, perfectly complemented the atmosphere, enhancing the drama and tension at key moments of the game.

I remember "Call of Duty 2" with warmth, as well as the original. The game has passed the test of time, becoming to some extent one of the pillars of the entire series. She managed to keep the spirit of the original game alive, while offering many improvements and innovations that made her one of the best. Improved graphics, diverse and intense missions, as well as bold innovations in gameplay mechanics - all this has made "Call of Duty 2" not just a sequel, but a real step forward for the entire industry.

9 out of 10.

This game is excellent! The graphics are incredible. When people are talking, you can actually see their lips moving along with the words! That is something that video games barely ever do. I love this game. It is one of my top ten favorite of all time. It is just so good. It is a very long game with very long levels with lots of action in every level. It is very realistic. Your team mates know exactly where the bullets that are being fired are coming from and know not to go there and they can throw grenades and they can actually talk to you and stuff like that. This game is actually even dramatic in parts but in a good way because some games try to be dramatic. This is a great game. 10/10.

When I got my 360 for Xmas, this was the only game I received. I'd pleaded with my Mum not to get it mixed up with 'Big Red One' for the original Xbox, and I was overjoyed when she hadn't.

Pros:

Graphics-The detail, lighting, and effects on this game are amazing! the dust and smoke from the explosions, the flashing red screen when you've been shot, the grainy sand of the desert towns, the rock faces and water effects at Normandy....all of these amount to make one of the greatest looking games I've ever seen.

Sound effects- These were excellent too. The crashes of the explosions, the piercing gunshots as you move round the corner, the spit of the bullets as they crash into the scenery behind you all add to a great feeling of authenticity.

A.I-the Artificial intelligence has improved this time round. Your squad-mates know when and where to provide covering fire, alert you to hidden enemies or tanks....a considerable yet not significant upgrade.

Cons:

Repetition- Again, its just shooting and more shooting, punctuated occasionally by planting sticky bombs on tanks and distracting enemies with smoke grenades.

Setting- I know this is Call of Duty and it's set during WWII, but the 1940s setting is beginning to drag on a bit. Perhaps you could play as one of the Axis officers, or maybe they could make a Call of Duty set in the future....who knows?

Overall: A vast improvement on Finest Hour, so in my opinion, this gets 9/10.

First off, I know I am only asking to have people dislike my review as I am going against the grain and when one tends to do that to a video game none of your points are taken. They see you do not rank their favorite game until the sequel comes out low, and this for reasons tear a person up inside. I like Final Fantasy games, but I do not care if others do to the point of dismissing that person's opinion all together. Still, I know what I am in for, but I shall press on and say, this game just did not make for an enjoyable game playing experience. It looked stunning, and I did enjoy it a bit at first, but it was just a game I could not get into and none of the commercials of the later games makes me want to play them.

This was one of the first games I played on the Xbox 360, which is why I initially enjoyed it. It showcased the new systems power quite well as the graphics were stunning. Very crisp to say the least. The game is your standard first person shooter, however, and this is a genre I am not a big fan of. I see why others like it, I just am not crazy about it...just as others out there hate RPGs and such. You run around with only your gun present and you are constantly being hit which in real life would be a one way ticket to a hospital or grave, but your guy can withstand quite the onslaught of bullets and shrapnel and can be completely healed by a first aid kit. If only thing progressed like this in the real world, wars would last infinitely as long as conveniently placed first aid kits and ammo was scattered throughout the world. The game is divided into different areas and you take on the role of a different soldier in each level or front of a World War II battle. You have a different goal each time, and this is probably another reason why I did not care for the game as much as others. I prefer to have a more interconnecting story. Here you must battle in one place and another as a different person each time. I do not know why this did not work for me, I am a bit insane if that helps explain.

All through the game you are killing others in this very detailed environment. It is a bit strange that this Call of Duty game is rated T rather than M. I am also not a big fan of first person shooters where you kill other soldiers. I prefer an alien or monster force to oppose, which is why I sort of liked the first Halo game and Resistance. Very strange here as I like horror films and such, but for some reason I am just not a big fan of killing people in war situations in games. Another thing I cannot explain.

So, it was not an entirely bad game, it had some good points and I certainly see why so many enjoy this game and the series even. This just is not for me is all and I have to rank it according to my enjoyment. It was fun for awhile, but it did not last and thus why I never have and most likely never will play any of the newer games. That and they rely more on online play which I am also not a big fan of. I prefer doing games solo and the game providing me entertainment with its story and missions, not ones I and a group of strangers has to create. I prefer the old school classic games these days to most of the newer stuff being produced, once again just an opinion and a sign I am getting old...now I am sad, but this game is not. If you like FPS games then give it a try, if not steer clear.