IMDb रेटिंग
2.8/10
64 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
इसमें हँसाने वाले रोमांटिक कॉमेडी हैं, जो एक आदमी (कैंपबेल), उसके क्रश (हनिगन), उसके माता-पिता (कूलिज, विलार्ड) और उसके पिता (ग्रिफिन) पर केंद्रित है।इसमें हँसाने वाले रोमांटिक कॉमेडी हैं, जो एक आदमी (कैंपबेल), उसके क्रश (हनिगन), उसके माता-पिता (कूलिज, विलार्ड) और उसके पिता (ग्रिफिन) पर केंद्रित है।इसमें हँसाने वाले रोमांटिक कॉमेडी हैं, जो एक आदमी (कैंपबेल), उसके क्रश (हनिगन), उसके माता-पिता (कूलिज, विलार्ड) और उसके पिता (ग्रिफिन) पर केंद्रित है।
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 4 जीत और कुल 1 नामांकन
Valery M. Ortiz
- Jell-O
- (as Valery Ortiz)
Charlie Dell
- Justice of the Peace
- (as Charles Dell)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
This has got to be one of the worst parody movies ever. No, wait - scratch that. This is one of the worst movies ever. There were so few laughs in this supposed comedy. They few chuckles I heard from the audience was a nervous laughter (as in, "I can't believe I wasted my money on this..."). The toilet humor (literally) was simply retarded, and a few jokes almost worked... if they were funny. Pretty much all of the characters were annoying, and most of the parodies themselves were just unfunny. I really don't know what could have been done to save this movie and actually make it funny. The concept was great, and "date movies" are ripe for being made fun of... yet somehow this just wasn't it.
Are you short for cash, Alyson? Is that why your beautifal face had to be seen on screen in this joke of a parody movie? I went to this movie with high expectations. I mean very high. I am a sucker for the parody genre. Ever since The Naked Gun films and Airplane!, Wrongfully Accused, Spy Hard, Scary Movie.. I've been a nut for these types of movies. So why was this one so bad? I can't really explain.. I saw all the movies they parodied, and still.. it just wasn't funny. I am absolutely in love with Alyson Hannigan. She's a very beautifal and very talented actress. Eddie Griffin is one of the funniest comedians to grace the silver screen in years. And please, Lil' Jon is in the movie! What's not to like? Well, the fact that basically, a lot of the parodies were just word for word retellings of some of the movies. The dinner scene was an ENTIRE ripoff of the Meet the Parents scene to a t. This movie tries too hard to be funny, and at sometimes its okay (the Pimp My Ride scene comes to mind), but honestly.. it just tries too hard and doesn't go anywhere. I can't say I was disappointed, it was beyond that. If there's a sequel to this atrocious comedy I'll eat my hat.
My friends and I went into this movie expecting something along the lines of a dumb but funny movie like "Scary Movie" or "Not another Teen Movie".
Sad to say, this was the worst movie I've seen since the beginning of 2005. DO NOT see this movie and DO NOT believe the advertisements for this movie as those scenes were the best parts of the film. I admit, I laughed during the Napoleon Dynamite skit, but that was probably the only funny scene in the whole film.
This film is stupid, but not stupid in a funny way. It is stupid in an EXTREMELY boring way. The only (barely) entertaining parts of the movie were in the first 10 minutes. The rest of it was filler as the scriptwriter probably ran out of dumb ideas.
I, along with probably most of the audience, felt like leaving on the spot. This is a bad film with no redeeming features.
Sad to say, this was the worst movie I've seen since the beginning of 2005. DO NOT see this movie and DO NOT believe the advertisements for this movie as those scenes were the best parts of the film. I admit, I laughed during the Napoleon Dynamite skit, but that was probably the only funny scene in the whole film.
This film is stupid, but not stupid in a funny way. It is stupid in an EXTREMELY boring way. The only (barely) entertaining parts of the movie were in the first 10 minutes. The rest of it was filler as the scriptwriter probably ran out of dumb ideas.
I, along with probably most of the audience, felt like leaving on the spot. This is a bad film with no redeeming features.
The fact that this movie was allowed to advance past the "script writing" stage is beyond me.
If I could vote it 0, believe me I would. Watching paint dry would be a more cultural experience.
They actually re-created scenes from existing comedy movies & virtually did them note for note. Can somebody explain the word parody to the film makers???
Some of the acting was quite good, it's just a shame that they had so little to work with to be able to assist with making this pile of junk watchable.
If I could vote it 0, believe me I would. Watching paint dry would be a more cultural experience.
They actually re-created scenes from existing comedy movies & virtually did them note for note. Can somebody explain the word parody to the film makers???
Some of the acting was quite good, it's just a shame that they had so little to work with to be able to assist with making this pile of junk watchable.
I'd imagine that the main reason that people are paying to watch this is because it stars Alyson Hannigan. Well, she's in it, and she makes the most of a thoroughly unchallenging role, but unless you're a total completist, that shouldn't be enough of a reason to waste even 80 minutes of your life on this appalling waste of talent.
What the writer/directors seem to have missed is that if you're going to parody or satirise a scene from a decent movie, you actually have to add something. It's not sufficient to just throw a bunch of stolen scenes together in the hope that the conjunction will generate humour by itself. I honestly could not see one - not ONE - original thought or idea or line in the script or direction. That in itself is something of an achievement. The whole thing plays like it was scripted by teenagers, and not teenagers from the top end of the grade curve.
In fact, I have to wonder if this films is deliberately aimed at the lowest common denominator. If so, it missed by several yards to the south.
What the writer/directors seem to have missed is that if you're going to parody or satirise a scene from a decent movie, you actually have to add something. It's not sufficient to just throw a bunch of stolen scenes together in the hope that the conjunction will generate humour by itself. I honestly could not see one - not ONE - original thought or idea or line in the script or direction. That in itself is something of an achievement. The whole thing plays like it was scripted by teenagers, and not teenagers from the top end of the grade curve.
In fact, I have to wonder if this films is deliberately aimed at the lowest common denominator. If so, it missed by several yards to the south.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThis movie was screened for critics before release, which is rare for a Aaron Seltzer and Jason Friedberg movie.
- गूफ़(at around 3 mins) When Julia is doing her "Milkshake" dance, she starts dancing to the taxi driver. In a side shot, the camera is reflected in the side of the taxi.
- भाव
Roz Fockyerdoder: [gives Julia the present after the wedding] It's a vaginal thermometer. It's been in our family for generations.
Linda Jones: It lets you know when your ovulating.
Roz Fockyerdoder: And if you wanna keep it a lucky one, don't ever wash it.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनThe 85-minute extended, unrated version is only about 2 minutes longer and there are some changes:
- In the scene spoofing The Bachelor, the dialogue introducing Grant is different.
- The scene with the cat on the toilet is longer.
- There is some extra dialogue after the wizard gets kicked in the crotch.
- Grant's last name is "Fockyerdoder" instead of "Funkyerdoder".
- Julia shows Jack two extra cards.
- When Nicky is thinking about the honeymoon, the dialogue is different.
- The scene where Roz & Linda are talking is much more explicit.
- Andy's introduction is longer and more suggestive.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in 20 to 1: Adults Only 20 to 01: Sexiest Movie Scenes (2009)
- साउंडट्रैकBridal Chorus
Written by Richard Wagner
Arranged by James Harpham and John Gale
Courtesy of 5 Alarm Music
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Untitled Aaron Seltzer/Jason Friedberg Project
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Church of the Angels - 1100 Avenue 64, पासडेना, कैलिफोर्निया, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(Exterior shot - Location for Julia and Grant's wedding)
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $2,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $4,85,48,426
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $1,90,76,261
- 19 फ़र॰ 2006
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $8,57,49,034
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 23 मि(83 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें