उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं

Now, let me begin by saying that i love cheap horror movies. Can't get enough of 'em. I adore "Plan 9 from Outer Space". I loved "Chopping Mall" and "I Dismember Mama". But this... abomination...

Shot on camcorder in a local graveyard and what seems to be someone's garden shed standing in for the requisite "Evil Dead" shack, this stars (and i use the word advisedly) porno legend Ron Jeremy and the local amateur dramatics society. When the Hedgehog of Sex puts in a movie's best performance, things ain't looking good.

Anyhow, the plot - such as it is - involves two cretinous gravediggers stealing an amulet from the body of a magician / vampire, who promptly rises from the grave to retrieve his filched property, and conjures a horde of zombies from the surrounding graves to help him besiege a shed full of dozy students in which said gravedigging thieves have taken refuge. Leaving aside the question of how a vampire summons zombies, what follows is some of the most inept stuff committed to film. The girl who is spuriously "possessed", gaining spooky eyes DRAWN ONTO HER EYELIDS had me paralysed with laughter rather than fear.

Worth viewing only for the hot brunette chick (Kelly Roth) and the awe-inspiring stunt sequence where a guy hangs and drops a whole 3 feet onto some straw. They even play it in slow motion for maximum devastating effect. This film may well be toxic: do not approach.

Seven young people have decided to spend Halloween night in an old,run down house supposed by the local community to be haunted.However during the night a couple of grave robbers-one of whom is played by porn legend Ron Jeremy-drop by,terrified beyond belief.They are on the run from an army of bloodthirsty zombies,which will not rest until it has killed off everyone in the group."The Wickeds" by John Poague is a laughably bad zombie flick filled with lame acting,absurd situations and tons of cheesy splatter.The script is incredibly poor and rips-off "Night of the Living Dead" and "Children Shouldn't Play with Dead Things".Still Ron Jeremy's character and plenty of zombie mayhem are obvious highlights of this crappy flick.3 out of 10.Not recommended.

Okay, maybe it was obviously supposed to be a joke. But it's a really bad one. Shaun of the Dead and House of 1000 Corpses are send-ups of cheesy horror movies. This movie is an irredeemable piece of crap. It looks like some film-school dropout borrowed his dad's camcorder, provided some free beer for his friends, and drove out to an abandoned farmhouse to try to make a movie. The acting is horrific, the plot is non-existent, and the special effects look like something out of a Saturday Night Live sketch. They couldn't even get the makeup right. The zombies don't even look like zombies. They look like college kids dressed as zombies. I suspect when Ron Jeremy looks back on his career, he'll consider this film to be among his lowest moments. I appreciate bad horror films as much as anyone, but this monstrosity should be avoided at all costs.

The cover was false advertising. I actually was excited to rent it and every time I went to Blockbuster they were out of it.. so I'm guessing a lot of other people were fooled by their cover. Although they were pretty smart to get people to see it (which really, is the main goal) by the misleading cover and synopsis, there was nothing even remotely close to what the cover was like. I spent my time laughing at the bad acting, shadows of the camera guy, cheesy special effects, lame plot, Ron Jeremy?, well why waste my time even talking about it.. the movie just plain sucked.

Don't see it.

Sometimes, we are simply out-smarted by distribution companies. I was wandering through the video store looking for some new horror to rent. I came across this little "**** nugget" and the cover screamed "Rent me!"... Now, I've seen a lot of bad horror films in my life, but this one is just wrong on SO many levels... It is completely mind boggling that some film production company payed actual money to have this thing made... There is nothing salvageable here, bad cinematography (if you could call it that), horrible acting, despicable script and the editing... You can actually see the cameraman in several scenes!

Again, I will take full blame for not reading the back cover. Had I done so, the name "Ron Jeremy" would have jumped out at me, and I would have looked around for creepy guys in trench-coats, thinking I was at the wrong video store...

This thing deserves no rating.

Director John Poague brings Dave Zagorski wonderfully horrifying script to the screen with imagination and vision. The atmosphere is creepy and frightening, the set design astonishingly terror inducing, and the special effects nothing less than amazing. With a minimum of gore, Poague relies on the story itself to elicit the shocks and that it does with great intensity. The scares are unrelenting as a superb cast bring to life a group of flesh and blood characters who we can identify with and feel their vulnerability. Few films succeed in being both intelligent and horrifying at the same time but this one does it supremely well. One must see it to believe the horror, terror, and gripping suspense that is The Wickeds.

Of course this movie was cheesy. It was supposed to be cheesy! Jeez. Learn to take a joke. The whole point of the movie was obviously to make fun of all the stupid, cheesy, B-movies out there. Reading all the other reviews, I can't believe you guys actually took this seriously. A horror movie with porn legend Ron Jeremy? Wasn't that your first clue that this wasn't a horror movie at all? And of course the sex was dry humping. How many of your local mass market video stores stock movies with actually x-rated sex scenes? How many horror movies (think Friday the 13th) have you seen with ACTUAL SEX? You were expecting Marilyn Chambers to jump out of a closet and start blowing a zombie maybe? Get a grip. This movie was so obviously meant to be a send up of the worst of the worst horror movies and, judging by the responses of the other people writing about it here, it went over their heads.

I don't even see a point in writing a good review for something this bad, so I will just rant...

This movie is so bad I only watched 15 minutes of the whole thing. Or even less, seeing as I did fast forward through the whole film.

It is awful. The acting was awful The script was awful. As were the editing, the camera operator, and so on. Even the sex scene was out of order. Until now I didn't think that was even possible. Possibly one or two of the zombies had good make-up. That's it when it comes to the good stuff.

I didn't expect a lot from it, but it didn't cross my mind that it could be this bad. That anything could be this bad. I can't believe someone actually made this. I feel mentally scarred for life now, it was so awful.

I would give this a minus rating if I could, but seeing that 1 is the lowest rating, I will have to settle for that...

Don't even think of watching this. Never, ever.

A group of kids decide to spend Halloween at a house in the countryside being used as a set for a low budget horror film next to a large cemetery where two gravediggers bring the dead back to life by stealing a piece of jewelry from a corpse. Okay, time for the pros and cons. The pros: Ron Jeremy. The (former?) porn star was the best thing in this film. He was the only actor who seemed comfortable in front of the camera, and he seemed to be the only one who didn't take everything too seriously. As a result, he managed to give the film it's only enjoyable moments. The cons: Ron Jeremy is the best thing in the film. That should tell you everything you need to know about the rest of the indistinguishable actors and actresses who spend the entire movie screaming or yelling at each other. It became a bit of a headache, which was made even more infuriating because there is not a bit of common sense in the film, i.e., why did Jeremy and his friend run to the house rather than going to their own truck. Why everyone just doesn't get the other car going. Plus, does there have to be a ghost too? If you can't get the zombie thing down, don't even thing about doing ghosts. Geez, Louise. Enough already!

Truth be known, I sought this film out. I saw a trailer for it before "The Revolting Dead." I hated "The Revolting Dead," which had the same plot about grave robbers being tormented by the returning dead, but I thought this film had to be better. Oddly enough, this film was better than "The Revolting Dead" thanks mainly to Ron Jeremy. (One final note, without meaning to, I have just seen Ron Jeremy in three out of the last four horror movies I saw. I guess there must be a law requiring him to appear in every horror movie under a certain budget. This performance was the best of the three.)

With Ron Jeremy.

One good thing about a lot of really bad horror films is they are unintentionally funny. This film was funny at the beginning because of how bad it was, but after that it just got boring. The movie has everything wrong in it. The gore effects were really fake looking, and ultra plentiful. The acting was really, really bad!!! Some things in it were funny though. In the cemetery it seems as though the director couldn't actually get access to all of it, so many of the tombstones names in the film are blurred out. There's a scene where a creature is biting a character's neck, and you can clearly see that they aren't even near him. The zombies aren't at all scary. It's an idiotic film, that you might enjoy as a comedy, but most likely won't.

Rated R for some sex, violence and language. 82 mins,

Seven teens travel to a derelict house for Halloween. Here they are attacked by a horde of zombies.

I had very low expectations for this film. On paper it seems like your average zombie horror film, where the general standard is incredibly low to begin with.

Turns out it's even worse than that and manages to be far worse than your average zombie thriller. The plot is incredibly unoriginal and close to non-existent. Production values are very poor.

The acting is atrocious: some performances are so bad I don't know they got the role or why they're in that career. The only noteworthy thing is the appearance of Ron Jeremy, the porn star. Even compared to his usual films he would have found the plot, direction, production and performances lacking...

Well, the only thing that kept this movie from being rated a total flop, was one thing. That solitary thing being Mr. Ron Jeremy. Now, the movie itself was Atrocious, we just need to get that out of the way. From the poor camera work, and terrible music.....to the porno-esquire script, and terrible acting. Amidst all of this, Ron Jeremy thrives in true Gutman form. He and his slack-jawed sidekick, set off a world of zombie trouble over an absolutely ridiculous prop referred to as "The Amulet". To Make a long story short, watch this movie, but for nothing more than comedic value and if you have a free rental coupon (like I did). It's definitely not worth the price of admission. From special effects to soundtrack......this movie is garbage.

This movie is so bad terrible acting terrible dialogue zero scares pointless nudity but it's so bad it's good I laughed from beginning to end this movie was hilarious this is not one of those bad movies where your sitting there wondering omg when is this movie gonna end your wondering omg what are they gonna do next and it's nice to see Ron Jeremy get a main lead in a movie well deserved but I swear to God it's written in his contract he has to die in every regular movie he's in anyway I highly recommend this movie it's bad but it's a blast