64 समीक्षाएं
When I first heard about this film, I have to admit I was a bit skeptical. Sex and the movies have always had a bit of a rocky history, with some good results (Last Tango in Paris springs to mind) and quite a few bad ones (Anybody remember Casual Sex?). To be honest, I wasn't expecting the Oh in Ohio to be anything other than more of the same Hollywood piffle, featuring low-brow penis jokes (or, in this case I guess, vagina jokes) that predictably avoid any real thought into what fascinates us as a society about sex: The joys, the painful vulnerability, the almost magical awkwardness of it.
Well, I was pleasantly surprised. The Oh in Ohio has its share of both penis and vagina jokes, but they're all offered with a refreshingly non-puerile frankness. Very rarely has a film dealt with such a touchy subject with such aplomb, all the while avoiding the pitfalls that would make a film like this preachy, or exploitive, or boring. This is a film that's not afraid to say a lot of "dirty" words and put forth a lot of ideas that may make people uncomfortable. But the nice part is, it doesn't seem to care that it's doing it. It doesn't wave sex in the audience's face, saying "look how shocking this is," it just says what it has to say and leaves the audience to laugh, or squirm, or whatever.
The performances are probably the best thing about this film. Parker Posey, who we're used to seeing as the over-the-top characters in films like Best in Show, works well as the tentative "woman on a journey of self discovery". Paul Rudd plays his character lightly and likably, avoiding a lot of the pitfalls that plague men in this kind of film. Miranda Bailey's screechy, fun loving gal pal offers some of the funnier moments in the film, and Mischa Barton is sexily unassuming in her role (which could have, in my opinion, done with a little more meat).
But it's the chemistry between Posey and Danny Devito that really gets this film going. An unlikely pairing on the surface, they really do well together, with Devito offering a performance that is somewhat low-key, but utterly charming. There's a sincerity that comes through that made me want to smile, and frankly, to see more of him on screen.
There were a few moments where the comedy falls flat (at least for me), and some wondering where the characters are going during the course of the film. The direction seemed a little detached at times, particularly when dealing with a subject as intimate as it does.
All in all, The Oh in Ohio is what it is. It's not going to change the world of cinema... but then again, maybe it could: if more films were able to be as un-self conscious this one seems to be, maybe we could all start having fun with sex again, rather than layering it in fart jokes or squirreling it away in soulless pornography.
Well, I was pleasantly surprised. The Oh in Ohio has its share of both penis and vagina jokes, but they're all offered with a refreshingly non-puerile frankness. Very rarely has a film dealt with such a touchy subject with such aplomb, all the while avoiding the pitfalls that would make a film like this preachy, or exploitive, or boring. This is a film that's not afraid to say a lot of "dirty" words and put forth a lot of ideas that may make people uncomfortable. But the nice part is, it doesn't seem to care that it's doing it. It doesn't wave sex in the audience's face, saying "look how shocking this is," it just says what it has to say and leaves the audience to laugh, or squirm, or whatever.
The performances are probably the best thing about this film. Parker Posey, who we're used to seeing as the over-the-top characters in films like Best in Show, works well as the tentative "woman on a journey of self discovery". Paul Rudd plays his character lightly and likably, avoiding a lot of the pitfalls that plague men in this kind of film. Miranda Bailey's screechy, fun loving gal pal offers some of the funnier moments in the film, and Mischa Barton is sexily unassuming in her role (which could have, in my opinion, done with a little more meat).
But it's the chemistry between Posey and Danny Devito that really gets this film going. An unlikely pairing on the surface, they really do well together, with Devito offering a performance that is somewhat low-key, but utterly charming. There's a sincerity that comes through that made me want to smile, and frankly, to see more of him on screen.
There were a few moments where the comedy falls flat (at least for me), and some wondering where the characters are going during the course of the film. The direction seemed a little detached at times, particularly when dealing with a subject as intimate as it does.
All in all, The Oh in Ohio is what it is. It's not going to change the world of cinema... but then again, maybe it could: if more films were able to be as un-self conscious this one seems to be, maybe we could all start having fun with sex again, rather than layering it in fart jokes or squirreling it away in soulless pornography.
I too saw the film at an AFM screening in Santa Monica, and quite enjoyed it, being a female. I thought the performances were charming, found myself chuckling at several points throughout - and found the "plot twist" at the end spectacular.
Parker Posey was darling, although the woman who played her assistant (Miranda Bailey) received the most laughs overall. And Danny DeVito is always great. Paul Rudd and Mischa Barton round out the cast quite well.
While the film is primarily going to find its following with women, this is a flick that men will enjoy as well. I'll go see it again with my friends once it hits cinemas in the UK.
Parker Posey was darling, although the woman who played her assistant (Miranda Bailey) received the most laughs overall. And Danny DeVito is always great. Paul Rudd and Mischa Barton round out the cast quite well.
While the film is primarily going to find its following with women, this is a flick that men will enjoy as well. I'll go see it again with my friends once it hits cinemas in the UK.
I like it when movies don't treat sex too seriously. It's OK to laugh during love scenes. I applaud any attempt to bring truly "adult-themed" movies to the American audience. But, for some reason, I really wasn't amused by OH! In fact, I found myself frequently glancing at the clock; I barely made it through to the end of the DVD.
OH! was trying so hard (too hard) to be like Sex in the City, what with its jazz-lite music and an improbably sunny depiction of a big city (Cleveland instead of NY). But where Sex in the City was truly adult material treated in an adult manner, OH! seemed childish.
It felt like maybe it had a great original script that attracted talented actors, but then ended up watered down by the executives so that "it will play well to middle America." So instead of a true indie production that pushes boundaries, you get a watered-down, corporate friendly flick that's neither mainstream nor "edgy." Worst of both worlds.
Not sexy. Not funny. Not believable.
OH! was trying so hard (too hard) to be like Sex in the City, what with its jazz-lite music and an improbably sunny depiction of a big city (Cleveland instead of NY). But where Sex in the City was truly adult material treated in an adult manner, OH! seemed childish.
It felt like maybe it had a great original script that attracted talented actors, but then ended up watered down by the executives so that "it will play well to middle America." So instead of a true indie production that pushes boundaries, you get a watered-down, corporate friendly flick that's neither mainstream nor "edgy." Worst of both worlds.
Not sexy. Not funny. Not believable.
There are few redeeming aspects in this showcase of irresponsible, unmotivated filmmaking. The characters, dialog, and situations were nearly as uncomfortable and awkward as the premise of a woman trying to have an orgasm. I don't understand how a film mainly about sex can be so boring, slow, uninteresting and UN-sexy. The pacing is far too slow for what is supposed to be a fun, quirky film, and the editing is loose with some confusing cuts. The entire film felt unnatural, uncomfortable, and bored. A few plot points and lines of dialog were entirely confusing and unclear, and by the end of the film I felt lost. The student and Sherri characters were poorly written and poorly executed – they felt like characters in a book I was reading. They weren't dynamic and didn't feel truly alive and present. Their comments were unnatural and strange, and didn't fit in with the rest of the film. Also, a very confusing aspect of the film was the relationship between Priscilla and Wayne – I won't give everything away, but throughout the whole film I was confused about their past, present, and until the end, future.
So now you might be wondering about those redeeming qualities I mentioned earlier. Paul Rudd is an excellent actor, which somehow manages to show through in this film. However, his skill is weighed down, limited, and ultimately trapped and killed by the poor writing, directing, and overall execution of this story. Danny DeVito is the only thing that manages to rise above this snooze-fest to make it somewhat enjoyable. His character is developed, complex, motivated and real in a world of fake, tired, hollow shells of people. Overall though, this film is slow, barely able to capture and hold attention, and left no impact on my view of the world. I believe that each film is worth watching once – to watch this film again would be a waste of time.
So now you might be wondering about those redeeming qualities I mentioned earlier. Paul Rudd is an excellent actor, which somehow manages to show through in this film. However, his skill is weighed down, limited, and ultimately trapped and killed by the poor writing, directing, and overall execution of this story. Danny DeVito is the only thing that manages to rise above this snooze-fest to make it somewhat enjoyable. His character is developed, complex, motivated and real in a world of fake, tired, hollow shells of people. Overall though, this film is slow, barely able to capture and hold attention, and left no impact on my view of the world. I believe that each film is worth watching once – to watch this film again would be a waste of time.
I would have assumed that "The Oh! in Ohio" was trying to be the Judd Apatow sex comedies for females, but this was released in 2006 just before the Apatow craze began. So now I'm not sure what they were trying to go for.
It's marketed as a comedy but it's more of a drama. The plot line is that Priscilla Chase (Parker Posey) and her husband (Paul Rudd) are in an unhappy marriage because she isn't able to climax. Along with "50 million other women who suffer from orgasmic dysfunction" as the film tells us.
The film moves forward with Posey trying to have an orgasm. I'm assuming these scenes were supposed to provide us laughs but they weren't very funny. The other half of the movie is Rudd living his depressed life as a biology teacher. Finally the film industry has figured out that occasionally there are teachers for subjects other than English, but unfortunately it's in this movie just so we can have him spout the names of some sex organ muscles. Paul Rudd is one of my favourite actors, but the story for his character is extremely poorly done. The humour is so low-key, that I view it more as a drama, so there is no pay-off for his poor character. I might even have to blame this film for Rudd being relegated to buddy comedies now.
There is a lot to not like in this film, but Posey does shine, and some of the "50 million women who suffer from orgasmic dysfunction" might enjoy "The Oh! in Ohio" but probably not many other people will.
It's marketed as a comedy but it's more of a drama. The plot line is that Priscilla Chase (Parker Posey) and her husband (Paul Rudd) are in an unhappy marriage because she isn't able to climax. Along with "50 million other women who suffer from orgasmic dysfunction" as the film tells us.
The film moves forward with Posey trying to have an orgasm. I'm assuming these scenes were supposed to provide us laughs but they weren't very funny. The other half of the movie is Rudd living his depressed life as a biology teacher. Finally the film industry has figured out that occasionally there are teachers for subjects other than English, but unfortunately it's in this movie just so we can have him spout the names of some sex organ muscles. Paul Rudd is one of my favourite actors, but the story for his character is extremely poorly done. The humour is so low-key, that I view it more as a drama, so there is no pay-off for his poor character. I might even have to blame this film for Rudd being relegated to buddy comedies now.
There is a lot to not like in this film, but Posey does shine, and some of the "50 million women who suffer from orgasmic dysfunction" might enjoy "The Oh! in Ohio" but probably not many other people will.
- napierslogs
- 26 जून 2010
- परमालिंक
You are married to the best looking girl in Cleveland, she's clever, beautiful and successful, fulfils her marital duties as often as you like - what more could you want? Jack and Priscilla get on brilliantly but he's concerned about one small problem. If you ask Priscilla if she enjoys their frequent sex she will smile and say she doesn't not enjoy it and then search for a nicer way to say that. The big O evades her, whatever they try. Eventually Jack moves out to rediscover himself and Priscilla makes a visit to the local sex boutique.
The Oh in Ohio is a gloriously enjoyable light comedy, mainstream to the core and not a hint explicit nudity. It's more a case of smiles than belly laughs, and it threatens to lose momentum half way through, but it still represents a solid debut for this director's first feature film. Parker Posey (Kitty from Superman Returns) carries herself well in the lead, transforming herself from ice queen executive to flamboyant, sexually fulfilled woman whose battery-assisted underwear nearly causes her to lose a sales pitch. What could be a difficult role she pulls off with charm and finesse. Her husband Jack (Paul Rudd) goes from being a very depressed teacher back to his almost legendary status for inspiring pupils (including a rather sexually active 18yr old). Pool-guy Danny DeVito, 'caught in a love triangle where the competition is younger and fitter,' is at his most mellow and charming. Somehow this is a film that should have been more than its parts, and although it avoids the usual pitfalls (including a neat sidestep from the expected cheesy ending) it falls short of being the year's comic masterpiece.
I doubt if the Oh in Ohio will do much for women's liberation, sexual or otherwise, but it does manage to be risqué without ever being offensive and will have a certain broad appeal for a good night out (with the girls, or the boys, or just your other half if you are feeling brave!) Possibly a bit tame by non-U.S. standards (given the plot), but nevertheless a scatty bit of fun which should be enjoyed for what it is.
The Oh in Ohio is a gloriously enjoyable light comedy, mainstream to the core and not a hint explicit nudity. It's more a case of smiles than belly laughs, and it threatens to lose momentum half way through, but it still represents a solid debut for this director's first feature film. Parker Posey (Kitty from Superman Returns) carries herself well in the lead, transforming herself from ice queen executive to flamboyant, sexually fulfilled woman whose battery-assisted underwear nearly causes her to lose a sales pitch. What could be a difficult role she pulls off with charm and finesse. Her husband Jack (Paul Rudd) goes from being a very depressed teacher back to his almost legendary status for inspiring pupils (including a rather sexually active 18yr old). Pool-guy Danny DeVito, 'caught in a love triangle where the competition is younger and fitter,' is at his most mellow and charming. Somehow this is a film that should have been more than its parts, and although it avoids the usual pitfalls (including a neat sidestep from the expected cheesy ending) it falls short of being the year's comic masterpiece.
I doubt if the Oh in Ohio will do much for women's liberation, sexual or otherwise, but it does manage to be risqué without ever being offensive and will have a certain broad appeal for a good night out (with the girls, or the boys, or just your other half if you are feeling brave!) Possibly a bit tame by non-U.S. standards (given the plot), but nevertheless a scatty bit of fun which should be enjoyed for what it is.
- Chris_Docker
- 26 जुल॰ 2006
- परमालिंक
"The Oh in Ohio" had a lot of the ingredients to make it a successful film but it didn't quite do it for me. I enjoy the premise of the film as it centers on the Priscilla's sexual awakening. I enjoy Paul Rudd's performance. He is always likable. I commend the film for pairing an unlikely couple together, even though it is not within the norms of Hollywood. However, I found the film to be oddly hollow. While I appreciated the trajectory and character arc of Priscilla and Jack, I also found it difficult to pinpoint the point of the story. Priscilla's narrative felt confident. It knew where it wanted to go. However, Paul Rudd's storyline seems muddied. I wasn't sure how his narrative fit into the grand scheme of the movie. The ending seemed abrupt and unconvincing. It left us a void that the movie should have filled. That said, it is still an enjoyable film. Paul Rudd and Parker Posey are great enough actors to keep us captivated, even if the story doesn't do them justice.
- kelvinho84
- 10 दिस॰ 2012
- परमालिंक
- vixenviewer
- 28 दिस॰ 2006
- परमालिंक
The Oh in Ohio zigs where others zag. It knows the value of not giving the audience what they have come to expect. I saw it at the Provincetown film Festival in their largest venue filled to the brim and steaming like a Bombay sweatshop. But even with all the heat the audience did not twitch. They laughed heartily and some were brought to cackling applause. I was surprised to find myself and my date, my wife of 61 years laughing at a subject that we would dare talk about even in our own bedroom. Without giving anything away by the end we were holding hands a subconscious act brought on by the strong and meaningful romantic quality of the films finale. I am not someone accustomed to the internet, or public commenting on films, but I felt this film deserved to have the support of an old timer like myself. I hope people from all walks of life will find 90 minutes to leave their lives and laugh at the performances of these fine actors. -- My god Liza Minnelli's in it! I can remember when her mother was a child. Go see the Oh in Ohio you won't regret it. It's great.
- brucetheflyer
- 19 जून 2006
- परमालिंक
I am not going to tell you about the plot because there's no plot at all. After the movie ended quite awkwardly, I couldn't help to ask: what the heck is this movie trying to say? It appears like a sex comedy, but the dildo thing is not funny at all, and the cum during the meeting is so old that it becomes quite embarrassing. The affairs between the husband and the student, the wife becomes a slut, and the huge swimming pool of DeVito, all have nothing to do with the main story - wait, actually there's no story at all! Fortunately it runs less than 80 mins.
This is a definitely NOT a SEX COMEDY, don't be deceived by the tag lines.
This is a definitely NOT a SEX COMEDY, don't be deceived by the tag lines.
- smpalmer722
- 7 जन॰ 2007
- परमालिंक
Saw "Oh" last week. The movie is mostly fun, silly at times, warmhearted, and surprisingly poignant in places. The scenes between Posey and Devito made the movie worth seeing. The point of sex--is after all--to serve as some sort of connection at the end of the day--or at least that is what the writer and director seem to be saying. That message is the sort of obvious one. What makes this film stand apart is the director's presentation of sex as just fun sometimes as well without having to feel "dirty" To be fair, the movie is uneven. The marriage of Posey and Rudd seems unrealistic. How could such a self proclaimed stud marry such an ice queen in the first place? Further, how does such a jerk become a biology teacher---a selfless profession if ever there was one. Ultimately, not much there to suggest a coherence. His character felt like a set of convenient levers, not a person. Also, his distinctly crude manner took away from the believability of a relationship between he and Posey. She wears a scarf around her neck and wears suits; he drives a rusted Volvo and looks homeless most of the time. I don't think so.
Posey, however, hit it on the head with a great performance with just the right nuance in both her awkwardness about her frigidity, and the awakened sexual beast. Devito was grand and more human, less cartoonish than in most of his roles. This film made you believe a seriously short, fat, old guy had a realistic shot at romance with a tall, beautiful younger woman.
Barton was fine--nothing to write home about. Her part was perhaps the most predictable of all. Fortunately, she played a HS student and as such, the utter lack of emotional and spiritual development can be attributed to her character's age.
I viewed the film with an audience that was made up largely of women--mid-30s to mid-50s. The laughs were present from that crowd and heartfelt. The adventures with vibrator were appreciated and there were many knowing chuckles along those lines.
One standing ovation to Keith David who played "coach", Rudd's straight man/foil. His poolside scene talking about his wife's vibe was an absolute treasure of weird guy bonding. Brilliant. Heather Graham's cameo was great fun as well.
See it---if for no other reason than supporting an Indy film that isn't too self-conscious for it's own good.
Posey, however, hit it on the head with a great performance with just the right nuance in both her awkwardness about her frigidity, and the awakened sexual beast. Devito was grand and more human, less cartoonish than in most of his roles. This film made you believe a seriously short, fat, old guy had a realistic shot at romance with a tall, beautiful younger woman.
Barton was fine--nothing to write home about. Her part was perhaps the most predictable of all. Fortunately, she played a HS student and as such, the utter lack of emotional and spiritual development can be attributed to her character's age.
I viewed the film with an audience that was made up largely of women--mid-30s to mid-50s. The laughs were present from that crowd and heartfelt. The adventures with vibrator were appreciated and there were many knowing chuckles along those lines.
One standing ovation to Keith David who played "coach", Rudd's straight man/foil. His poolside scene talking about his wife's vibe was an absolute treasure of weird guy bonding. Brilliant. Heather Graham's cameo was great fun as well.
See it---if for no other reason than supporting an Indy film that isn't too self-conscious for it's own good.
The nice thing about this movie is that I will forget that I ever saw it in about a month. It is so dull that it sent me to the concession stand once and to the bathroom once. I really had to go to the bathroom badly. I am glad that I was overpowered by gastrointestinal exigency during this movie, which was another little Indy waste of time. I keep thinking of that producer who explained that if it is not in the script it isn't there. Parker Posey, Heather Graham, and Danny DeVito were all good in this movie;in fact, Heather Graham was better than she has ever been. I felt that if you jettisoned the rest of the characters and started over with these three, you'd might be able work out a plot that would not send you to the lobby to check out the posters of what is coming to the theater next week.
- PeachHamBeach
- 11 जुल॰ 2008
- परमालिंक
- claire-cec
- 19 नव॰ 2012
- परमालिंक
I wanted to like this movie more than I did, but I just didn't. Some of the people at the SXSW fest really enjoyed it, but there was a large majority- such as myself- that almost walked out.
Parker Posey is, well- Parker Posey again. Sometimes I find her funny, but a lot of the time I find her shtick a little tedious, and where I really like her as a supporting player, when she's the lead I start to get a headache. Perhaps that's just me, but if you ever thought she may be a little over the top, this is not the film for you.
Paul Rudd is okay, but he has scenes with Micha Barton, who is to acting what wood is to forests, so there was no hope for those scenes.
The standout for me, surprisingly, was Danny DeVito. He brings a warmth and reality to a supporting role (clearly based on Wallace Shawns character in Annie Hall) that took me by surprise and made me remember why I love him so.
The film itself tries very hard to get noticed, sometimes in that puerile Farrely Brothers HEY LOOK AT ME! kind of way, which I'm sure my 14 year old nephew would enjoy. ("Hey, they're talking about SEX!! Wheeee!") but after a while it made me long for a comedy like, say, Annie Hall or Manhattan (am I dating myself?) where the people are adult and smart and interesting and attractive and don't try so hard to be funny, but just ARE funny.
I'd be interested to see this director/writers next film, hopefully they'll have a little more faith in themselves and a little less need to keep the volume so loud.
Parker Posey is, well- Parker Posey again. Sometimes I find her funny, but a lot of the time I find her shtick a little tedious, and where I really like her as a supporting player, when she's the lead I start to get a headache. Perhaps that's just me, but if you ever thought she may be a little over the top, this is not the film for you.
Paul Rudd is okay, but he has scenes with Micha Barton, who is to acting what wood is to forests, so there was no hope for those scenes.
The standout for me, surprisingly, was Danny DeVito. He brings a warmth and reality to a supporting role (clearly based on Wallace Shawns character in Annie Hall) that took me by surprise and made me remember why I love him so.
The film itself tries very hard to get noticed, sometimes in that puerile Farrely Brothers HEY LOOK AT ME! kind of way, which I'm sure my 14 year old nephew would enjoy. ("Hey, they're talking about SEX!! Wheeee!") but after a while it made me long for a comedy like, say, Annie Hall or Manhattan (am I dating myself?) where the people are adult and smart and interesting and attractive and don't try so hard to be funny, but just ARE funny.
I'd be interested to see this director/writers next film, hopefully they'll have a little more faith in themselves and a little less need to keep the volume so loud.
I recently saw a screening of "The Oh In Ohio" - it is a charming, original, well crafted film. The humor is dished up in the right amounts and in all the right places.
This movie artfully deals with sexuality in a light and refreshing way. It is easy to see why such great talent was attracted to this project. Paul Rudd, Danny Devito, and Parker Posey each gave fantastic and thoughtful performances. Mischa Barton brings a certain ease and freshness to her role that may hint at even greater things to come. The cameo by Liza Minelli was icing on the cake.
There were many funny moments but the scene that still makes me laugh days later features Parker Posey in the boardroom - it was brilliantly acted and directed. All in all this is a very refreshing and original film.
This movie artfully deals with sexuality in a light and refreshing way. It is easy to see why such great talent was attracted to this project. Paul Rudd, Danny Devito, and Parker Posey each gave fantastic and thoughtful performances. Mischa Barton brings a certain ease and freshness to her role that may hint at even greater things to come. The cameo by Liza Minelli was icing on the cake.
There were many funny moments but the scene that still makes me laugh days later features Parker Posey in the boardroom - it was brilliantly acted and directed. All in all this is a very refreshing and original film.
If you love Hollywood romantic comedy formula movies, like 'Pretty Woman' and expect everything to be neatly spelled out and wrapped in a pretty bow stick to watching your Julia Roberts DVD, this one is not for you.
Parker Posey is a delight in the lead role of an advertising executive living in Cleveland with her dishwater dull High School Biology teacher husband played by Paul Rudd.
After ten years in the soulless suburbs and the only Joneses on the block without a pool, life on the surface looks good for the couple. A pretty house with an ultra modern kitchen, her career is on track and she has just been made V.P. at her ad agency, and he is 'getting it' all the time. But what's wrong? That's where our story begins and where it goes is anybodies guess.
The big O in the title refers to one thing, the one Parker's character cannot achieve, and the film explores her journey to see if she can resolve it.
Parker shines, again, and proves to be perfect in the lead. Rudd is solid as the dumpy husband. The supporting cast is a delight too and includes Danny Devito, who appears to play a Louish character ala 'Taxi,' at first, and Liza Minelli, (yes, it really is her!) and Heather Graham in an unbilled supporting role and who has never having looked better on screen.
It is one part feminist statement about owning ones body, one part slap stick comedy, the pager sequence could have been part of a 'Three's Company' plot (if it had aired on cable and been R rated) and one part breezy romantic comedy with an unlikely romantic counter part for Posey this film is a delight and total original. .
The best thing about the film is that defies convention and is thoroughly enjoyable in the process. There is no great moral dilemmas, which if you are used to Hollywood formula appear telegraphed and then never materializes, or obnoxious 'I am Woman' statements. The kind of statements that a lot of message movies in which the film maker is going to 'educate the ignorant masses' often falls victim to.
Parker Posey is a delight in the lead role of an advertising executive living in Cleveland with her dishwater dull High School Biology teacher husband played by Paul Rudd.
After ten years in the soulless suburbs and the only Joneses on the block without a pool, life on the surface looks good for the couple. A pretty house with an ultra modern kitchen, her career is on track and she has just been made V.P. at her ad agency, and he is 'getting it' all the time. But what's wrong? That's where our story begins and where it goes is anybodies guess.
The big O in the title refers to one thing, the one Parker's character cannot achieve, and the film explores her journey to see if she can resolve it.
Parker shines, again, and proves to be perfect in the lead. Rudd is solid as the dumpy husband. The supporting cast is a delight too and includes Danny Devito, who appears to play a Louish character ala 'Taxi,' at first, and Liza Minelli, (yes, it really is her!) and Heather Graham in an unbilled supporting role and who has never having looked better on screen.
It is one part feminist statement about owning ones body, one part slap stick comedy, the pager sequence could have been part of a 'Three's Company' plot (if it had aired on cable and been R rated) and one part breezy romantic comedy with an unlikely romantic counter part for Posey this film is a delight and total original. .
The best thing about the film is that defies convention and is thoroughly enjoyable in the process. There is no great moral dilemmas, which if you are used to Hollywood formula appear telegraphed and then never materializes, or obnoxious 'I am Woman' statements. The kind of statements that a lot of message movies in which the film maker is going to 'educate the ignorant masses' often falls victim to.
The Oh in Ohio is a good, fun, and light movie. It doesn't go very far, but it manages to entertain for the duration of the film. While The OH in OHio is about some scandalous things : masturbation and mistresses among other sex related things, it manages to keep it silly and avoids cringe-worthy scenes. Dare I say that it wouldn't be that bad if you watched with your parents. The actors help keep the film afloat. Paul Rudd is his usual awkward and low-key comical self, while Parker Posey, the master of quirky, also gives me a good laugh. Her character is super endearing, innocent and sweet. Then there's Danny DeVito who plays the male version of Parker Posey's character. And finally, Mischa Barton brings a little oomph, a little scandal and a little sex to it all. There is very little conflict in this film, which isn't a bad thing. It is refreshing as it seems that the film is not trying too hard to take its viewer on a roller coaster in attempts to keep them constantly entertained. Therefore, if you are looking for something upbeat, not too intense and that defines one meaning of love and identity then this is your movie!
What gives with the talented Parker Posey? She can make great films with incredible comic timing (example: her great work in Christopher Guest's films) and then barely make a dent with crappy roles in crappy films like "The Oh in Ohio". This movie, which is about a young woman's quest for the elusive orgasm, is pretty much the same territory explored in "ShortBus" this year, right down to the same joke involving accidental triggering of a vibrator. I bought this film used, and should have suspected that it was a turkey if it was being sold at rental stores a mere four weeks after its DVD release. Indeed it is a turkey. Whyt Liza Minnelli, Paul Rudd, and Heather Graham would even want to be part of this escapes me. Parker? Get a better agent...fast!
I too saw this at SXSW and while the film did get some laughs I attributed it more to a typical "friendly" festival screening. This is in no way a good movie. How they got this cast for a screenplay like this is surprising. Fist-time Director Billy Kent lives up to his first time billing by doing nothing to liven up the limp dialog and sitcom storyline either. My girlfriend and I couldn't figure out why we are supposed to care about Parker Posey's character. Save for Paul Rudd's nice performance there is little to recommend about this weak attempt. It all feels so much a rehash of other, better (and equally bad) films. Lame dick / dildo jokes and using a pager as a vibrator all seem pretty tired.
- mirvingfan
- 18 मार्च 2006
- परमालिंक