Jack O'Lantern

I seen it,it just came out on DVD, how can you, I mean the person who said it was one of the worst movies ever, say that. It's not the best movie,but,its not the worst movie, the acting is a little over the top,but the story line is good,and the director angles,lighting,and all the other things that the director has to do was pretty good. The mask did look like it was made in a hurry,but the special effects was good, they did not have a lot of money for it,so hopefully the next movie ill be better. The music is better then the average horror flick.The killings are bloody. It has a feel like Friday The 13th,mHalloween put-together,like I said it is not the worst movie ever made.

Saw it once and that's about all I needed for the next 10,000 years. Really really bad. Maybe if it had some female nudity it would be worth the one star I had to give it. Think I paid about 8 bucks for this which was probably the same amount of money needed for the movies budget. I could have acted better than the people in the film! Just awful.

So if you see this dvd at the store do yourself a favor and keep on walking. Do the world a favor and destroy it!

I sat through the entire movie and it was very very painful. This movie was awful.

I enjoy horror movies and like many "low budget" films. But this has to be one of the worst movies I have ever seen in my life. It is awful. The acting was terrible, the fade between scenes was so lame it was as if using a home video camera.

For a lower budget horror movie I would recommend Mother's Day. Even the Sleepaway camp trilogy movies.

But for anyone who likes this garbage, I would recommend another LOW Budget piece of crap- Hunting Humans (at least it has a good story with an excellent plot twist but the acting sucked) or one of those lame slumber party massacre movies where they use the same EXACT killing scene in several movies.

I am learning real fast if it comes from Lion's Gate, it is going to be CRAP! (just like those paragon pictures from the 80's!)

I notice some people have given this movie good reviews? Well, in my opinion Lions Gate should be sued under the Trades Description act. What a waste of money. The acting is pathetic, the camera work amateurish, the plot dull and the dialogue stinks. Any good reviews of this movie can only have been submitted by the director or so called actors. I cannot see how anyone who enjoys a good horror movie could sit through this, and before you ask, no I didn't. About 20 minutes was all I could take. On the plus side, the cover art does look quite good. If you need to watch this type of movie then go for something like Wrong Turn or House of 1000 Corpses. Watching this trash is a complete waste of time and you should demand your money back from the rental store.

Okay, up front let me just say, that the (completly random) shots of the pumpkin monster weren't half bad (at least until you hear in the special features that it took the director MONTHS to make it...) The film itself has no semblance of a cohesive plot, with utterly inexplicable and random threads thrown around with reckless abandon. The characters are all two dimensional and seem to have come right out of any bargain basement screen writing guide. There is the token black guy, the token asshole, the token bitch, token religious figure (who may have been the worst actor to ever grace a c-list horror film) etc etc etc. The movie ends as abruptly as possible, for apparently no reason other than the sun coming up, and goes onto one of the most half assed "hope someone wants a sequel" moments I've ever seen. Words cannot describe how tacked on, and utterly ridiculous the last few minutes are. This one isn't even worth it for the kitsch value. I fully support and love indie cinema, and always encourage folks to follow their dreams, but this time, it just produced a heaping pile of pumpkin innards.