[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro

Back to Gaya

  • 2004
  • PG
  • 1 घं 31 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
5.2/10
1.9 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
Back to Gaya (2004)
Home Video Trailer from First Look
trailer प्ले करें2:07
1 वीडियो
4 फ़ोटो
एनिमेशनकंप्यूटर एनिमेशनफ़ैंटेसी

अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंThe beautiful world of Gaya is home to a community of creatures, who are much smaller than humans, but who have an uncanny resemblance to them. But the Gayans are facing imminent danger. Som... सभी पढ़ेंThe beautiful world of Gaya is home to a community of creatures, who are much smaller than humans, but who have an uncanny resemblance to them. But the Gayans are facing imminent danger. Someone has stolen the magic stone called Dalamite without which this world is doomed. Two Ga... सभी पढ़ेंThe beautiful world of Gaya is home to a community of creatures, who are much smaller than humans, but who have an uncanny resemblance to them. But the Gayans are facing imminent danger. Someone has stolen the magic stone called Dalamite without which this world is doomed. Two Gayans named Boo and Zino embark on a dangerous mission to track down and recover the stone.... सभी पढ़ें

  • निर्देशक
    • Lenard Fritz Krawinkel
    • Holger Tappe
  • लेखक
    • Jan Berger
    • Don McEnery
    • Bob Shaw
  • स्टार
    • Patrick Stewart
    • Emily Watson
    • Glenn Wrage
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    5.2/10
    1.9 हज़ार
    आपकी रेटिंग
    • निर्देशक
      • Lenard Fritz Krawinkel
      • Holger Tappe
    • लेखक
      • Jan Berger
      • Don McEnery
      • Bob Shaw
    • स्टार
      • Patrick Stewart
      • Emily Watson
      • Glenn Wrage
    • 27यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 14आलोचक समीक्षाएं
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
    • पुरस्कार
      • 2 कुल नामांकन

    वीडियो1

    The Snurks (aka. Back to Gaya, aka. Boo, Zino & the Snurks )
    Trailer 2:07
    The Snurks (aka. Back to Gaya, aka. Boo, Zino & the Snurks )

    फ़ोटो3

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार46

    बदलाव करें
    Patrick Stewart
    Patrick Stewart
    • Albert Drollinger
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Emily Watson
    Emily Watson
    • Alanta
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Glenn Wrage
    Glenn Wrage
    • Zino
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Alan Marriott
    Alan Marriott
    • Boo
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Bob Saker
    • Mayor
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    • …
    Lorelei King
    Lorelei King
    • Female Gayan
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    • …
    Kate Robbins
    Kate Robbins
    • Female Gayan
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    • …
    John Guerrasio
    • Galger
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Redd Pepper
    • Bramph
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    • (as Red Pepper)
    John Schwab
    John Schwab
    • Zeck
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Stephan Lander
    • Professor N. Icely
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Claudia Lössl
    • E.N.I.A.C.
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Dimitri Kyrianos
    • Billy
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Dan Russell
    • Fred
    • (English version)
    • (वॉइस)
    • …
    Michael Herbig
    Michael Herbig
    • Boo
    • (German version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Vanessa Petruo
    Vanessa Petruo
    • Alanta
    • (German version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Sebastian Höffner
    • Zeck
    • (German version)
    • (वॉइस)
    Torsten Lennie Münchow
    • Zino
    • (German version)
    • (वॉइस)
    • (as Torsten Münchow)
    • निर्देशक
      • Lenard Fritz Krawinkel
      • Holger Tappe
    • लेखक
      • Jan Berger
      • Don McEnery
      • Bob Shaw
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं27

    5.21.9K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    6GerZah

    Nice try, but not far enough ...

    I've heard the producers say: "Hey, we don't want to be 'like Pixar' or like anything else ... !"

    OK. But in 2004 you have to reach certain technical standards. And the makers of "Gaya" didn't. The kinematics is wooden, the camera movements make you dizzy and the lip-sync is disastrous. I mean -- this is a German CGI movie, so why are the German voices out of sync? Even movies like "Shrek" or "Ice Age" have been dubbed with German voices without visible glitches like that.

    Aside from the technique: It's a nice animation film, but the plot is a bit thin and the characters are a bit weak. "Back to Gaya" is OK, but it's not more than that.
    7Jumping Jack Flash

    definitely above average

    Back to Gaya certainly cannot match with Shrek 2 or Monster Inc. but keep in mind that in comparison this film is a rather 'cheap' movie. With the funding they had, the makers certainly did a great job!

    The main positive aspect of the movie is that the makers did not apply the usual scheme of black and white. All the characters have certain strengths and weaknesses which add some shades of grey. The hero is bold but incredibly stupid. His companion is more of a shy guy yet he is quite resourceful.

    Especially the introduction of the black haired Gayans teaches the kids that prejudices and discrimination because of certain bodily features are wrong and unfair.

    BtG offers colourful family entertainment. It's funny, exciting and it even conveys certain moral values to the viewer.

    7 out of 10
    8brentkincaid

    Terrific

    This movie is so cute! It has all the stuff the rest of the CGI animated stuff has except for the humor displayed. But, we must keep in mind this is the first German CGI animated flick ever. So, maybe some of their humor is different from ours in the USA. Still, it makes it to nice, fun level.

    I loved all the characters, and the facial characteristics of them were wonderful and a delight to see.

    I will admit the rats in the chase sequence would be a bit scary for the wee ones, but I saw Bambi and cried my eyes out at their age. So, I think maybe the kiddies will be tough enough for this.

    I give it an 8 out of 10. Keep the kids under about eight from watching it. The rest? You've said worse around your kids by that time. Let them have a romp through Gaya, why not?
    2jnaradzay

    An allegory that needs psychotherapy

    Let me start by saying that the animated movie Snurks. Back to Gaya should not be watched by children. Unless you want to explain why the mean little snurk calls people a "putz". Or why the movie is dark and dreary like a new Batman movie. In order to enjoy this movie you must understand that this is a religious allegory with a some very bad ethnic references, the requisite "a female can be a hero too" story line, and a cookie cutter plot.

    As far as a CG movie it is good. Not very good, but it has some terrific details. If you like to see pimples, pores, a stray nose hair, and blemishes then you will be impressed by the graphics. The bonus feature is kind of neat because you can watch how they build a skeleton, add "skin", texture, muscle movement, and facial features.

    Did I already state that this is not a movie for kids? The story involves a "creator" (Patrick "Jean Luc Picard"), a mythical land where good battles evil (Eden, er, Goya), the good guys need "the light", ("dalamite"). The dalamite gets stolen by an evil genius with a limp and (don't be shocked) a big, bald head!! Lemme explain: evil will take away the light and you have to find the creator to get it back. If you don't get it back then you will be a putz (they said it, not me). Explain that to your kids.

    Whose bright idea was it to give the poor little Snurks a shot glass filled with a Mickey? That's right, the Snurks get drugged by a tank-top wearing bar owner. I'm no censor but I know for a fact that cleavage does not belong in a kids movie.

    Just to keep adults interested, the artists have decided to show you lot of the barmaid's cartoon cleavage and sagging you-know-whats. I know for another fact that sagging you-know-whats do not belong in a kids movie. And the barmaid's male lackey gets yelled at, scolded, called a putz, then kicked in the head. Way too much violence.

    And they didn't miss a chance to make fun of fat people, short people, and anyone that looked different than heros. Sure, they had to cooperate to get back to Eden, er, Goya, but the snurk leader still had to bribe the "creator" to get equal treatment.

    And why does "666" keep popping up in the background? Did I like it? Not really. I wish I didn't see it with my kids. What a putz (their words, not mine) I am.
    onwa

    decent, but far from great

    Well, I went to see this movie at a 10 a.m. showing before it got canned, and I was the only one in the cinema. So much for the trouble I went through in order to see this flick.

    Well turns that the 5 stars it received are justified. It's a movie that isn't really bad, but makes you cringe when you think what could have been considering ist potential. The Visuals are very good at times and not so good at others. The main technical problem of this movie is the rather unrefined degree of animation (crappy would be to harsh a description to use) which is displayed during the characters movement and them talking (lip sync, facial animation/expression, eye movement, etc..).

    The character's movements are either motion captured and therefore very smooth or handanimated. This mixture can work quite well, but it only works when you do a good job animating and blending these two styles in with each other so that nobody notices. Walking and other (relatively) easily capturable movements are done well, yet when it comes to complicated action scenes, with characters being thrown through air, holding on to the hood of a car the animation is poor and wooden. There is no persistent, "believeable" movement going on. In Toy Story for example characters did'nt necessarily move according to reality but they behaved in a unique and in the toy setting consistent as well as beleivable manner. Some polishing would have been necessary yet it didn't happen.

    The next problem are facial expressions weren't anything spectacular either. They were acceptable, which unfortunately isn't enough for an animated flick whose main medium to convey the protagonists emotion is facial expression and therefore fails. On the other hand there weren't that many emotional scenes. Actually I can think of only one: the one where one guy tells the other and vice versa what they believe sucks about their friendship. that's it - no death, no loss, nothing to choke you up or get you involved.

    The worst of the technical flaws, though is the downright bad or rather the lack of lip sync.

    I read some comments here on IMDB before I went to watch this film and therefore my attention was raised on this matter, maybe it biased my perception - but only for the first minutes. After that I was convinced that the head animator must have been blind. In a german movie I expect the german voice overs to be lip synced correctly. I mean you can even have a programm interpreting speech as lip movements and they do a decent job(Deus Ex 1 & 2 for example), but this was so totally off that it must have been on purpose. As it turns out well 15 minutes into the movie or so, one of the main protagonists says something in english and is perfectly in lip sync. From then on its clear that the facial animation was entirely done for english. You then could even read from the lips what they said. Well that's an answer but no excuse, as others already stated, Shrek for example has the "handicap" but does an excellent job. Though some of the voice actors aren't first rate, which leads to some poor voice acting at times (the princess for example). This is really unforgivable and really degrades the exprience.

    By the way, was I the only one who thought that "Buu" was cross-eyed?

    The story wasn't that great either. Not only was it uninteresting and predicatable but it just wasn't convincing at all. I mean the villains motivation was right out hilarious. Poor character development alongside with a strange pacing of events managed to keep you from getting drawn in. In Pixar movies the stories are always well thought of, structured in a logical, interesting way and you kinda know what they're trying to get at. Also the story is interesting enough to keep you going even if the visuals would suck. Here we have few to no jokes which aren't even funny and worse, no themes like love, fear or friendship are explored beyond a superficial level. Not that I'm expecting a great depth in a children's movie, yet some, at least convincing, plausible depth would is something I expect and certainly most children see it the same way.

    So this movie that has a medicore story some more or less severe animational issues, nevertheless it did enjoy it,and so will the audience for which it is intended.

    But if you are expecting something like Monster, Inc. keep looking for Shrek 2 or wait till this hits the shelf at your local video store.

    The only sad part to this movie is that all the dedication as well as hardwork the creators put in it show a potential which can be seen in glimpses throughout the movie is destroyed by the shortcomings of this movie. With a better script , better dialogue and more time to fine tune the animation as well as a fixed lip sync this movie could have been real good.

    Hopefully, the next time, the team who put this together will overcome these flaws mentioned above and once they accomplish this we're in for a real treat!

    इस तरह के और

    Lissi und der wilde Kaiser
    5.1
    Lissi und der wilde Kaiser
    The Ugly Duckling and Me!
    5.4
    The Ugly Duckling and Me!
    Slipp Jimmy Fri
    5.9
    Slipp Jimmy Fri
    The Ugly Duckling and Me!
    6.4
    The Ugly Duckling and Me!
    Code Name: Emerald
    5.9
    Code Name: Emerald
    Aftershock
    4.8
    Aftershock
    Beavis and Butt-Head Do America
    6.8
    Beavis and Butt-Head Do America
    Stay Tuned
    6.3
    Stay Tuned
    A Boy and His Dog
    6.4
    A Boy and His Dog
    Fearless
    7.6
    Fearless
    गुलाम बेलगाम
    7.0
    गुलाम बेलगाम
    Man
    7.4
    Man

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      This was Michael Kamen's last score. He died before he could complete it, and his orchestrators filled out the unfinished sketches.
    • क्रेज़ी क्रेडिट
      In a scene during the credits, Galger calls Albert from a cellphone, to give him new ideas for writing further episodes for 'Zeck and Boo'.
    • कनेक्शन
      Featured in Jambareeqi Reviews: Boo, Zino and the Snurks (2013)
    • साउंडट्रैक
      No Small Wonder
      Words by Don Black

      Music by Michael Kamen

      Performed by Katy Krykant "Lady K", Andy Lewis, Bobby Harrison and Stefan Redtenbacher

      Produced, Mixed, and Arranged by Rupert Christie

      K-MAN CORP/SONY/ATV MUSIC PUBLISHING LLC (BMI)-50%

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल15

    • How long is Boo, Zino & the Snurks?Alexa द्वारा संचालित

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 18 मार्च 2004 (जर्मनी)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • जर्मनी
      • स्पेन
      • यूनाइटेड किंगडम
      • ब्राज़ील
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
    • आधिकारिक साइट
      • Warner Bros. (Germany)
    • भाषा
      • जर्मन
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • Boo, Zino & the Snurks
    • उत्पादन कंपनियां
      • Ambient Entertainment GmbH
      • Recorded Picture Company (RPC)
      • Morena Films
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    बॉक्स ऑफ़िस

    बदलाव करें
    • दुनिया भर में सकल
      • $28,44,511
    IMDbPro पर बॉक्स ऑफ़िस की विस्तार में जानकारी देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      • 1 घं 31 मि(91 min)
    • रंग
      • Color
    • ध्वनि मिश्रण
      • DTS
      • Dolby Digital EX
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 2.35 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.