Falling Angels

Basically, the movie is about a family (parents and three daughters) in the 1960's as they deal with issues from the past and the present. There is also a secret that is eventually revealed, and sort of explains why things are the way they are.

The casting was good, everyone played their character well (mostly), except I sort of agree with the other reviewer when they said that you really don't 'dislike' the father, even though his acts can sometimes be inappropriate.

There are some scenes I liked with some of the individual characters, and the cinematography is nice. I especially liked the opening and the closing scenes.

Overall, I didn't like some of the story. But if you like any of the actors or are just somewhat interested, it is probably worth seeing.

Yet another would be shocking but predictable expose of repressed lives in the 1950's (oops, 1960's. Maybe the revolution arrived a bit late here in Canada). The father is meant to represent all things wicked and patriarchal, but he comes across as too likable and well meaning to really pull this off--I just couldn't buy that he would keep his young family locked up in a bomb shelter for two weeks and force them to drink dishwater or start knocking down the furniture because he'd been told that he misspelled a word in a Scrabble game (although if I'd had to live with that passive-aggressive little bunch maybe I'd start tossing around stuff too). And I think there should be a moratorium on the "ironic" use of 1950's ads in modern films--I suspect that people who actually lived in that era were just as skeptical of their ads as we are of our own.

That said, there were some elements of the film that worked. The open concept houses with shag rugs were dead on. The very strained relationship between the most difficult of the three daughters, Lou, and her father was convincing--in many families there does seem one kid who brings out the worst qualities of a parent and acts as a kind of scapegoat for the other siblings. And even though it seemed a bit gratuitous, I enjoyed the the very sick and twisted Ron and Reg subplot--pure Barbara Gowdry.

Overall, it was worth a look, but I was glad I waited until it came out on DVD.

an absolute dream-like beauty to this film. It possesses the best of say a Wim Wenders masterpiece, coupled with the narrative of a whacked-out indie great. Every moment is fully realized........never forcing the viewer to "feel" anything. heartbreaking and hilarious, with art direction that is a knock-out! The direction and the acting were gorgeous (especially the stunning Katharine Isabelle!). Both the narrative and pictorial silences in this film say so much more than most films do in the entirety. So much is left to the viewers politics and prejudices, it almost feels interactive (granted I grew up during this period, so that probably has a lot to do with it). If you're a child of the 60's / 70's (or a dysfunctional home.......and who isn't.........) this is a must see.

This is billed as a comedy, but it is not. It is a story of a highly dysfunctional family.

The house is decorated in the most ugly 1960s style you could conceive. The furnishings came from a thrift store.

The father is a bully, though he stops just short of beating his family. He threatens them with guns. He is a bit like the Great Santini, pushing his family around as if he were a drill Sargent. He later becomes an alcoholic.

Mom is an alcoholic, barely conscious.

The three daughters are fat, and not very bright. One smokes non-stop. One gets pregnant by a gross older man. They are selfish and unkind to each other.

Only one character is in the least sympathetic, the fattest daughter, a lesbian, with a flair for carpentry.

There are a couple of awkward sex scenes which are funny in their dreadfulness.

The movie opens with mom in a casket. The film winds back in time to explore how that came to be.

It is a bitter film, not a funny one.

Another Canadian offering at the film festival from director Scott Smith who also did indie film `rollercoaster' a few years ago. It's based on a book by Barbara Gowdy and was filmed in Saskatchewan though it takes place in Ontario. The story centers around 3 sisters in their late teens, still living at home under the imperious rule of their father, Jim. He has long since succeeded in bullying his wife, Mary, into a defeated alcoholic who spends her days in her dressing gown, staring remotely at the television and sipping whiskey from the ever present coffee cup. He continues his tyrannical reign over his daughters but the year is 1969 and things are changing. Authority is being challenged and the traditional `father rules the roost' values are being shot down left and right. The sisters are all trying to discover who they are and how to break free but are tied to the family out of duty and concern for their mother.

The family doesn't talk about secrets. They bury them and there lies a lot of the problems. There was a firstborn son that died in a `fall' over Niagara Falls and then there was a two week enforced confinement in a bomb shelter that the father built in the back yard about 10 years ago. We see this through some flash back sequences. Norma is the oldest, chubby, plain, she is the one that takes care of everyone else. She follows father's rules like a good girl yet there's a lot about herself that she won't accept. Lou is the middle smart mouthed daughter, bent on rebellion. She sees her father with other women, she hangs out with a new boy in school, riding in his van, smoking dope. She hates her father and loves yet has contempt for her mother's weakness. Sandy is the youngest, blonde, pretty and sweet looking and seems attached to her mother. Sandy sews her own clothes, high necklines, ruffles and peter pan collars but wears a ton of makeup and has no compunction about starting up an affair with a married man of her father's age. It certainly doesn't seem to be her first time either.

The movie starts off showing the mother in a coffin and the father drunkenly lurching into the funeral parlour. The rest of the movie retraces the steps that lead up to the mother's death on New Year's Eve. The actors are all very believable in their roles. Miranda Richardson plays the remote mother, so immersed in apathy and alcohol that she can't even react to anything in her daughters' lives though she does show glimpses of not being as oblivious as we might think she is. The flashbacks in the bomb shelter show her a little more spirited than she is now but the destruction of her self esteem has already begun. Callum Keith Rennie plays the bully control freak father with just the right balance of domination, control and a glimmer of insecurity and affection for his family that does lurk under the surface. Katharine Isabelle plays Lou, she was also in Ginger Snaps and she's terrific.

The director stayed after the movie for a few questions and when asked where he got all the `stuff', the houses and props and cars, replied `We filmed it in Saskatchewan!' implying Sask. was stuck in the past. Made the audience chuckle. Wherever and however they got all the props, they did a great job. The whole style of the movie was SO 1960's Canada as I remember it right down to the coffee cups, the turquoise blue paint in the kitchen and the wood paneling and stripey tweed carpet in the rec room. The clothes had me in flashbacks as well. The ending was a bit ambiguous but it comes down to whether the girls will reject or stick by their father in spite of everything. Again, I can't see it being everyone's taste but if you like Indie films, you should see it. Canadian films have come a long way but you know, you can still pick one out of the crowd. There's just a certain atmosphere and I think that comes from the fact that most of them are made with independent money and means and don't have the gloss and high budgets that Hollywood movies have. There are good actors, both Canadian and from other countries. The writing is getting better as well but there is just always something quintessentially Canadian about them, this one included.