[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro

Issues 101

  • 2002
  • Unrated
  • 1 घं 30 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
3.5/10
597
आपकी रेटिंग
Issues 101 (2002)
ड्रामारोमांस

अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA gay transfer student pledges to a predominantly straight fraternity where his "straight-with-issues" big brother has a steady girlfriend but privately relishes man-to-man sex.A gay transfer student pledges to a predominantly straight fraternity where his "straight-with-issues" big brother has a steady girlfriend but privately relishes man-to-man sex.A gay transfer student pledges to a predominantly straight fraternity where his "straight-with-issues" big brother has a steady girlfriend but privately relishes man-to-man sex.

  • निर्देशक
    • John Lincoln
  • लेखक
    • John Lincoln
  • स्टार
    • Michael Rozman
    • Dennis W. Rittenhouse Jr.
    • Jeff Sublett
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    3.5/10
    597
    आपकी रेटिंग
    • निर्देशक
      • John Lincoln
    • लेखक
      • John Lincoln
    • स्टार
      • Michael Rozman
      • Dennis W. Rittenhouse Jr.
      • Jeff Sublett
    • 23यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 3आलोचक समीक्षाएं
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • फ़ोटो4

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार45

    बदलाव करें
    Michael Rozman
    • Joe Phillips
    Dennis W. Rittenhouse Jr.
    • Christian
    Jeff Sublett
    • Michael
    Jason Boegh
    Jason Boegh
    • Steve Radberry
    Yolanda Johnston
    • Kim
    Jeremy Smith
    • Todd
    Gary Castro Churchwell
    Gary Castro Churchwell
    • Bill (fraternity president)
    Trevor Murphy
    Trevor Murphy
    • Tim
    Kelly Clarkson
    Kelly Clarkson
    • Crystal
    Larissa Kern
    • Lisa Lindbert
    Chris Benson
    • Justin
    Brian Swinehart
    Brian Swinehart
    • Bo
    Dan Callaway
    • Jeff
    Michael Haboush
    • Nick
    Brad Murphy
    • Scott- Pi Pi Rho pres
    Todd Pressler
    • Student reporter
    Chad Dossett
    • Ryan
    Justin Crumley
    • Chad
    • निर्देशक
      • John Lincoln
    • लेखक
      • John Lincoln
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं23

    3.5597
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    1bew_50

    Worst movie of all times

    Issues 101 is without a doubt the worst movie ever made, with absolutely no redeeming values except for a few shots of some nice boy ass, and proves once again that anyone with a cheap video cam and a few friends can make a film. Not only is the story absurd and the acting so amateurish that it rivals the worst kindergarten play, but the characters are so stereotyped that gay and straight people alike will be offended by the depiction of the characters. It was like watching a train wreck; I could not avert my eyes and I was horrified the entire time. God only knows why I watched the whole movie. Most gay actors are capable of portraying straight men with no problem; these guys were not. The gay characters were total flames, vapid and shallow and able to fall in love and have their hearts broken in the time it takes most of us to enjoy a good meal. The so-called straight characters were not far behind. One expected them all to drop their pants at any given moment and have an orgy in the fraternity house. To wit, did the writer, director or any of the people involved in the making of this trash ever go to college or ever go inside a fraternity house??? Quite frankly, I've seen more convincing acting and stories in gay porn films.

    In short, I cannot say enough bad things about this piece of garbage and would exhort any reader to avoid this movie like the plague.
    gar714

    This is SO bad, and yet mysteriously enjoyable on some level.

    This is SO bad, and yet mysteriously enjoyable on some level. When I am not guffawing at the plot "twists," I am mesmerized by the miscasting. The age spread for college youth is abysmal. Joe looks old enough to be faculty.

    Highlights for me include: 1. The musical sequences. 2. The ship on the door of the frat house. 3. Every time Steve pulls out "the book." 4. The dogma. 5. The bird track.

    Get some crackers and your favorite processed cheese spread and give this sick puppy another viewing. Invite some friends over. It could be a great theme party. If you have a camcorder you and your guests could shoot a sequel. Don't forget the bird track.
    2poltguy

    Yeah, this films got 101 issues...all of them bad.

    Okay, just like most of the other reviewers, I can find very little positive to say. Joe was too old to be a "frat boy". Christian was so obviously flaming gay I'm surprised he didn't spontaneous combust on screen. the set was obviously an empty house rented for the feature because no frat house is gonna have all those empty walls, and empty bookshelves. Some of the scenes, everyone was crowded very tightly. there was no chemistry between ANY of the players. the music and lyrics was laughable. The Pi Pi Rho house was just a wall with people standing in front of it. The Sig fraternity president was go gay there's no way anyone could NOT know that he was. the "hazing" incident, while kinda hot in a gay porn kind of way, was entirely unbelievable. The pace was plodding and slow and then suddenly rushed. The movie ending left the whole thing feeling incomplete. I read on here they ran out of money, that probably explains that.

    I gave it a two just because some of the actors are very easy on the eyes, and there's some nice ass shots, as well as one sorta hot sex scene and few full frontals (or maybe just one, i forget actually).

    I would not rent this. I certainly wouldn't buy it under any circumstances. I think whoever made this film had the best of intentions at heart. unfortunately, best intentions do NOT a good movie make.
    1dj-58

    Rent this movie for the special features!

    Rent this movie for the special features! Now, this IS the single worst movie I have ever seen; it looks like it was made with a home camcorder, the acting is terrible, the plot is stupid, the characters are hollow, the script is inane, and the sex is gratuitous and poorly done. But the compelling reason to rent this DVD are the actor interviews in the Special Features, which are like a Christopher Guest movie come to life. The "actors" self-serious comments about their "work" are hilarious, and truly worth the rental. Their unintentionally deadpan delivery, filled with "ums" and pauses, after which they completely contradict the inane statement that came before, are Christopher Guest at his best, only they are real. For anyone who thinks Mr. Guest just makes his characters up, rent this movie. True, the interviews are funnier if you have watched the movie, but that would be such a painful task that you can watch the bonus material by itself.
    4Havan_IronOak

    This film should be mandatory viewing for film makers.

    Unfortunately, this film should be mandatory viewing for film makers, so that they can see what mistakes NOT to make in their films.

    Issues 101 has real problems. As a romantic drama it's a failure. Seeing this film only a few hours after watching Andy Warhol's Trash led me to question why Trash is so riveting (albeit in a sick car-crash sort of way) while Issues 101 required real force of will to watch to the bitter end.

    Neither film has well scripted dialogue and yet they couldn't be more different in their audience impact. One is fascinating to watch and one is painful to watch.

    Somehow in Trash we see beyond the flaws and imperfections and see that there is truth (in this case what it must have really been like to be in a dead end relationship with a junkie in late 60's NYC)

    In Issues 101, we see no such truth. The reality of the digital video contrasts wildly with the inane dialogue (lacking in both sense and substance). The result is an insipid film lacking in truth, excitement or interest. The flaws were so off-putting as to keep yanking the viewer back to the `real world' and not allowing for the willing suspension of disbelief that works for most films.

    The REAL problem for me with Issues 101 is that it gives me a terrible case of the `might-have-beens.' For the most part the actors were pleasing to the eye and the ideas presented in the story could have been told so much better.

    On the surface, a story about a fraternity pledge that somehow gets through a chink in his frat brother's straight façade, the frat brother setting the pledge up with his younger fraternal gay brother to take some of the pressure off, and the jealousy that ensues are all great plot elements. However in this film almost none of it works. The sex with the supposedly straight brother goes way too far without an adequate `gosh was I drunk set-up'. The whirlwind speed with which the pledge and the younger brother get seriously involved happens way too quickly. And finally the pledge causing all these issues is neither handsome enough nor charming enough to make us believe that either brother would be interested in him.

    To make matters worse there were scenes that were totally unmotivated and others that were totally unnecessary.

    I understand that this film ran out of money near the end and so much was lost in the director's vision but overall what was left is nearly unwatchable and actually painful to sit through.

    इस तरह के और

    Efterskalv
    6.5
    Efterskalv
    My Brother Tom
    6.8
    My Brother Tom
    Plein sud
    5.8
    Plein sud
    Deutschstunde
    6.8
    Deutschstunde
    The Time of Indifference
    5.3
    The Time of Indifference
    El primo
    6.0
    El primo
    Mir v drugom izmerenii
    5.9
    Mir v drugom izmerenii
    Ragazzi fuori
    6.9
    Ragazzi fuori
    Farligt venskab
    5.6
    Farligt venskab
    Gymna somata
    6.0
    Gymna somata
    Les naufragés
    6.3
    Les naufragés
    The Hour of Living
    5.8
    The Hour of Living

    संबंधित रुचियां

    Mahershala Ali and Alex R. Hibbert in Moonlight (2016)
    ड्रामा
    Ingrid Bergman and Humphrey Bogart in Casablanca (1942)
    रोमांस

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      Kelly Clarkson's debut.
    • गूफ़
      When Justin reaches under the table for Joe's gift he has a drink in his hand. After a cut the drink has vanished.
    • भाव

      Bill: Well, according to the bylaws, you have to give elected officials three months to prove themselves before talk of ANY impeachment can occur.

      Jeff: Meanwhile, this damn fool is out blowing our money on the damn stock exchange.

      Bo: I know what I'm doin'.

      Tim: Bo...

      Bo: I really do!

      Tim: Bo, no offense. These don't sound like companies that are worth anything! Nobody's ever HEARD of them!

      Jeff: And where the fuck do these companies come from?

      Bo: They're companies... from... the Internet.

      Beefy Frat Brother: What the fuck is that?

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल1

    • Why is every actor in the 'straight' fraternity more gay than the 35 y/o actor playing the gay freshman pledge?

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 11 अगस्त 2002 (यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
    • आधिकारिक साइट
      • Official Site
    • भाषा
      • अंग्रेज़ी
    • फ़िल्माने की जगहें
      • Kayak Park, Big Bear Lake, CA, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(Where Christian, Kim, Joe, and Michael have a picnic on the lake beach)
    • उत्पादन कंपनी
      • Triangle Pillar Group
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    बॉक्स ऑफ़िस

    बदलाव करें
    • बजट
      • $75,000(अनुमानित)
    IMDbPro पर बॉक्स ऑफ़िस की विस्तार में जानकारी देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      • 1 घं 30 मि(90 min)
    • रंग
      • Color
    • ध्वनि मिश्रण
      • Stereo
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 1.78 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.