एक शिकारी को काउंट ड्रैकुला को रोकने के लिए ट्रांसिल्वेनिया भेजा जाता है, जो डॉक्टर फ़्रेंकस्टीन के शोध और एक वेर वुल्फ़ का उपयोग कर अपना भयानक उद्देश्य हासिल करना चाहता है.एक शिकारी को काउंट ड्रैकुला को रोकने के लिए ट्रांसिल्वेनिया भेजा जाता है, जो डॉक्टर फ़्रेंकस्टीन के शोध और एक वेर वुल्फ़ का उपयोग कर अपना भयानक उद्देश्य हासिल करना चाहता है.एक शिकारी को काउंट ड्रैकुला को रोकने के लिए ट्रांसिल्वेनिया भेजा जाता है, जो डॉक्टर फ़्रेंकस्टीन के शोध और एक वेर वुल्फ़ का उपयोग कर अपना भयानक उद्देश्य हासिल करना चाहता है.
- पुरस्कार
- 3 जीत और कुल 21 नामांकन
- Dr. Jekyll
- (as Stephen H. Fisher)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Plot: Helsing and his assistant, a frair named Carl, are sent to Translvaynia to protect the last of a gypsy family from being stuck in purgatory due to a curse Dracula put on them. In the process however Helsing must also stop Drac's plan of engulfing the world in darkness all the while battling his minions. Throw in a plot device involving Frankenstein's monster and you have a pretty cool adventure brewing.
I'll admit for a movie that suppose to be about Helsing. They kinda dropped the ball on the story. There's way too much emphasis on the gypsy girl rather him and they don't flesh out his back story about his lost memory and his supposed history with Dracula. Also the movie has a few nonsense parts (the talk with the creepy undertaker) which kinda slows down the film a bit. But still the movie stays on a linear path and the set-ups up to confrontations are well done. Not to mention the confrontation themselves even if some are a little silly (ballroom scene (though a good homage to the Fearless Vampire Killers), the fight with the last bride, Igor and Dracula himself). Yes their CGI laden but I don't care, its a supernatural movie after all. So what better way to do them.
The actors seem very comfortable with their roles and looks to be having a great time. Extra props go out to the dude who played Frankenstien's monster, I was really feeling for him. Easily one of the best characters in the movie.
Add to that some excellent backdrops and clothes to which the film really draws you into its 19th century world. Yes the movie is full of flaws but it only for fun and only wants to entertain to which it success in spades. If you don't like it, well fine. But for all who love a good popcorn flick or a fan of old school monsters, you can look no further. Van Helsing is just the ticket for a simple good time.
The way the brides transform from creepy bat monsters to beautiful women is really cool.
And Richard Roxburgh is really cool as Dracula. I almost didn't recognize him as the duke from Moulin Rouge!
The only part I didn't really like was Frankenstein's monster. He looked cool, I just didn't like his character. But other than that it's no big deal.
Also, Hugh Jackman and Will Kemp are extremely hot in this movie!
For all you fans of The Mummy and The Mummy Returns, you're gonna love this one!
The manifesto is clear almost from the start - find a wafer-thin premise with which to allot your ghouls enough screen time and then just let them loose in a suitably gothic arena. As such, Jackman's Van Helsing often finds himself relegated to the role of a bystander, so perhaps the fact that the film bears his name is a bit of a misnomer; however, like I said, we're pretty much in contrivance territory as far as 'plot development' goes, so it should be seen as just another brand name to hang a silly hat on. In this regard it may pain Jackman the most, since it leaves him still searching for a leading man role in the style of Crowe's "Gladiator" to really leave his print indelibly ("X-Men" is an ensemble piece.) His best moment actually comes before the main brawls begin - testing out various items of weaponary Inspector Gadget stylee!
The lack of focus on the main character shouldn't perturb the audience too much though; if they prepare themselves for a monster royal rumble in the grandest tradition then they should find themselves leaving well satisfied.
I admit that the film runs a little to long, the chemistry between Beckinsale and Jackman leaves something to be desired, and the Frankenstein "monster" (though well-intentioned to give a nod to "Young Frankenstein") is really annoying. But the entertainment spawning from the hokey fun that "Van Helsing" is all about, makes these flaws so forgivable.
For me, I'll take the over-acting screaming Brides of Dracula, the silly homages to dozens of classic action and horror movies, the cheesy one-liners, and the not-so-convincing special effects. Isn't that what monster movies are all about?
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाStephen Sommers deliberately chose to avoid the style of transformations from other werewolf films, where the character would usually grow hair as part of the change. Instead the decision was made to have the character rip his skin off to reveal the werewolf form underneath, going with the idea that the beast "comes from within".
- गूफ़In the opening scene in Paris, when Van Helsing picks up the wanted poster,the Eiffel tower is seen in the background only half built, however, when on the roof of the Cathedral, while Hyde is holding Van Helsing up, the tower can be seen fully built behind them.
- भाव
Aleera: Anna, my love. It is your blood that shall keep me beautiful. What do you think of that?
[laughs triumphantly, then screams as Anna catches a silver stake and impales her through the chest]
Anna Valerious: I think if you're going to kill somebody, kill them! Don't stand around talking about it!
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThe Universal logo turns black and white, then catches on fire, fading into a torch carried by an angry villager.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Van Helsing: The Man and the Monsters (2004)
टॉप पसंद
- How long is Van Helsing?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
- What's a Dwerge supposed to be? I've looked around but haven't been able to find an answer. I know they're loyal to Dracula but that's it.
- Why didn't Van Helsing kill Frankenstein's Monster?
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Kallarai Manithan
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $16,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $12,01,77,084
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $5,17,48,040
- 9 मई 2004
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $30,01,57,638
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 11 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1