The Crooked E: The Unshredded Truth About Enron
- टीवी फ़िल्म
- 2003
- 1 घं 40 मि
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंThe rise and fall of the Enron company, as seen from the perspective of employee Brian Cruver, based on his book.The rise and fall of the Enron company, as seen from the perspective of employee Brian Cruver, based on his book.The rise and fall of the Enron company, as seen from the perspective of employee Brian Cruver, based on his book.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- Liz Perry
- (as Nancy Sakovich)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Christian Kane has the momentous job of playing Cruver, as he appears in every scene except for a prologue which shows him as a child with "Mr. Blue," Brian Dennehey. He also does the narration and has a brief song while driving his new Lexus. And he does it all with dash and aplomb. If this very handsome, talented young actor, whom the camera loves, is not a superstar in the next couple of years, there is something radically wrong. Tony winner Dennehey is outstanding as an employee with a sad story to tell, and Mike Farrell presents Ken Lay as either an eternal optimist or a bald-faced liar or some of both.
I hope this will eventually come out on video or DVD as it's a keeper.
I knew someone who worked at Enron. She started out as a secretary but was very happy to have worked her way into the banking and investment side of the company. That was about a year before the company collapsed and I'd lost touch with her, but I've often wondered how she ended up. If she landed on her feet. I never knew her well, don't have her contact info.
There are probably a thousand stories about individual employees at Enron and how this changed things for them. It's hard to feel sorry for the individuals, when the investors were the real victims, but employees have stories too.
This made for TV movie, which I saw when it came out, was barely adequate. I made it through, but I didn't find it impressive. The Smartest Men in the Room is a far better and much more complete story about Enron.
With Kenneth Lay dead mere months after being found guilty, the Natwest Three becoming a major political football in UK/US relations and one of the bankers found dead six days after going missing, my interest in the subject was peaked enough to look back on this film from a few years ago. The downside of my timing was that I had already seen the imperfect but vastly superior Smartest Guy in the Room. As a documentary, this other film focuses on developing the main story and presenting it as clearly as possible. It also benefits hugely from having access to the in-house video footage that this film can only dramatise. Conversely this film takes a dramatisation path that means by default it has to focus on the made-up character of Cruver and his story as much as on the story of Enron. To some viewers this will work but I suggest that these people have not seen Smartest Guys.
This film does a so-so job of explaining the story but it is happy to do it in massive jumps and simplifications that don't give you the time to let them sink in more than you need to keep Cruver's story moving forward. It delivers the impact of the story pretty basically as well having women crying about their lost money etc. The focus on Cruver doesn't really work because you can't shake the feeling (the knowledge) that his story is infinitely less interesting than the wider story of the corporation and its impact on business. It is made weaker by the TVM style delivery which works "best" overdoing the soapy emotion of the tale but cannot cope with the complex case and the wider ramifications. The direction is so-so and the budget limited although in fairness Smartest Guys used the real offices and real footage, so this can't compare.
The cast are roundly weak, which isn't that much of a surprise. Kane is bland and never convinces no matter what his character is going through. Sure his material isn't that good but his performance is no better. Elizabeth is a "big name" in this film and to the vast majority of us alarm bells will be ringing she has little to do either way. Dennehy turns in with a poor character that is used to explain things in the place of a decent script and his lack of interest is writ large across his performance. The rest of the cast are so-so at best but few convince and Farrell and Wynne are particularly weak.
Overall this is an entry-level film if you are looking to learn more about power, corporations much better is Smartest Guys. In the absence of that film this might be worth a look but it is hard to get a lot of value from this very soapy approach. Works as daytime fodder but the truth deserves much, much more than this.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe real Brian Cruver, whose book inspired the movie, said the movie was very accurate to his experiences working at Enron, with two exceptions: he felt the movie overemphasized the hiring of former strippers as secretaries and assistants, and that the Enron company party showed in the film was very tame compared to the actual company's rallies.
- भाव
Brian Cruver: [Narrating the epilogue] Others at Enron responded more... openly to the call for disclosure. Dream became reality when Playboy presented "The Women of Enron," and then, Playgirl responded with "The Men of Enron." Bickers? Well, he left Wall Street and found something a little more...
[Pictures are shown of Bickers as a blackjack dealer in Las Vegas]
Brian Cruver: secure. Duffy returned his family to San Francisco. Liz found another marketing job.
[Pictures of Liz having her Enron "E" tattoo removed from her breast]
Brian Cruver: And she managed to put the E behind her. Anne-Marie's expecting to start college full-time.
[Pictures of Anne-Marie working as a waitress]
Brian Cruver: . In a year or two. Out of all of our team, McLainey lost the most, but we have no doubt he will land on his feet. Even Lazarri survived. Sort of.
Lazarri: [Cuts to Lazarri at his new job] But, you know what? I know I'm gonna love it here at WorldCom!
टॉप पसंद
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 40 मि(100 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.33 : 1