The Principles of Lust
- 2003
- 1 घं 48 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
4.9/10
1.4 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपने लेखक के ब्लॉक से अपंग, पॉल जोखिम लेने वाले बिली और सुपर-सेक्सी जूलियट के साथ एक नए, रोमांचक रिश्ते में प्रवेश करता है. चूंकि यह तेजी से पेचीदा हो जाता है, तथापि, उसे उनमें से एक को दूसर... सभी पढ़ेंअपने लेखक के ब्लॉक से अपंग, पॉल जोखिम लेने वाले बिली और सुपर-सेक्सी जूलियट के साथ एक नए, रोमांचक रिश्ते में प्रवेश करता है. चूंकि यह तेजी से पेचीदा हो जाता है, तथापि, उसे उनमें से एक को दूसरे के ऊपर चुनना होगा.अपने लेखक के ब्लॉक से अपंग, पॉल जोखिम लेने वाले बिली और सुपर-सेक्सी जूलियट के साथ एक नए, रोमांचक रिश्ते में प्रवेश करता है. चूंकि यह तेजी से पेचीदा हो जाता है, तथापि, उसे उनमें से एक को दूसरे के ऊपर चुनना होगा.
- पुरस्कार
- 2 कुल नामांकन
Gwyn Hollis
- Jude
- (as Gwyne Hollis)
Colin Nutton
- Ray
- (as Skint Eastwood)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
This is one of the worst films I've ever scene. And if this is the kind of film Britain is making then let the industry die.
I was stunned at how bad this film is.
The acting except for Marc Warren and Sienna Guillory is awful. Alec Newman stares madly into space a lot of the time. The supporting cast are so wooden that they can't possibly be professional actors.
Guillory and Newman aren't helped by the fact their characters are selfish, boring and unlikeable.
Marc Warren alone has an interesting character and his performance is all that makes it watchable. The film does at least pick up some energy when he is screen. When he's not the rest of the cast mope around in boredom.
The script is dull. Characters sit in the bath or smoke joints while talking about living life to the full.
The orgy scene is laughable with one character spouting pretentious rubbish about exploring the darker side while wearing a dog collar.
I stuck with this, like I was watching a car crash to see how bad it would get. And when it thankfully finished I was left with a feeling of "So What?".
Its a film that desperately wants to shock with it scenes of explicit sex and violence against children but to be honest is tedious and reminds me of the kind of thing Sixth formers would make to upset their parents.
The fact this film was backed when so many others are struggling to find finance is another nail in the coffin of the British film Industry.
Avoid.
I was stunned at how bad this film is.
The acting except for Marc Warren and Sienna Guillory is awful. Alec Newman stares madly into space a lot of the time. The supporting cast are so wooden that they can't possibly be professional actors.
Guillory and Newman aren't helped by the fact their characters are selfish, boring and unlikeable.
Marc Warren alone has an interesting character and his performance is all that makes it watchable. The film does at least pick up some energy when he is screen. When he's not the rest of the cast mope around in boredom.
The script is dull. Characters sit in the bath or smoke joints while talking about living life to the full.
The orgy scene is laughable with one character spouting pretentious rubbish about exploring the darker side while wearing a dog collar.
I stuck with this, like I was watching a car crash to see how bad it would get. And when it thankfully finished I was left with a feeling of "So What?".
Its a film that desperately wants to shock with it scenes of explicit sex and violence against children but to be honest is tedious and reminds me of the kind of thing Sixth formers would make to upset their parents.
The fact this film was backed when so many others are struggling to find finance is another nail in the coffin of the British film Industry.
Avoid.
At last, a British movie with a degree of ambition, even if the ambition remains unfulfilled by the film's fade-out. Basically, this is the old tale of the blocked male protagonist becoming enervated by an encounter with his dark side before ultimately realising the error of his ways (see also FIGHT CLUB). As a meditation on machismo and the male psyche, this certainly passes muster, with the dark side manifestation Billy (a truly scary and, hopefully, career-defining performance by Marc Warren) proving that the devil really does have all the best tunes (literally, as the soundtrack really rocks when the characters get down to their darker doings). However, the invention and insight runs out around the halfway mark leaving us with some sub-Georges Bataille musings and a conventional wrap-up which seriously detract from an interesting set-up which promises much but delivers merely a light cuff when a sucker punch is needed. Still, it's dark, challenging and occasionally disturbing work (the corruption of innocence theme is particularly well handled, as is the direction of all the child actors), and the explicit sexual detail will almost certainly result in a truncated or unrated version being released Stateside. On the basis of this, director Penny Woolcock and saturnine star Marc Warren look to be emergent talents well worth watching. Recommended, albeit with reservations.
I found the philosophy of what this film was after very persuasive. Looking at the schism that forms in any artist serious about their work, and the agony of the personal choices that come out of sacrificing for one's work. The film looks at how artists make this choice. The characters are well defined and the acting is compelling. I felt the tension of the central character's choices palpably. The motivations behind the actions of each character were well exposed and added depth to what, in less able hands, would have resulted in inexplicable behavior. This central theme of choice, the choice of what type of life we pursue and the conflicts that emerge between desire for adventure and comfort are beautifully drawn in this film.
Saw this tonight and felt obliged to look up this film online, its apolitical kitchen sink drama for the naughties - or noughties, or whatever - but its more than kitchen sink, its Shakespearian with its symbolism. Poor Britain, it has descended into lad-ism and porn, gone mad between temptation and boredom, the sickness of newsfeed represented by shocking violence, irresponsibility and real games. I'm seriously impressed with the writer who got all this into the script, I "got it" Its not for the faint hearted, a lot of things aren't, but if you're a player, or want to be - well you might be surprised what actually goes on. I hope to see more from this director.
I watched this film primarily as a fan of Sienna Guillory. To be honest, she was the only thing worth hanging around for, the film became so boring at stages I felt myself drifting off to sleep. It feels incredibly long, especially once you reach the end of the movie and realise not a whole lot has actually happened. It doesn't feel original (the same ideas have been dealt with in countless better films), the acting was hardly top notch, and the characters were thoroughly unlikeable and unoriginal. Unless you're really into these types of films, or you have a *really* strong fascination with one of the actors involved, I wouldn't recommend it. You're not missing much.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAn uncredited actress performs unsimulated sex during an orgy scene. "Yeah, well, y'know. You saw it. It was always in the script that we turned up to a swingers club. I can't really remember a lot about it, but we mixed with a lot of people who really were from the club and just shot it. Certain things you can't fake, can you?" - Marc Warren explained.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is The Principles of Lust?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Şehvetin Esasları
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 48 मि(108 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.78 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें