जब बदनाम हुए एक पूर्व कॉलेज डीन का एक रहस्यमयी युवा महिला के साथ प्रेम प्रसंग होता है, तो अपने विकृत गहरे अतीत, से डरकर, उन्हें अपने जीवन के चौंकाने वाले तथ्य के रूप में सामना करने का दवाब ड... सभी पढ़ेंजब बदनाम हुए एक पूर्व कॉलेज डीन का एक रहस्यमयी युवा महिला के साथ प्रेम प्रसंग होता है, तो अपने विकृत गहरे अतीत, से डरकर, उन्हें अपने जीवन के चौंकाने वाले तथ्य के रूप में सामना करने का दवाब डाला जाता है जिसे उन्होनें पचास वर्षों से गुप्त रखा है.जब बदनाम हुए एक पूर्व कॉलेज डीन का एक रहस्यमयी युवा महिला के साथ प्रेम प्रसंग होता है, तो अपने विकृत गहरे अतीत, से डरकर, उन्हें अपने जीवन के चौंकाने वाले तथ्य के रूप में सामना करने का दवाब डाला जाता है जिसे उन्होनें पचास वर्षों से गुप्त रखा है.
- पुरस्कार
- 3 जीत और कुल 5 नामांकन
- Walter
- (as Danny Blanco)
- Young Ernestine
- (as Kristen Blevins)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I thought this was a lovely film - Anthony Hopkins is excellent and extremely convincing in this role, as were the characters of Farley (the ex-husband) & Zuckerman. The friendship particularly between Zuckerman and Coleman was extremely warm and charming. However, whilst Nicole Kidman's acting was very good, I remained unconvinced by the character that she played. Aside from this, I found the film extremely engaging and believable.
The plot is intriguing. The pasts of the main protagonists unfold, making their characters exceptionally deep. We get to see these characters evolve in interesting and compelling ways. There are shades-of-grey in these characters. We don't have the perfect hero. We have gentle people with kind hearts who make mistakes.
The direction is perfectly understated. There is a lot of nuance in the way the scenes are filmed and the way in which the actors are framed. Instead of the love scenes being the all-to-familiar humping and groaning, these scenes are filmed without graphic nudity. Note the way in which Anthony Hopkins places his hands on Nicole Kidman's back. It is so loving and tender and intimate.
Even the editing is right on. The length of the film, at 106 minutes, is the perfect length. There are no wasted scenes.
Some of the material is hard to watch. Note the posture and the facial expression on Anthony Hopkins in the kitchen scene in which Nicole Kidman is giving him a hard time. It is subtle and painful to watch.
If you are into light-hearted escapist film, this isn't for you. The subject matter is deep and difficult. I like these kinds of movies and this one is one of the best in class.
Kudos to all involved with this film.
This is a film that just does it right. Unlike so many other dramas with heavyweight casts, this really feels like it's about the story, not the work. Kidman, aside from slipping into her native accent on a handful of words, is fantastic -- perhaps her very best. Harris, like Streep and maybe two or three other actors, brings a real humanity to a role that any other actor would just fill out.
But most of all, everything is in the background and hence subservient to the story. The gorgeous lighting, scenery, dialog -- the whole craft of the film is done the way it's supposed to be done, in the damn background. That all said, I think the real reason this film is slighted is because it's a little too good for the average viewer. It doesn't live up to their idea of what a lit-cum-drama is supposed to feel like. I just have a feeling that in several years this will be revisited and appreciated much more. Now, I'm going to go watch it again!
Anthony Hopkins did a good job of playing a man riddled by angst, but his misery seemed to stem from his being in the movie, rather than from being in character. Gary Senise, an enjoyable actor, was stiff and terrified-looking. Ed Harris was typically brilliant.
The interesting part of the movie is the story of a young black man growing up in the 1940's and "passing" for white. The actors playing his family were wonderful, and the insights offered were moving and human. It is a shame that part of the story was not lifted out and made into a movie of its own. It would have been better for us all.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe mole on the side of Sir Anthony Hopkins' (Coleman Silk's) head was added, due to the fact that Wentworth Miller (Young Coleman Silk) has a mole on the side of his head. Hopkins also wore green contacts to match the color of Miller's eyes.
- गूफ़When Coleman is looking in the dictionary for the definition of the word "Spooks" he turns to nearly the beginning of the book that couldn't possibly be the letter "S"
- भाव
Coleman Silk: Granted, she's not my first love. Granted, she's not my great love. But she is sure as hell my last love. Doesn't that count for something?
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Nicole Kidman: An American Cinematheque Tribute (2003)
- साउंडट्रैकHoneysuckle Rose
Written by Fats Waller (as Thomas "Fats" Waller) and Andy Razaf
Performed by Jess Stacy
Courtesy of Soundies Inc.
By arrangement with De Pugh Music
टॉप पसंद
- How long is The Human Stain?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- La Piel Del Deseo
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $3,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $53,81,908
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $10,34,195
- 2 नव॰ 2003
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $2,29,54,068
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 46 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1