[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंसबसे बढ़िया 250 फ़िल्मेंसर्वाधिक लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशो का समय और टिकटफ़िल्मों से जुड़ी खबरेंइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    टीवी और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैसबसे बढ़िया 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय टीवी शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंटीवी न्यूज़
    देखने के लिए क्या हैनए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका आज जन्म हुआसबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    सहायता केंद्रकंट्रीब्यूटर ज़ोनपॉल
उद्योग पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro

They

  • 2002
  • PG-13
  • 1 घं 29 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
4.8/10
14 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
Laura Regan in They (2002)
A psychology student finds all her childhood fears and phobias becoming real after a traumatic event.
trailer प्ले करें2:20
1 वीडियो
16 फ़ोटो
Supernatural HorrorHorrorMysteryThriller

अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA psychology student and her friends start to have nightmares, resulting in strange marks appearing on their bodies.A psychology student and her friends start to have nightmares, resulting in strange marks appearing on their bodies.A psychology student and her friends start to have nightmares, resulting in strange marks appearing on their bodies.

  • निर्देशक
    • Robert Harmon
  • लेखक
    • Brendan Hood
  • स्टार
    • Laura Regan
    • Marc Blucas
    • Ethan Embry
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    4.8/10
    14 हज़ार
    आपकी रेटिंग
    • निर्देशक
      • Robert Harmon
    • लेखक
      • Brendan Hood
    • स्टार
      • Laura Regan
      • Marc Blucas
      • Ethan Embry
    • 289यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 70आलोचक समीक्षाएं
    • 31मेटास्कोर
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
    • पुरस्कार
      • 1 जीत और कुल 1 नामांकन

    वीडियो1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 2:20
    Official Trailer

    फ़ोटो16

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    + 10
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार25

    बदलाव करें
    Laura Regan
    Laura Regan
    • Julia Lund
    Marc Blucas
    Marc Blucas
    • Paul Loomis
    Ethan Embry
    Ethan Embry
    • Sam Burnside
    Dagmara Dominczyk
    Dagmara Dominczyk
    • Terry Alba
    Jon Abrahams
    Jon Abrahams
    • Billy Parks
    Alexander Gould
    Alexander Gould
    • Young Billy
    Desiree Zurowski
    Desiree Zurowski
    • Mary Parks
    Mark Hildreth
    Mark Hildreth
    • Troy
    Jonathan Cherry
    Jonathan Cherry
    • Darren
    Peter LaCroix
    Peter LaCroix
    • David Parks
    • (as Peter Lacroix)
    Jessica Amlee
    Jessica Amlee
    • Young Julia
    Jay Brazeau
    Jay Brazeau
    • Dr. Booth
    L. Harvey Gold
    L. Harvey Gold
    • Professor Crowley
    David Abbott
    David Abbott
    • Professor Adkins
    Jodelle Ferland
    Jodelle Ferland
    • Sarah
    • (as Jodelle Micah Ferland)
    Mark Brandon
    Mark Brandon
    • Newscaster #1
    Colin Foo
    Colin Foo
    • Chinese Chef
    Claire Riley
    • Newscaster #2
    • निर्देशक
      • Robert Harmon
    • लेखक
      • Brendan Hood
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं289

    4.814.4K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    icelandknight

    Imaginary creatures who live in the dark come to get their victims.

    This film has it's good and bad sides. There's a lot of potential and beautiful scenes in this movie. I don't know how they managed to find that country scene with mists, the moon, a country road and everything just perfect!

    It also succeeds in scaring the viewer quite a few times with startling attacks and creepy camera work. I would even have liked to see more of this, but true, it might become repetitive, and we know how how we hate repetitive stuff in the world of the short attention span! Also sound is used to scare, like the telephone ringing in the 'Exorcist', at a tense moment.

    It also slightly over uses the "monster coming to get the camera" scene, where a scary monster comes at the camera (/viewer). These are good methods of scaring people.

    There are some terrible logic errors and they do spoil the film for 'thinking' people. If it was a real scenario her boyfriend, for example, wouldn't let her out of his sight! Much of the plot relies on the people isolating themselves from others for anything to take place. The strange thing is, even though they know they are in danger, they still go off on their own, where no one is there to help them. Whenever there are people present, nothing happens.

    This flaw ruined the film a bit for me. I kept thinking "why is she doing THAT", when nothing would happen if she did THIS. Very frustrating... but I guess they were out to make a movie about people being attacked when they were alone, and this is what they ended up with. (The British "Lenny Henry Show" did a great parody of this kind of movie, with the actors always saying: "We've got to split up, it's more likely we get chopped up that way!" and "oh-oh, the music's changed, that must mean - here comes the bad guy!")

    Also, without spoiling anything, there are some places where people just seem to willingly ignore the facts. Like when a window is broken -inwards-, into a closed chamber. No one even noticed that, and one is left asking - and then what? Just another missing person from a locked room? How many of these can there be? Where are the paranormal investigators when you need them? Where are the university geeks want to become the "ghost busters"? They investigated stuff like this in "The Entity" and that was supposed to be based on a true story.

    Coming back to the positive side, I can imagine the actress playing the main part was chosen because she bears a striking resemblance to a young Mia Farrow in "Rosemary's Baby". Those types are always believable when scared to death. One seems to identify with a skinny (almost anorexic (was that possibly the comment they were making with her vomiting in the railways station?) sweet young thing. Her boyfriend is far too conservative for his own good. Letting her sleep alone in a double bed! What kind of gentleman is that, in this day and age! Just think: If her impotent shrink had been played by Bruce Willis he'd have followed up on her story and we'd have seen some aliens splattered all over the subway! - Now that'd been juicy! Sorry wrong film. That's "Mimic".

    "They" is one of these movies that end up being rather annoying the more you see it. From all sides... and I agree there was a LOT of potential in there. Just not quite enough attention to detail.

    Still: *** /5
    3SnoopyStyle

    "Wes Craven presents" means Wes got paid

    Nineteen years ago, young Billy Parks was taken by a mysterious force in his bedroom. In the present, Julia Lund (Laura Regan) is working towards her masters degree in psychology. Paul Loomis (Marc Blucas) is her boyfriend. She meets childhood friend Billy who claims that they were marked as children and warns her about the dark. He then shoots himself in front of her.

    This thing is devastatingly slow. There is no tension whatsoever. The story is stripped down to basically nothing. It doesn't maintain any creepiness. As a horror, there is nothing to be afraid of in this. The jump scares are really telegraphed. Laura Regan screams but that's all. The "Wes Craven presents" is the first warning. Essentially, it means that Wes collected a paycheck but otherwise has little to do with the filmmaking.
    Svperstar

    Why do people hate this movie so much?

    I rented this movie last night with a friend of mine because I had heard it was sooooooo awful on this website and wanted a bad movie to laugh at.

    I was suprised to find out it is actually a decent horror movie. People who say this is one of the worst movies ever must have only seen 5 movies in their whole lives and they all must have been in the top ten here at the imdb.

    I do have a couple of problems with it.

    1)The CGI monsters are very fake looking in a few scenes, this really detracts from suspense.

    2)They show too much of the monsters too early on in the movie. They should have watched The Others where suspense was created by not showing The Others till the very end.

    Other then that I thought this was a decent horror movie, what else do people expect out of a horror flick then this? It was kinda creepy and interesting to watch the people die, the plot was decent involving the whole psychology aspect. People who think this is one of the worst movies ever need to watch Fear Dot Com or any of the Freddy/Jason movies after number 3 or so.

    7 / 10
    badgirlkane

    Even though a lot of people hate this film I very much enjoyed it

    They isn't a horror film for fans of horror who like gratitious gore and is more of a plot-thought provoking film where if you ever did suffer from the mental disorder known as Night Terrors as i did as a young child then this movie will strike a chord within you and leave chills running up and down your spine. If you never had horrific nightmares as a kid then it probably won't do much for you as the acting really isn't that great and I really didn't feel that sympathetic towards any of the adult charachters once They got them. They afterwards spooked the living crap out of me as for several weeks now I've had to close my closet door before i go to sleep as I have visions of the very well executed They monsters in the back of my mind.Definatley rent the DVD as the alternate ending offers more of an explanation as to what They is but it also takes away from the horror movie aspect of the film and makes it a film in just psychlogical terror instead. *** out of *****
    Li-1

    A surprisingly solid genre picture that delivers first-rate atmosphere and scares.

    Rating: *** out of ****

    In this era of modern horror, it's really the little films that come through and surprise me the most, so I'm glad to include They among this recent bunch (which also includes the terrifically frightening Dead End and the surprisingly funny Monster Man). I must admit to having relatively low expectations; the film was promoted with the heading "Wes Craven presents" and the film's director, Robert Harmon, hasn't done anything worth mentioning in years.

    But the movie works, and if it's not particularly original or outstanding, it's at least very well made and makes smart decisions (i.e. a more atmospheric, quietly creepy approach) that lesser films would have avoided. In fact, the movie is so low-key I'm surprised it wasn't just given a straight-to-video release, as nothing in this picture screams box office success the way a noisy, thrill ride approach that Darkness Falls employed might.

    They stars the very cute Laura Regan (sporting an adorable haircut!) as Julia Lund, a psychology grad student who's contacted by an old friend of hers. They reunite in a coffee shop, with the friend mentioning some half-comprehensible blather about "they," then kills himself right before her eyes. At his funeral, Julia meets a couple of his more recent friends (played by Ethan Embry and Dagmara Dominczyk), and upon a few conversations, discover they all have something in common. They've experienced night terrors as kids and believe something in the dark that once branded them as children is now back to collect.

    Even running at a scant ninety minutes, it could be debated They still runs too long. The subplot with Embry and Dominczyk doesn't really go anywhere and only provides the opportunity for two lengthy sequences where we know these two are going to meet a particularly horrifying fate. Had these two scenes been less effective, I might have complained, but these setpieces are directed with the right amount of build-up, tension, and atmosphere, making the pay-off worth it. And at least those two aren't as fundamentally useless as Marc Blucas, who plays Julia's disbelieving boyfriend. It's a cliché role and nothing about him stands out in the slightest (see The Grudge for a very similar role).

    As the lead, Laura Regan proves a very competent performer who's sympathetic and likable. The little discoveries she makes are creepy and intriguingly enthralling. There's hints of an alternate "universe" these creatures live in and the brief views we get of this world are among the film's most visually engrossing moments.

    The monsters themselves are mostly kept out of plain sight, kept hidden in shadows and darkness so that what little we can see only enhances the scares. The sounds they make also build a nice sense of unease, a trilling noise that gives the creatures an otherwordly feel to them, not unlike the mysterious creatures in Signs.

    The film is mostly a collection of effectively frightening setpieces. Most of the concepts the movie introduces are left both satisfyingly and frustratingly unresolved; there's just enough to fascinate, but maybe just a few more answers or theories would have been appreciated. They comes to an abrupt end, but that works in favor of the movie, finishing things off on a startlingly high note.

    इस तरह के और

    Darkness Falls
    5.0
    Darkness Falls
    Pulse
    4.7
    Pulse
    The Monster
    5.4
    The Monster
    China Lake
    7.1
    China Lake
    सलेम का लोटा
    5.6
    सलेम का लोटा
    Soul Survivors
    3.9
    Soul Survivors
    House on Haunted Hill
    5.6
    House on Haunted Hill
    Abandoned
    3.8
    Abandoned
    The Quiet Ones
    5.1
    The Quiet Ones
    House of the Dead
    2.1
    House of the Dead
    Whisper
    5.7
    Whisper
    Oracle
    4.8
    Oracle

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      Contrary to the marketing's claims, Wes Craven had no involvement in the production of the film. The complete U.S. title for They is "Wes Craven Presents: They." Craven was considered an 'executive producer' of the movie. However, other than lending his name to the title, he had no part in the making of They (2002). It's assumed that the purpose for putting his name in the title was to publicize the movie and attract horror fans.
    • गूफ़
      In the opening stormy weather scene lightening and thunder crash and the power goes out. Young Billy's flashlight quits working as the scene shifts back to young Billy's window there is a night-light lamp that is still illuminated.
    • भाव

      Terry: What do you think went through Billy's mind when he did it?

      Sam: The bullet.

    • इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जन
      A work print shown to test audiences features an open credits sequence of young Julia sleeping.
    • कनेक्शन
      Featured in WatchMojo: Another Top 10 Worst Movie Endings (2015)
    • साउंडट्रैक
      Center of the World
      Written by Ryan McAllister

      Performed by Dakona

      Courtesy of Wayne Ledbetter for Eric Godtland Management, Inc.

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल30

    • How long is They?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
    • What is 'They' about?
    • Is 'They' based on a book?
    • Why do They only target children who have night terrors?

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 27 नवंबर 2002 (यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
      • कनाडा
    • भाषा
      • अंग्रेज़ी
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • Habitantes de la obscuridad
    • फ़िल्माने की जगहें
      • Burnaby, ब्रिटिश कोलंबिया,कनाडा
    • उत्पादन कंपनियां
      • Dimension Films
      • Focus Features
      • Radar Pictures
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    बॉक्स ऑफ़िस

    बदलाव करें
    • बजट
      • $1,70,00,000(अनुमानित)
    • US और कनाडा में सकल
      • $1,28,40,842
    • US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
      • $51,44,090
      • 1 दिस॰ 2002
    • दुनिया भर में सकल
      • $1,64,46,271
    IMDbPro पर बॉक्स ऑफ़िस की विस्तार में जानकारी देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      1 घंटा 29 मिनट
    • रंग
      • Color
    • ध्वनि मिश्रण
      • DTS
      • Dolby Digital
      • SDDS
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 2.35 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    Laura Regan in They (2002)
    टॉप गैप
    By what name was They (2002) officially released in India in English?
    जवाब
    • और अंतराल देखें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.