IMDb रेटिंग
5.8/10
23 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
विश्व युद्ध II के दौरान लंदन में, यह वेंडी की बेटी, जेन की कहानी है, जिसे कैप्टन हुक द्वारा अपहरण कर लिया गया है और पीटर पैन बचाने को आता है.विश्व युद्ध II के दौरान लंदन में, यह वेंडी की बेटी, जेन की कहानी है, जिसे कैप्टन हुक द्वारा अपहरण कर लिया गया है और पीटर पैन बचाने को आता है.विश्व युद्ध II के दौरान लंदन में, यह वेंडी की बेटी, जेन की कहानी है, जिसे कैप्टन हुक द्वारा अपहरण कर लिया गया है और पीटर पैन बचाने को आता है.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 4 कुल नामांकन
Blayne Weaver
- Peter Pan
- (वॉइस)
Harriet Owen
- Jane
- (वॉइस)
- …
Corey Burton
- Captain Hook
- (वॉइस)
Jeff Bennett
- Smee
- (वॉइस)
- …
Kath Soucie
- Wendy Darling
- (वॉइस)
Andrew McDonough
- Danny
- (वॉइस)
Roger Rees
- Edward
- (वॉइस)
Spencer Breslin
- Cubby
- (वॉइस)
Bradley Pierce
- Nibs
- (वॉइस)
Quinn Beswick
- Slightly
- (वॉइस)
Aaron Spann
- Twins
- (वॉइस)
Dan Castellaneta
- Pirates
- (वॉइस)
Jim Cummings
- Turk
- (वॉइस)
Rob Paulsen
- Jukes
- (वॉइस)
Clive Revill
- Elderly Officer
- (वॉइस)
- …
Frank Welker
- Nana II
- (वॉइस)
- …
Wally Wingert
- Chorus
- (वॉइस)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
"Peter Pan In Return To Never Land" is Disneys animated sequel to their truly classic 1953 adaptation of J.M. Barries beloved childrens story. Times moved on since the first movie and although Peter Pan never grew up, Wendy did. Its now World War Two and an adult Wendy is living in London, still telling tales of Peter Pan, Captain Hook, Tinkerbell and all the other inhabitants of Never Land to her two children; Danny, an awe struck little boy and Jane, a more cynical, pragmatic older girl who has no time for fairytales. However when Hook flies his sailing ship to London, kidnaps Jane and takes her to Never Land, she soon wishes she has paid more attention to her mothers stories.
With a budget of a mere $20M the film was produced by Disneys TV animation department (who have previously toiled over straight to video/DVD sequels for other Disney movies including "Cinderella," "The Lady And The Tramp," "The Lion King" and "The Little Mermaid"), but this was apparently always planned as a cinematic release. The film succeeds in combining the traditional feel of the original 50s animation with a more contemporary look, particularly for the intrepid young heroine Jane (whose modern looking bobbed haircut was actually highly fashionable during World War Two!). The use of computer generated animation does successfully enhance certain scenes, sometimes so subtly you dont even notice, and sometimes in the case of Tinkerbells magical pixie dust to spectacular effect. However Hooks computer generated ship, while certainly impressive, unfortunately stands out uncomfortably from the traditionally animated environments that surround it. Overall though "Peter Pan In Return To Never Land" only the second sequel to a Disney feature to be released on the big screen more than deserves a cinematic outing, and will no doubt go down well with the latest generation of Disney fans, who have grown up with a VHS copy of the original at home.
With a budget of a mere $20M the film was produced by Disneys TV animation department (who have previously toiled over straight to video/DVD sequels for other Disney movies including "Cinderella," "The Lady And The Tramp," "The Lion King" and "The Little Mermaid"), but this was apparently always planned as a cinematic release. The film succeeds in combining the traditional feel of the original 50s animation with a more contemporary look, particularly for the intrepid young heroine Jane (whose modern looking bobbed haircut was actually highly fashionable during World War Two!). The use of computer generated animation does successfully enhance certain scenes, sometimes so subtly you dont even notice, and sometimes in the case of Tinkerbells magical pixie dust to spectacular effect. However Hooks computer generated ship, while certainly impressive, unfortunately stands out uncomfortably from the traditionally animated environments that surround it. Overall though "Peter Pan In Return To Never Land" only the second sequel to a Disney feature to be released on the big screen more than deserves a cinematic outing, and will no doubt go down well with the latest generation of Disney fans, who have grown up with a VHS copy of the original at home.
Young Jane has lost her faith in imagination and Peter Pan with the outbreak of the Second World War II. With her father off at war and her mother distracted by childish stories, Jane feels she is the most mature, and is looking after her family as she promised she would. But after a falling out with Wendy, Jane finds herself on board Captain Hook's ship, heading towards the second star to the right. It's not until Jane let's go of trying to be a grown up does she truly find happiness and magic. The music throughout is very well written and while modernized does still replicate the feel of the original. Ultimately, I feel this was a great carry-on from the original with all the splendor of Neverland and the perils of the island shared between Peter and Hook!
After so many years it was not a surprise that the original charm and concept would not be captured the same way in its sequel. The animation was incredibly expressive and smooth, close to being top-notch in traditional animation at the time given it was animated by Walt Disney TV Animation.
The plot kept some beats that resonate with what Peter Pan and Neverland are all about: growing up. Themes like maturing, friendship, faith and imagination are explored again in this film only with new characters and a new backdrop (London Blitz period in WWII). But it's undeniable the frequent talking down to the more younger audiences instead of allowing them to learn the lessons by themselves.
Surprisingly, the plot had direction and a final goal with other subplots emerging from it that made sense most of the time. Nevertheless, these were not as engaging enough to keep the audience wondering if the protagonists were in danger at all.
IN CONCLUSION, the movie doesn't do many things wrong but rather stick to what it does well, it has varied and quirky characters, an endearing sequel effect with Wendy all grown up, fun and heartwarming messages for the younger audiences and original ideas like having a new enemy for Captain Hook or the background of the story with the father. But that's just it, the movie is just another adventure with similar beats from the first Peter Pan, it doesn't try to tell a new story just "reinvent the wheel". Also fans of the original work Disney's movie is based on might get angered by how little it reminisces the original spirit of the stories. Although by now it should be obvious that Disney's creations are but loosely-based adaptations of such tales so it shouldn't be judged harshly.
The plot kept some beats that resonate with what Peter Pan and Neverland are all about: growing up. Themes like maturing, friendship, faith and imagination are explored again in this film only with new characters and a new backdrop (London Blitz period in WWII). But it's undeniable the frequent talking down to the more younger audiences instead of allowing them to learn the lessons by themselves.
Surprisingly, the plot had direction and a final goal with other subplots emerging from it that made sense most of the time. Nevertheless, these were not as engaging enough to keep the audience wondering if the protagonists were in danger at all.
IN CONCLUSION, the movie doesn't do many things wrong but rather stick to what it does well, it has varied and quirky characters, an endearing sequel effect with Wendy all grown up, fun and heartwarming messages for the younger audiences and original ideas like having a new enemy for Captain Hook or the background of the story with the father. But that's just it, the movie is just another adventure with similar beats from the first Peter Pan, it doesn't try to tell a new story just "reinvent the wheel". Also fans of the original work Disney's movie is based on might get angered by how little it reminisces the original spirit of the stories. Although by now it should be obvious that Disney's creations are but loosely-based adaptations of such tales so it shouldn't be judged harshly.
All you need is faith, trust and pixie dust! This is a surprisingly pleasant sequel. The C.G. Tinkerbelle is not as ...delicate as I remember from the first, but she is still made well and is just as spunky! I think they did a very good job on this movie...so good of a job that I would not classify it with normal sequels. I think it will be on the shelf with the other classics. They still have the Tink that turns red when she's mad, and the lost boys haven't changed a bit. Peter is just as I remember him, and in all this they did a great job. And overall, I love this movie. The credits did surprise me. They reminded me of the last page in the Little Golden Books I read as a child. Very similar artistry...very similar lay out.
Also, I'd like to add that the music was actually not torture for me to listen to...which counts for a lot for my opinion of cartoons.
I would not miss taking my children to this movie. It's even a sweet date movie.
I think you will like it.
Also, I'd like to add that the music was actually not torture for me to listen to...which counts for a lot for my opinion of cartoons.
I would not miss taking my children to this movie. It's even a sweet date movie.
I think you will like it.
I found this movie quite enchanting. It captured the spirit of the original quite well, and a reference to the original story that wasn't in the first Disney that was thrown in had me clapping until my hands were sore... But it wasn't applause. (I'll say no more, I don't wish to spoil the movie for anyone else.) And Jane was a great contrast to Wendy. I would totally recommend this movie to anyone who loved the first.
Faith, Trust, and Pixie Dust!!!
Faith, Trust, and Pixie Dust!!!
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाKathryn Beaumont was originally suggested to play adult Wendy, since she played young Wendy in the original Peter Pan (1953).
- गूफ़Wendy's husband leaves to fight in WWII as the Battle of Britain is beginning. This occurred in 1940, prior to US active participation in the war, but the military truck he leaves home in has the "circled star" roundel of the United States Army rather than the "bullseye" roundel of the UK or the "crowned lion" logo of the British Army. While he has a British army type cap but American sheepskin type jacket and trousers tucked into American long boots.
- भाव
[the Jolly Roger is sinking with Captain Hook still on board]
Captain Hook: Help me! Help me!
Peter Pan: You know the rules, Hook. A good captain always goes down with his ship.
Captain Hook: I don't want to be a good captain!
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटThis film would not have been possible without the inspiration from the original motion picture and the work of its talented artists and animators.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनOn most dubs, "I'll Try" is the first song being played in the credits. "Do You Believe in Magic?" plays after.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Troldspejlet: एपिसोड #26.10 (2002)
- साउंडट्रैकDo You Believe in Magic?
Music and Lyrics by John Sebastian
Performed by BBMak
Produced by Stephen Lipson
BBMak appear courtesy of Hollywood Records/Telstar Records Ltd.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Return to Never Land?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- आधिकारिक साइट
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Pīṭṭar pāṉ 2: Riṭṭarṉ ṭū nevar lēṇṭ
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $2,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $4,84,30,258
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $1,18,89,631
- 17 फ़र॰ 2002
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $11,51,21,981
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 12 मिनट
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.66 : 1
- 1.85 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें