[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro

Signs

  • 2002
  • UA
  • 1 घं 46 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
6.8/10
4 लाख
आपकी रेटिंग
लोकप्रियता
1,131
287
Signs (2002)
CT #2, post
trailer प्ले करें1:35
4 वीडियो
99+ फ़ोटो
Sci-Fiड्रामाथ्रिलररहस्यविदेशी आक्रमण

फ़ादर ग्रेहम और उनका परिवार एक फार्म हाउस में रहने जाते हैं, तब उन्हें अपने खेतों में अजीब फ़सल चक्र बने हुए दिखते हैं, जो एलियन के होने का इशारा करते हैं.फ़ादर ग्रेहम और उनका परिवार एक फार्म हाउस में रहने जाते हैं, तब उन्हें अपने खेतों में अजीब फ़सल चक्र बने हुए दिखते हैं, जो एलियन के होने का इशारा करते हैं.फ़ादर ग्रेहम और उनका परिवार एक फार्म हाउस में रहने जाते हैं, तब उन्हें अपने खेतों में अजीब फ़सल चक्र बने हुए दिखते हैं, जो एलियन के होने का इशारा करते हैं.

  • निर्देशक
    • M. Night Shyamalan
  • लेखक
    • M. Night Shyamalan
  • स्टार
    • Mel Gibson
    • Joaquin Phoenix
    • Rory Culkin
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    6.8/10
    4 लाख
    आपकी रेटिंग
    लोकप्रियता
    1,131
    287
    • निर्देशक
      • M. Night Shyamalan
    • लेखक
      • M. Night Shyamalan
    • स्टार
      • Mel Gibson
      • Joaquin Phoenix
      • Rory Culkin
    • 2.5Kयूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 202आलोचक समीक्षाएं
    • 59मेटास्कोर
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
    • पुरस्कार
      • 3 जीत और कुल 34 नामांकन

    वीडियो4

    Signs
    Trailer 1:35
    Signs
    Why M. Night Shyamalan Put on His "Boogie Shoes" for 'Knock at the Cabin'
    Clip 4:02
    Why M. Night Shyamalan Put on His "Boogie Shoes" for 'Knock at the Cabin'
    Why M. Night Shyamalan Put on His "Boogie Shoes" for 'Knock at the Cabin'
    Clip 4:02
    Why M. Night Shyamalan Put on His "Boogie Shoes" for 'Knock at the Cabin'
    'Knock at the Cabin' Cast: Extended Interviews
    Interview 15:42
    'Knock at the Cabin' Cast: Extended Interviews
    What Roles Has Joaquin Phoenix Turned Down?
    Video 3:02
    What Roles Has Joaquin Phoenix Turned Down?

    फ़ोटो109

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    + 103
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार29

    बदलाव करें
    Mel Gibson
    Mel Gibson
    • Graham Hess
    Joaquin Phoenix
    Joaquin Phoenix
    • Merrill Hess
    Rory Culkin
    Rory Culkin
    • Morgan Hess
    Abigail Breslin
    Abigail Breslin
    • Bo Hess
    Cherry Jones
    Cherry Jones
    • Officer Paski
    M. Night Shyamalan
    M. Night Shyamalan
    • Ray Reddy
    Patricia Kalember
    Patricia Kalember
    • Colleen Hess
    Ted Sutton
    Ted Sutton
    • SFC Cunningham
    Merritt Wever
    Merritt Wever
    • Tracey Abernathy
    Lanny Flaherty
    Lanny Flaherty
    • Mr. Nathan
    Marion McCorry
    • Mrs. Nathan
    Michael Showalter
    Michael Showalter
    • Lionel Prichard
    Kevin Pires
    • Brazilian Birthday Boy
    Clifford David
    Clifford David
    • Columbia University Professor
    Rhonda Overby
    • Sarah Hughes
    Greg Wood
    • TV Anchor
    Paul L. Nolan
    • Mexico City Reporter
    • (वॉइस)
    • (as Paul Nolan)
    Ukee Washington
    Ukee Washington
    • Off-Screen TV Anchor
    • (वॉइस)
    • निर्देशक
      • M. Night Shyamalan
    • लेखक
      • M. Night Shyamalan
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं2.5K

    6.8403.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    bctitan04

    Fantastic Movie

    This is definitely one of the best movies that I have seen in years. The dialogue is smart, the camera work is perfect and the information and background setting are divulged to the audience at precisely the right pace and exactly the right moment. Mel Gibson turns in his best performance that I can remember and so does Pheonix, who is extremely funny and plays a very real and well defined character. The movie is coincidently the scariest movie that I can remember seeing in theatres, and the scary moments are guaranteed to haunt you for a few days afterwards at least, but the movie is so much better than that and its so much more than a movie about aliens. As everyone knows from reviews, "Signs" means more than just crop signs, but "signs" are never portrayed in a cheesy way, but in a realistic and honest sense, and capturing such a deep topic without going overboard or making a mockery of it seems very hard these days, so that makes the film all the more impressive. Basically, its just awesome, it really is. Go see it.
    8bkoganbing

    Seeing The Small Picture

    During the course of the film Joaquin Phoenix's character remarks that the situation they're in seems like The War Of The Worlds. It certainly is, but the small picture of it.

    Whereas H.G. Wells wrote on the grand scale about what nations and governments were doing to fight an alien invasion, M. Night Shyamalan's Signs concerns itself with the small picture, what is happening in one tiny corner of the world, to be precise Bucks County, Pennsylvania and very specifically Mel Gibson and his family.

    One day farmer Gibson who used to be a minister woke up and found that his cornfield had been systematically decimated and a precise geographical pattern was laid out that could be seen from the air. He concluded it was some kind of prank which would have been the normal reaction of anyone. But when reports of the world wide similar crop defilings and then sitings of shadowy alien figures than the world is in a crisis mode.

    But the world is on the back-burner for Gibson. He was a clergyman but gave it up after the death of his wife who was hit by a drunk driver. He's got his own issues to deal with if he can get himself, his children Rory Culkin and Abigail Breslin and brother Joaquin Phoenix through the ordeal. All this without knowing how the world in general is coping. Gibson and the family can only speculate and that's where imaginations run wild.

    I have to say that Mel Gibson does a thoroughly good job as an everyman caught up in a global crisis. When War Of The Words was made by George Pal in the Fifties, the leads Gene Barry and Ann Robinson were scientists who had vital information for the survival of the world. The globe is still at risk in Signs, but Mel and his family can't worry about that, just in keeping themselves alive.

    Signs is thinking science fiction ranking up there with the best work of Ray Bradbury and John Heinlein. It's both entertaining and engrossing, you can't ask for more from a film.
    7Theo Robertson

    Moody , Atmospheric But Far From A Masterpiece

    !!!!! MILD SPOILERS !!!!!

    There's a lot to commend M Night Shyamalan's SIGNS for . It's not often we see such a moody atmospheric thriller about an alien invasion and I will praise this movie later . However Shyamalan shots himself in the foot by the way the story is told

    Crop circles appear outside the home of the Hess family and after Graham Hess and his brother Merril find out that it wasn't caused by local pranksters Graham's son Morgan comes up with the answer - It was done by aliens . He knows this because he read a book on the subject . Obviously everyone else in the world has read only one book - The same one as Morgan - because as soon as crop circles appear round the world it's the leading story and can mean only one thing: The aliens are coming . And sure enough just like everyone has predicted lights appear over Planet Earth's cities which herald the start of little green men come to wipe us out

    If someone told you crop circles were signs on an alien invasion how would you react ? Exactly but at no point does anyone question a possible invasion because it's taken as read by all the characters in the story which starts to become ridiculous when the world's broadcasters start interrupting programmes showing the world wide phenomenon of crop circles . Let's be honest here jet liners crashing into sky scrapers is a good reason to interrupt TV shows with 24 hour news reports but people finding crop circles all over the world is not

    There's one other thing : Ten year old Morgan seems to be channeling the minds of Newton , Darwin and Einstien . Listen to this kid's dialogue " Everything people have written about in science books is about to change " and there's several more instances of this . You can't take this child seriously or believe in him as a three dimensional character

    Make that two things : Why would aliens invade a planet whose surface is composed of 70% water ? Isn't the human body two thirds water anyway. Oh and how does Graham's neighbour know that the aliens don't like water anyway ?

    Better make that three things because if the subtext is about rediscovering ones faith then why is everyone certain of an approaching invasion ? Surely for this theme to work then Graham should have been shouting from the roof tops that aliens don't exist only to be proved wrong . If he's wrong about aliens then surely he's wrong about the non existence of the lord right ?

    It's a great pity that Shyamalan didn't think these things through a bit further because despite not ruining the movie these things stop SIGNS becoming a masterpiece of genre cinema which it certainly had the potential to be . Even a critical viewer like myself who noticed the flaws couldn't help being terrified by the climax in the cellar where for one heart stopping moment it looked like a couple of the characters had been abducted . As for the scene Graham sees the reflection in the TV .... I certainly can't fault the good bits and I will recommend this movie even to those who don't like SF/Horror very much . Certainly it's a radical change to watch a film like this that doesn't have tens of millions spent on special effects and the film works better for it . You reading this Mr Spielberg ?

    Shyamalan will best be remembered for THE SIXTH SENSE , a film that I found somewhat overrated while his follow up UNBREAKABLE was a masterpiece in my opinion . SIGNS is slightly different because it doesn't have one of those shock twist endings and when you consider what a poor film THE VILLAGE is one can't help thinking that Shyamalan would be better off abandoning clever endings and concentrating on terrifying audiences and I would wonder if he could get away with directing a Hollywood version of Nigel Kneale's QUATERMASS AND THE PIT . Now that would be worth queuing at the cinema for

    Update 30 dec : Some have mentioned that the concept of predestination is very important to understanding the movie ie the plot holes aren't actually plot holes viewed this way and while this makes absolute sense in a metaphysical way it still misses out on logic
    8lavaside-60237

    Honestly Shocked

    I'm honestly shocked this has a 6.8 on IMDb.

    A bunch of people used to a 'twist'?

    A bunch of people who think all alien movies must contain explosions?

    A combination of both?

    Great casting.

    Great acting.

    Great writing.

    Lots of tension.

    One of the most serious explorations of faith in cinema.

    Just an all around really good movie.

    Joaquin Phoenix steals the show.

    I will say, it does have a very morose vibe - being the back drop is everyone being sad because the mom had died. I wonder if that is what turned people off. The subject of aliens plays second fiddle to it.

    Yeah, if I had to put my finger on it, I'd bet that's it.
    xfile731

    Visually terrific

    M. Night Shyamalan has done it again, and this time, better. If 'Unbreakable' left skepticism about the young director, `Signs' will make you a believer again.

    Mel Gibson and his family, one boy, one girl, and Gibson's younger brother (Joaquin Phoenix) take residence in the small town of Bucks County, Pennsylvania. Gibson's wife is not a member of this household (we find out why, later). Shot over and around a 'Walton's-style' house and surrounded by crops, we get the eerie feeling that we are to be entangled here for the next two hours. Immediately, the children notice gigantic perfect circular shapes or signs as we like to call them, appearing within the crops. Is this a hoax or War of the Worlds? And, that's all you need to know. The rest of film will dazzle you with style, suspense, and downright scariness.

    The key ingredients to this recipe for storytelling is one half Close Encounters of the Third Kind, a dash of Stephen King, sprinkled with Orson Wells. Shyamalan also uses Hitchcock like close ups, wicked camera angles, and a blasting score. You are locked in as soon as the movie begins. You will tilt your head in wonder and confusion, as characters in the film do. There is a deep desire to figure this all out, while your stuck in the middle of nowhere, nowhere being Bucks County.

    The picture gives us two ultimate dilemmas to wrestle with. Two basic questions we must ask ourselves. Are our daily occurrences and the paths we choose Coincidence? Or, are is it just plain Luck? Shyamalan weaves these posing questions into a subplot, with trickery until the end. From scene to scene, he leaves no fades to black. As one scene ends the other smartly begins. That's what keeps the audience watching as if we were tucked tightly into our beds and rapidly turning pages of a good book. Each page is significant. This movie isn't just about crops. That's what makes Shyamalan such a keen filmmaker. He has the talent and ability to fog up the film, and distract you with different propositions.

    Shyamalan uses technique to peak his story, rather than dialogue. His masterful and favorite formula is the usage of flashbacks, which gives the audience a chance to catch up on what they might have missed. He emphasizes his points by re-occurring scenes and replaying them for the grand effect, the 11th hour, until he hits you with the finale. Whether you believe the outcome or not, you cannot deny his aptitude for storytelling.

    This nervous and paranoid feature film with a heart-pounding ending is terrific. I was still thinking about it when I left the theater. You too, will enjoy the ride. But, when it's over, say your prayers, get into bed, pull the sheets over your head, breathe a sigh of relief, and close the book!

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      Joaquin Phoenix replaced Mark Ruffalo, who had to pull out of the film due to a brain tumor. It was later found to be benign.
    • गूफ़
      They nail boards on the outside of inward-opening doors. Obviously this isn't going to prevent the doors from being opened, but anything is better than nothing and they're panicking anyway. Moreover, when Merrill asks Graham how they will know if boarding the windows will work, Graham replies, "Because they seem to have trouble with pantry doors". Graham is implying that if the aliens have trouble with pantry doors, boarding them can only help. Doing so also may give everyone, especially the children, a sense of hope and/or security.
    • भाव

      Graham Hess: People break down into two groups. When they experience something lucky, group number one sees it as more than luck, more than coincidence. They see it as a sign, evidence, that there is someone up there, watching out for them. Group number two sees it as just pure luck. Just a happy turn of chance. I'm sure the people in group number two are looking at those fourteen lights in a very suspicious way. For them, the situation is a fifty-fifty. Could be bad, could be good. But deep down, they feel that whatever happens, they're on their own. And that fills them with fear. Yeah, there are those people. But there's a whole lot of people in group number one. When they see those fourteen lights, they're looking at a miracle. And deep down, they feel that whatever's going to happen, there will be someone there to help them. And that fills them with hope. See what you have to ask yourself is what kind of person are you? Are you the kind that sees signs, that sees miracles? Or do you believe that people just get lucky? Or, look at the question this way: Is it possible that there are no coincidences?

    • क्रेज़ी क्रेडिट
      The end credits are black text that rolls over a black screen with a illuminated blue circle in the middle, instead of the traditional white text on a flat black background.
    • इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जन
      There is actually an alternative version of this movie, which had different noises for the aliens, prior to release. The noises did not make into the final product. The aliens sounded more demonic than the mostly (although equally scary) alien noises they ended up having. It alone could have gotten the movie an R on the basis of "terror" alone. It was mostly edited out to keep the movie from being too dark, although some of the things about the aliens were demonic, and kept in the movie. "Signs" got away with a lot for a PG-13 movie. To find them, via the comments, go to the Youtube video to the "Signs" trailer, courtesy of user Rob Jackson (the Rotten Videos group's copy of the video; just type "Signs 2002 trailer Rotten Videos," and look for Rob Jackson's comments, they have the links to some of the clips from that version; courtesy of user Kaylin Starlight).
    • कनेक्शन
      Edited into Signs: Deleted Scenes (2003)

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल

    • How long is Signs?
      Alexa द्वारा संचालित
    • When the Aliens communicate, why do they sound like squirrels?
    • What is "Signs" about?
    • Is "Signs" based on a book?

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 7 अगस्त 2013 (भारत)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
    • आधिकारिक साइट
      • Official site
    • भाषाएं
      • अंग्रेज़ी
      • पुर्तगाली
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • संकेत
    • फ़िल्माने की जगहें
      • Bucks County, पेंसिल्वेनिया, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका
    • उत्पादन कंपनियां
      • Touchstone Pictures
      • Blinding Edge Pictures
      • The Kennedy/Marshall Company
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    बॉक्स ऑफ़िस

    बदलाव करें
    • बजट
      • $7,20,00,000(अनुमानित)
    • US और कनाडा में सकल
      • $22,79,66,634
    • US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
      • $6,01,17,080
      • 4 अग॰ 2002
    • दुनिया भर में सकल
      • $40,82,47,917
    IMDbPro पर बॉक्स ऑफ़िस की विस्तार में जानकारी देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      1 घंटा 46 मिनट
    • रंग
      • Color
    • ध्वनि मिश्रण
      • Dolby Digital EX
      • SDDS
      • DTS
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 1.85 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    • IMDb जवाब: डेटा भरने में मदद करें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.