Dunsmore

Based on a true story, Dunsmore is a gritty, low budget redneck flick about small town bully Ronny Roy Pritcher (W. Earl Brown) who is such a despicable lowlife that he makes some of novelist Larry Brown's characters look like Ivy League Hamptons dwellers.

In the opening scene, Pritcher is blown away outside a bar by no less than 40 rounds of ammunition. The killer(s) are not revealed, but it's not difficult to surmise that they are a large group of townspeople who have simply had enough of him.

The rest of the film follows an investigator from the state attorney's office (Kadeem Hardison....and yes, he's black) as he interviews various victims of Pritcher's sadistic behavior, which is seen in flashbacks.

The film has a cheap look and feel to it, with passable cinematography and acting. Actually, the whole low budget vibe is appropriate to the subject matter.

This one of those films that you keep watching with a kind of horrified fascination. The characters are so unrealistic and over the top, it's pretty hard to take it seriously. On the plus side, veteran actor Barry Corbin plays the town's former sheriff in a small but significant role.

A brawny, devil-may-care bully named Ronny Roy Pritcher (Earl Brown) terrorizes the residents of the small town of Dunsmore. But very quickly into the plot, the bully gets gunned down outside the local tavern. Enter Walter Taylor (Kadeem Hardison), representative of the State's Attorney General's Office, to try to figure out what happened. Most of the plot centers on Taylor's investigation of the locals: deadbeats, hillbillies, trailer park ladies, and other stereotyped characters.

The script asks viewers to think about a couple of rather weighty issues. Is it right for someone to dispose of a bully when local law enforcement is ineffective? Is it right for a law enforcement outsider to intrude into a small town that seems able to handle its problems on its own?

Aside from the film's thematic value, I just didn't much care for this film. For one thing, the locations are all generic. The town of Dunsmore is not set in any particular state; we never learn what "state" Walter Taylor's Attorney General's Office represents. There's a conspicuous attempt to remove the story from any real location. With such a coy script, the film forgoes a sense of realism.

Further, the script has too many flashbacks. And the TV "news" coverage scenes, and scenes of TV reporters trying to get a story, are super, super annoying. Such a film cliché reeks of lazy scriptwriting. Kadeem Hardison phones in his performance, which is dull and lifeless. On the other hand, Jeannetta Arnette gives a really fine performance as the trailer park wife of Ronny Roy.

Overall, aside from deep themes implied in the story premise, I found this film to be mediocre at best. It gets off to a good start with some atmospheric suspense. But the plot goes nowhere; the ending disappoints, along with other elements. And I could have wished for some other actor to play the role of Walter Taylor.

Movies set in small towns in the south tend to have one of two storyline- racial tensions between white and black or a glimpse into the life of the poor town dwellers. "Dunsmore" centered around the murder of a town bully, played wonderfully by W. Earl Brown of Deadwood fame so I gave it a chance. The character he plays, Ronny Roy Pritcher, intimidates his way out of courtrooms and into getting anything he desires, including an underage girl. Within the first few scenes of the movie the audience can see every man, woman and child is afraid of him. However not much is said by the soon to be dead Pritcher so most of the movie relies on flashbacks. After Pritcher dies from multiple gunshot wounds, the press and the Attorney General's office are wondering who to blame.

Walter Taylor( Kadeem Hardison) , an Attorney General office member, is sent to look into the killing and make sure the sheriff is doing his job. His belief he's doing what's best for Pritcher, a man he didn't know, forces him to continue questioning the town to motive. It's evident in his words and actions he doesn't understand the world he's walked into but lets his ideas of justice lead him blindly. All the parts were played to perfection as when we first meet most characters their expressions and attitudes form our opinion of them. With most of the tales of people's relationships with Pritcher told in flashback it got to be a little momentous. Not to mention, after hearing the kind of man Pritcher was, what person would continue to help find him justice? I couldn't fathom it.

Even though I continued watching, I felt no real drive to find out who killed Ronny Pritcher. The stories of his brutality add up until even the viewer is hoping the Attorney General's man returns to the city and leaves things alone. From the beginning it's obvious who shoots Pritcher which left me wondering what the point of the movie was. Did the director intend for it to be a character study of the small town?

To me, this movie was well done but without twists or a shocking end, comes up short. If one wants to watch a bad criminal and bully meet their end then perhaps it is enjoyable. I on the other hand take my murder mystery movies with a little more mystery.

This is an awesome film depicting the dark side of life for one small town's citizen. All the characters seem very well done. It seemed that everyone had a motive for the crime that occurred, yet everyone had an alibi. Because it was a quite serious movie, i particularly liked the comic relief of Gilroy (i think was his name). He lightened up some of the situations. You have to wonder was that what he was really like or did he put this act on for the outsiders visiting the town. The bad guy is truly bad and you can see why what happens to him happens. I don't usually like flashbacks, but this film contains good use of them. The sheriff was a good character - his face is familiar, i think i have seen him on TV. Scary (for that town) to think that the film was "based on a true story!" Well done.

After a violent opening and a setup to let you get to know the characters, the movie keeps building momentum as we realize that nothing is really what it seems to be. In the end it makes you think about right and wrong without preaching at you. I highly recommend it.