Sex Files: Erotic Possessions

This anthogy mix between xfiles and skinmax usual films, is in fact an adaptation of several films including Maxie with Glenn Close. Just this time Griffin Drew isn't an amicable Ghost. Shauna is Claire aspirational actress with his husband Micheal (Jarod Carey) Rent a house of a dead Star of the 40s Valerie Parks (Drew). After having sex the Ghost appears and podés the guests specially Claire. Who has sex with everybody.

O'Brien has sex first in a film with an actor, then with her husband, then the Ghost appears and have sex with a 40s movie Star, then with Valerie, then with her husband Best friend, a director, her Best Friend and finally a psychist.

O'Brien was one of the youngest and more beautiful softporn starlets of the 90's, with a resamble of Demi Moore, specially her Ghost hair cut. Se had everything she ver started in the indie classic Go with Katie Holmes and Sarah Polley, she could carry a movie un her breast, I mean her shoulders.

What ver happened to her, like most of the softporn stars her career ended around 2003

The plot of this movie is practically irrelevant because the attractions to this movie are Amber Newman and Shauna O'Brien's "erotic possessions." Despite other people's comments, I feel that Shauna's big, round, gravity-defying breasts were the reason for watching. I especially liked the first two sex scenes. Man, Shauna has the best implants I've ever seen.

A cut above the usual soft-core cable flick. It seemed to have more production values, and a much better plot than most of the genre. The direction was rather arty, and it worked well most of the time. However, early in the film there was a glaring cut silence between scenes. Maybe there was some heavy-handed editing there. The surreal aspect of the story was a good way to avoid other plot complications, such as infidelities, and the accompanying sluttiness, that usually keeps one from liking the characters very much in this sort of film. I thought the acting was first rate, and the (long) simulated sex scenes okay. The star, Shauna O'Brien, while a beautiful woman, sports such an amount of silicone on her chest that she seems borderline deformed. I suppose a lot of people must find that attractive, or actresses would quit mutilating themselves in that way. Amber Newman and Griffin Drew suffer from the same malady, albeit to a lesser extent. (At least they didn't draw an immediate wince from me as soon as their tops came off.) Morgan Kelly had by far the best breasts in the movie, of a normal size, and they would actually move when she did. Aside from the silicone, all of the actresses did very well. This film is worth checking out.

Alternately, watch to see Shauna O'Brien's breasts defy the laws of

space and time. You'll certainly see plenty of them, and after the sixth sex scene featuring them you'll have little else to do then compute their mass-to-lift ratios.

The plots okay, but there are some odd edits and the usual "plot-jumping" that often occurs. At the end Claire goes into a coma, and we cut to "six months later" and she's fine. Wha?!?

Amber Newman is actually less creepy then usual - she seems to have her excessive-makeup problem reigned in, finally. There's plenty of onesomes (in a bathtub with erotically charged 16mm film - don't ask), twosomes of the usual soft-porn variety, and threesomes to go around. The plot kinda plods along: it's initially kind of interesting but in another odd scene the haunted film gets taken off to a lab somewhere by some minor character (Joel, and his immortal line, "My pants are too tight") for no reason that I can really tell. You get the impression the movie was cut short for the R-version (as someone else noted, the scene with the psychic and another potential threesome cuts short at the end).

It's a cut above the usual XXX-rated "ghost" hard-porn (or so I'm told :) ), and it has enough of a plot to keep you mildly interested. Shauna O'Brien isn't too bad an actress, but she's no Kira Reed.

I got several Cinemax channels as part of a package deal when I got cable, and I have to ask, are these movies the only kind they ever play? It seems like it, so since I'm up at 4 in the morning and bored, I decided to comment on this one. I'm really not sure what it's about, as all I saw were constant sex scenes. Which is ok, obviously that's the whole point of the movie, but come on. The acting is terrible, the women's breasts are so fake and deformed, and the sex scenes are not very believable. I mean, it's obvious from watching them that the characters couldn't possibly be having sex. So it just ends up being silly, not erotic. If you want a sex movie with no plot, terrible acting and hideously deformed women, go rent a real porn film. At least those have real sex in them. If you're a guy who just wants to look at naked chicks, try Playboy. At least then you don't have to put up with corny dialogue.