[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro

Angel Eyes

  • 2001
  • R
  • 1 घं 42 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
5.7/10
26 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
Jennifer Lopez in Angel Eyes (2001)
Home Video Trailer from Universal Studios Home Entertainment
trailer प्ले करें2:24
4 वीडियो
45 फ़ोटो
मनोवैज्ञानिक ड्रामाड्रामारोमांस

एक रहस्यमय आदमी एक साहसी महिला पुलिस अधिकारी की ओर आकर्षित होता है और एक असामान्य रिश्ता शुरू हो जाता है, क्योंकि सब कुछ वैसा नहीं होता जैसा दिखता है।एक रहस्यमय आदमी एक साहसी महिला पुलिस अधिकारी की ओर आकर्षित होता है और एक असामान्य रिश्ता शुरू हो जाता है, क्योंकि सब कुछ वैसा नहीं होता जैसा दिखता है।एक रहस्यमय आदमी एक साहसी महिला पुलिस अधिकारी की ओर आकर्षित होता है और एक असामान्य रिश्ता शुरू हो जाता है, क्योंकि सब कुछ वैसा नहीं होता जैसा दिखता है।

  • निर्देशक
    • Luis Mandoki
  • लेखक
    • Gerald Di Pego
  • स्टार
    • Jennifer Lopez
    • Jim Caviezel
    • Jeremy Sisto
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    5.7/10
    26 हज़ार
    आपकी रेटिंग
    • निर्देशक
      • Luis Mandoki
    • लेखक
      • Gerald Di Pego
    • स्टार
      • Jennifer Lopez
      • Jim Caviezel
      • Jeremy Sisto
    • 192यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 60आलोचक समीक्षाएं
    • 39मेटास्कोर
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
    • पुरस्कार
      • 3 जीत और कुल 5 नामांकन

    वीडियो4

    Angel Eyes
    Trailer 2:24
    Angel Eyes
    Angel Eyes
    Trailer 0:31
    Angel Eyes
    Angel Eyes
    Trailer 0:31
    Angel Eyes
    Angel Eyes
    Trailer 0:32
    Angel Eyes
    Angel Eyes
    Trailer 0:32
    Angel Eyes

    फ़ोटो45

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    + 38
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार49

    बदलाव करें
    Jennifer Lopez
    Jennifer Lopez
    • Sharon Pogue
    Jim Caviezel
    Jim Caviezel
    • Steven 'Catch' Lambert
    Jeremy Sisto
    Jeremy Sisto
    • Larry Pogue, Sr.
    Terrence Howard
    Terrence Howard
    • Robby
    Sonia Braga
    Sonia Braga
    • Josephine Pogue
    Victor Argo
    Victor Argo
    • Carl Pogue
    Monet Mazur
    Monet Mazur
    • Kathy Pogue
    Shirley Knight
    Shirley Knight
    • Elanora Davis
    Danny Mags
    Danny Mags
    • Larry Pogue, Jr.
    • (as Daniel Magder)
    Guylaine St-Onge
    Guylaine St-Onge
    • Annie Lambert
    • (as Guylaine St. Onge)
    Connor McAuley
    • Max Lambert
    Jeremy Ratchford
    Jeremy Ratchford
    • Ray Micigliano
    Peter MacNeill
    Peter MacNeill
    • Lieutenant Dennis Sanderman
    Eldridge Hyndman
    • Jamal
    Kari Matchett
    Kari Matchett
    • Candace
    Michael Cameron
    • Charlie
    Marcello Thedford
    Marcello Thedford
    • Peebo
    Dave Cox
    Dave Cox
    • K-Dog
    • निर्देशक
      • Luis Mandoki
    • लेखक
      • Gerald Di Pego
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं192

    5.726.2K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    JohnnyNoGood

    Under Appreciated

    There are many films in the past years that are so under appreciated, tossed

    away from theaters and dismissed by the masses. Films like Donnie Darko and

    Rounders fall into this category. And Angel Eyes follows their path. It's a very well-written, well-acted drama with the unstoppable Jim Caviezel and Jennifer Lopez. As many have said, this IS Lopez's best film to date and she truly shines. And Caviezel is amazing. He's one of my favorite actors and his performance,

    like all of his other films, is utterly spectacular. The dialogue is flawless and although the story takes a while to progress and the pacing is slow, Angel Eyes is worth checking out.
    Theoriginaltruebrit

    Out of the blue - a good movie.

    So let me set the scene here, I was in a motel, in the middle of nowhere, and was flicking through the channels of the limited cable that the motel offered... I spotted Jim Caveizel (or however on earth you spell his name) and put down the remote as he is an actor that I admire and respect. Of course JLo then came into the scene and my instinct was to pick up the remote and flick the channel but I didn't and I am glad that I made that decision. Not being a fan of JLo I have never seen Angel Eyes and had no reason to seek it out either on video or on the TV but hell when you are in a motel with limited cable options you don't have alot of choice right? Nevertheless, I was thoroughly delighted that I left the remote where it was and watched this movie because in the end I loved it. I loved it more for the subtle points than the big "hollywood this is a romance you better weep points." "Hang up and I'll call your machine" in this day and age how relevant is that? how many people (if they would be honest) would much rather talk to a machine than the person because it is impersonal and they can save face? The teeny tiny aspect of him playing the notes of the trumpet on her back as they were dancing... okay so I am married to a musician so that resonates with me but it spoke volumes, no matter how much he had tried to block it out, his soul was still there, and in his soul was his music. I thought both leads played their roles with skill and conviction. I was never quite sure (until the end of course) if Catch was a good guy or a bad guy, and I liked the fact that it kept me guessing. As I said I am not a JLo fan, in fact I could be described as quite the opposite but in this movie she played her part beautifully, with conviction and totally believably. Jim Caveizel as always was understated, calm and played his role with a sympathy that is rare to see. Loved this movie, and cannot wait to see it again. I will agree with everyone however about the advertising hype that surrounded it, they ended up portraying it as a psychological thriller, if they had stayed true to the story and advertized it for what it was, a beautiful romance, I think it would not have died as it did. Shame on the publicity people for burying such a fine film.
    5caspian1978

    A great movie that was promoted badly

    Do you remember the previews for Angel Eyes? Many of us don't. What few of us remember is a 30 second preview that ran only a handful of times that showed Jennifer Lopez as a female cop. That was it. Na drama, no emotion, the previews told the audience a story about a female police officer, nothing else. This is probably the biggest reason why nobody went to see this movie when it went to the cinema. Only when it hit the video stores, did people start wo watch. A beautiful film, Angel Eyes is a romance. Dealing with redemption, it deals with many degrees of love and hope. In fact, many people detail Jennifer Lopez as "Angel Eyes." This is not true. Take a deeper look and you will see that James Caviezel is the true Angel Eyes.
    6rosscinema

    Lopez shines in effective drama

    I have to admit two things, one is that I'm not a big Jennifer Lopez fan. Secondly, she's very good in this film. The film opens at the scene of a car accident and a female police officer (Lopez) is telling the survivor who is all banged up that everything will be okay and to look at her. Then the film shifts to a year later and Officer Sharon Pogue is a Chicago cop who doesn't relate well to others except other cops and hates the whole dating process. While in a diner with her fellow officers she notices a man (James Caviezel) across the street looking at her and then suddenly a car drives by and starts shooting the place up. Sharon takes chase after the car crashes and chases a youth down into a secluded area when she is ambushed and the youth gets her gun and is ready to kill her when out of the blue the man who was staring comes out and saves her.

    *****SPOILER ALERT*****

    Later in a bar she meets him again and talks to him. She asks him his name and all he says is "Catch". She's intrigued by him and he says he likes her but he says very little about himself. He wanders the streets a lot and also helps a handicapped woman named Elanora (Shirley Knight) with groceries. Meanwhile, Sharon has family trouble and her parents (Sonia Braga and Victor Argo) are going to renew their vows and she's not sure if she should go. When she was a young girl she called the police on her abusive father when he was beating her mother and after all these years he still has not forgiven her.

    This film was directed by Luis Mandoki who also has shown in earlier efforts that he has a good flair for portraying relationships with believable emotional attachments. The problem is the area of the story surrounding Catch. We know right from the get-go who he is and what he's hiding. The film goes just a tad too long and of course there is an upbeat ending. I think it would have been totally appropriate to have a more open ending with some questions on the future of the characters. But the film is enhanced by a very good performance by Lopez. Not only is she believable as a tough cop but we can understand her emotional problems dealing with others. Its a performance that rings true and reminded me of why so many people are intrigued by her. Her character is the core of the film (not Catch) and she does a terrific job of balancing her emotions between the tough cop and the lonely and vulnerable woman. This isn't a great film by any stretch of the imagination but it is an underrated one. One of Lopez's shining moments.
    8JuguAbraham

    A gem of a film, best appreciated after you dust off the dirt

    I stumbled on this film--because there was nothing obvious that made it look like a film worth your time. It's a film with a lot of misplaced evaluations. For instance, Jennifer Lopez was nominated for a "Razzie" award but the film shows a very fine effort from the lady. Again some comments on the photography infer the late cinematographer Piotr Sobocinsky has done a shoddy job because obvious Toronto landmarks appear in a film set in Chicago. This again is a fault of the Director and editor, not the cameraman who was one of the finest in his business (Kieslowski's "Dekalog" and "Three Colors--Red"). An intense viewing of the film affords the viewer to appreciate the opening shots, the alley shots, and the corridor shots that evoke feelings. It is quite different from the typical Hollywood camera-work.

    There are flaws in the film. The film jumps to situations without a build up--Catch appears on a life saving situation, seemingly out of nowhere; two beers appear on Catch's table in the restaurant, without him ordering the second; no mention is made of why Catch chose this name; etc.

    Yet despite those faults the film sails through as fine entertainment because of fine believable performances from Caviezel, Lopez, Sonia Braga, and Shirley Knight. The casting of these four was perfect (thank you Lopez for insisting on Caviezel!). The film is great entertainment because the film refrains from sex and promotes fine values--including family values, reconciliation, dealing with bereavement and doing good to make a better world. How many films are brave enough to deal with such subjects today without depicting sex and violence?

    The film touches on subplots that could have been fleshed out--Catch's lonely neighbor who invites him share a pizza, Catch's friend who recognizes him at the restaurant but Director Mandoki clearly steers clear to present the two psychologically wounded persons and their healing by coming together through a sheer accident. The film may be very Christian in character but it presents a very secular, humane scenario that will uplift any viewer. Though unevenly woven, the film has several sequences that show Mandoki has fine capabilities. One only wishes he took greater care of details.

    Flaws apart, the film is above average cinema that the publicity has shrouded by misplaced evaluations.

    इस तरह के और

    Enough
    5.8
    Enough
    El cantante
    5.5
    El cantante
    Bordertown
    6.0
    Bordertown
    The Wedding Planner
    5.4
    The Wedding Planner
    Angel Eyes
    4.4
    Angel Eyes
    Monster-in-Law
    5.6
    Monster-in-Law
    Maid in Manhattan
    5.4
    Maid in Manhattan
    Highwaymen
    5.6
    Highwaymen
    Madison
    6.3
    Madison
    Gigli
    2.7
    Gigli
    The Back-up Plan
    5.3
    The Back-up Plan
    Lila & Eve
    5.9
    Lila & Eve

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      Jennifer Lopez insisted that the part of Catch be played by Jim Caviezel even though she didn't even know his name. She had recently been impressed with his performance in The Thin Red Line (1998).
    • गूफ़
      The night before Catch and Sharon's breakfast date, we see that Sharon has a digital clock radio on her bedside table. The next morning Sharon is awakened by an old fashioned alarm clock. Later in the movie, a bedroom scene shows the digital clock radio back again and the old fashioned alarm clock gone.
    • भाव

      Catch: [Catch is at the cemetery looking at the headstones of his wife and son] Annie. Max. I don't want you to think I forgot you, it's just that I couldn't find you. I woke up and you were gone, everything was gone, it just disappeared in one minute. I couldn't remember that minute, I lost it, but I think I found it all now. I used a calculator, see. Do you know we get about 1500 minutes a day?, so I figured it out. I was 29 years old, three months and eight days, so it was minute number 14,500,980 or so. That's the one I lost and when I lost that minute, I guess I... I tried to lose it all, all the memories because it hurt so bad. I tried, but... but I couldn't do it. Max, you were sick that day, remember?, it was your birthday and you ate too much. Annie, you said ''Slow down, it's wet, okay?'' And you were right, I should have slowed down. I should have slowed down lots of times, but I didn't always listen. I didn't listen when you, when you said, ''Steve, just please spend more time.'' That day I made you smile, Max, remember? You looked at me and I made a face and then we all smiled. It was a great minute. It was. I'm so glad l found that minute and no matter what... no matter what, I won't forget anymore. I won't forget anymore, I love you.

    • क्रेज़ी क्रेडिट
      "Turning Away" performed by Mary Black (elevator and furniture scene) not listed in movie credits?!
    • इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जन
      All UK versions were cut to obtain a 15-rating. Warner Brothers had to remove the aggressive use of the word "cunt", or the film would have been rated 18.
    • कनेक्शन
      Featured in Siskel & Ebert & the Movies: A Knight's Tale/Angel Eyes/About Adam/The King Is Alive/Bread and Roses (2001)
    • साउंडट्रैक
      My Life
      Written by Dido (as Dido Armstrong), Rollo (as Rollo Armstrong) and Mark Bates

      Performed by Dido

      Courtesy of Cheeky Records, London / Arista Records, Inc.

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल18

    • How long is Angel Eyes?Alexa द्वारा संचालित

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 18 मई 2001 (यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
    • आधिकारिक साइट
      • Warner Bros.
    • भाषा
      • अंग्रेज़ी
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • Ojos de ángel
    • फ़िल्माने की जगहें
      • Elora, ओंटेरियो, कनाडा(Diving/Swimming Scene, Elora Gorge)
    • उत्पादन कंपनियां
      • Morgan Creek Entertainment
      • Franchise Pictures
      • The Canton Company
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    बॉक्स ऑफ़िस

    बदलाव करें
    • बजट
      • $5,30,00,000(अनुमानित)
    • US और कनाडा में सकल
      • $2,41,74,218
    • US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
      • $92,25,575
      • 20 मई 2001
    • दुनिया भर में सकल
      • $2,97,15,606
    IMDbPro पर बॉक्स ऑफ़िस की विस्तार में जानकारी देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      • 1 घं 42 मि(102 min)
    • रंग
      • Color
    • ध्वनि मिश्रण
      • DTS
      • Dolby Digital
      • SDDS
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 1.85 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.