राजकुमारी से शादी करने के लिए एक फ्रांसीसी व्यक्ति इंग्लैंड में है. वह मारी गई. एक जादूगर उसे हत्या से पहले की समय की यात्रा करने में मदद करता है - सिवाय इसके कि वो अप्रैल 2000, शिकागो पहुंच... सभी पढ़ेंराजकुमारी से शादी करने के लिए एक फ्रांसीसी व्यक्ति इंग्लैंड में है. वह मारी गई. एक जादूगर उसे हत्या से पहले की समय की यात्रा करने में मदद करता है - सिवाय इसके कि वो अप्रैल 2000, शिकागो पहुंच जाए. एक वंशज उसकी मदद करता है. वह 1100वीं सदी में लौटने के लिए किसी जादूगर की तलाश करता ह... सभी पढ़ेंराजकुमारी से शादी करने के लिए एक फ्रांसीसी व्यक्ति इंग्लैंड में है. वह मारी गई. एक जादूगर उसे हत्या से पहले की समय की यात्रा करने में मदद करता है - सिवाय इसके कि वो अप्रैल 2000, शिकागो पहुंच जाए. एक वंशज उसकी मदद करता है. वह 1100वीं सदी में लौटने के लिए किसी जादूगर की तलाश करता है.
- Purse Snatcher
- (as Eric Aviles)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
It gains, however, on two important counts. First, Malcolm McDowell's wizard, who has a much larger and more interesting part in this movie than the original wizard did in the first movie. Second, Christina Applegate's character. She is surprisingly good, and a delight to watch. She's never been a terrible actress, but here she's extraordinary. She plays a kind of good-hearted, intelligent and yet naive character that, to my knowledge, is quite different from the other characters she's played. Where she's often been an air-head bimbo, here she's genuinely appealing; even endearing.
It still does detract from the movie that, to a great degree, it merely goes through the motions of the original movie, trying to mimic the jokes and japes, and very often failing miserably. Still and all, it's worth watching and is better than it might have been.
I rate this one 7 out of 10. You should see the original, though, which is far more inspired and also gives a great impression of spontaneity. I rate the original version 10 out of 10. It's that good.
Four stars on the VitalBird scale. (****) (out of 5, not 10).
Unfortunately, the humour is not as good, the acting of the US supporting cast is not as good, and the plot makes far less sense than the original. Why would he be transported to Chicago? What are the odds his descendant lives in Chicago? The original was much more plausible - it was set in the same geographical area, so meeting one's descendants is not so ridiculous, and it created plenty of humour based on Sir Godefroy's shock to learn that his castle was now owned by the descendant of his moronic lackey, whereas his descendant lived in a modest 3 bedroom house.
For goodness sake, save your ticket money and get the original French version "Les Visiteurs" on video. It is a far better film.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाCount Thibault and André attack a red SUV, saying, "Look! A red dragon!" In the original French 1993 version, they demolish a yellow postal van, but first scare off its black driver, saying, "Look! A Moor!" The scene was changed for "racial sensitivity".
- गूफ़Thibault identifies himself to Julia as the Duke of Anjou. Thibault is from the 12th Century; the title Duke of Anjou was created in the 14th Century.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनThe UK distributor (Momentum Pictures) chose to cut several scenes (pouring bleach into bathwater, eating toxic disinfectant toilet cakes) and reduce sound of violent blows to achieve a "PG" rating.
टॉप पसंद
- How long is Just Visiting?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Прибульці в Америці
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Raglan Castle, Raglan, Monmouthshire, वेल्स, यूनाइटेड किंगडम(Castle Malfete)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $3,50,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $47,81,539
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $22,72,489
- 8 अप्रैल 2001
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $1,61,76,732
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 28 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1