Als je begrijpt wat ik bedoel

Sadly, the only full-length animation feature ever to emerge out of the Netherlands has a predictable story development and substandard animation that doesn't live up to contemporary standards, let alone today's standards. To put it mildly: the film is a grossly infantile simplification of Marten Toonder's immortal comic strip novel, which is full of subtle humor, to be appreciated at an up-grown level, with characters like caricatures of class society: the ruling classes (the marquis, sir Bommel himself, the mayor), their henchman (police commissioner Bulle Bas, the middle classes (the shopkeeper, the civil servant)and the everyday folk (mainly commoner Wammes Waggel, the childish goose). Now in the film, all this is spoiled by playing down the critical messages , aggravated by stupid animation: everything moves at the wrong time, expressions changing rapidly, lips not keeping up with speech etc. The redeeming factor is the voice acting, which is superb in almost every single case. The shopkeeper Grootgrut outdoes them all, except the marquis, who is played by Ger Smit, best remembered for a series of classic voices for animated TV-series De Fabeltjeskrant. Grootgrut is played by Paul Haenen, who is best known as Bert of Ernie of Sesame Street. The few songs are highly superfluous. Continuity: the eyes of miss Doddel change for white to yellow in almost every cut. Now for some faulty story telling: at the point at which Bommel and his dragon are arrested, the film jumps to a news report from which we learn they are at large. How's that? And why is the dragon prone to stealing? Is also not explained. All in all, the beast is utterly unconvincing. As is the film as a whole. Alas.

it is one of that lovely animations who remember the childhood in sweet light. nothing complicated, nothing extraordinary. only a Dutch classic book adaptation, with nice characters and nice humor, old values in honest clothes and moral as part of tradition. but that is far to transform it in boring film. because its ambition is only to conquer the young public and it is far by competition with Disney /Japanese universe. old fashion product, it can be useful for viewer who search an easy show who not gives revelations but only a kind of hot chocolate for soul. the interesting thing is the verdict about people by mayor. than, the roles to actors who reflects the serenity of small fable. and, sure, the friendship as heart of life.

"Als je begrijpt wat ik bedoel" is based on a very popular Dutch cartoon figure which whom whole generations grew up with. The movie knows to capture the comic book feeling on screen, which makes the nostalgic value of the movie very high.

Even though the movie has a fun feeling the undertone is dramatic and emotional, which is the most powerful thing of the movie. It is a movie that even the most tough adults will be moved by and it isn't unusual for some to shed some tears.

The character (even though they are animals) are very humane and realistic which makes the emotions work even better. The characters are brought to life by an excellent voice cast.

The quality however is not very good. The movie looks sloppy and outdated. The animations are pretty standard and simple but effective. There are some weird musical numbers that are far from good and also the music itself doesn't quite seem to fit the movie and is used at weird periods throughout the movie.

See it for the nostalgic value, however if you live outside the Netherlands or Belgium you can not fully appreciate this movie and it might not be worth your time.

7/10

http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

"Dexter the Dragon & Bumble the Bear" is an adaptation of a Dutch comic book series. Just like "The adventures of TinTin, the secret of the Unicorn" (2011, Steven Spielberg) it is based on multiple stories from the series. Unlike the TinTin adaptation the comic stories are translated to animation and not to a film with real actors. In this way the film remains closer to the original.

The "Bumble the Bear" comic stories occupy a special place in Dutch literature. The text is more important than in ordinary comic books and does not appear in text balloons inside the pictures but as freestanding text below the pictures.

Not only the place of the text in the story is noteworthy but also the language used. Some characters in the series use a very archaic version of the Dutch language. Some of their expressions have developed into almost proverbs.

The status of almost serious literature that this comic series has acquired is also due to the fact that some of the characters have their origins in the medieval story about the fox Reynard (between 1257 - 1271, Willem die Madocke maecte).

In my opinion the film does not do justice to the status of the stories of almost serious literature. In the film almost inevitably dialogue becomes less important than images. In some scenes this is an advantage. The ballroom scene is one image in the comic book but can be extened in the film. In general however the emphasis on images does not benefit the depth of the story.

Added value does have the fact that in the film the voices of the characters do come to live. The voice actors are well chosen. However to create this added value a film adaptation is not strictly necessary, a radio play suffices. These radioplays are made and to be honest they are more to my taste as a Bumble the Bear fan.

The previous commenter forgot to mention this movie is from 1983 and the comic itself is from 1947.

Don't try to compare this movie with today's standards. The movie is almost 40 years old. And it's completely in the style of the original comic.

It's a beautiful movie and great made. I would really recommended it. I enjoyed the movie when I was a kid and I'm sure children these days would enjoy it too.