Witch's Cradle

The temptation was to imagine a presumed story about a young woman initiated in witchcraftness , defined by pentagram on her forehead , feared , a victim of a trap .

Because except the rope strangling a man, the heart , the shots suggesting emptiness , the film offers no more.

A story in which witchcraft is , maybe, more a pretext and for director a good occasion of games of image for future films.

Being a Maya Deren film, the image is all, the story being only cloth for a provocative trip across images. In this case, easy to create , for viewer, large explanations with roots in black magic.

"Witch's Cradle" is Maya Deren's second film, made after her "Meshes of the Afternoon" which is her most celebrated piece. As is to be expected by all her work, it is avant-garde as always, but instead of a dream on film seems more like an abstract impressionistic piece. Apparently also unfinished for reasons unknown--like several of the director's movies--the footage is choppy and unedited with no title cards at all. Interestingly, the artist Marcel Duchamp--who signed a urinal and called it art--took part in the short as well, and the director supposedly does not appear in it at all as she did in many of her films (although she appears to be briefly seen at the table with Duchamp in a couple shots. Despite the aforementioned choppy look of the footage, the film is really quite good.

How could you describe a short like this? I find it hard. The film takes place in a dark room, and it's basically a series of shots of string and people. There's one woman who has a witch's symbol on her head who keeps looking around, and much of the film is a lot of camera angles that show the string looped around the room, running over people's backs and other things. While in a film like this I would normally look for symbolism in the imagery, I think Deren was more trying to make an art film than entwine a symbolic narrative. Also, some of the shots are repeated. It is just very different and there are some parts that are random, such as a beating human heart which is entirely unconnected to the rest of it. In fact, most of what takes place in the movie is extremely incoherent and there doesn't appear to be any real action going on.

I have no idea why it wasn't finished. Maybe Deren had an idea for a new film, or maybe she just was clueless about how to end it. But I like it. An artistic film, and well shot. The bizarre camera angles add a sense of mystery. If you like this kind of filmmaking, then I'd certainly recommend this second effort by Deren, although be forewarned that it does tend to go more for randomness unlike her other more straightforward efforts. With that said, a really different work and one that won't disappoint fans of surrealism.