अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंProperty developer Jamie has to evict some weird, post-modern hippies from a building. But they slowly drag him into their dark underworld of bizarre rituals and dangerous liaisons.Property developer Jamie has to evict some weird, post-modern hippies from a building. But they slowly drag him into their dark underworld of bizarre rituals and dangerous liaisons.Property developer Jamie has to evict some weird, post-modern hippies from a building. But they slowly drag him into their dark underworld of bizarre rituals and dangerous liaisons.
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
This film is about a concept which most people don't tend to think about: how could a group of people isolate themselves from surroundings which they don't like and manage to lead a paradisiac life? Admittedly the story is sometimes a bit silly, but if you complain about these things you're missing the point, which is about how willing people might be to leave their current life, job, wife, etc. I really liked this film, and it's a shame it's not available to buy.
I will confess that the movie had me intrigued almost from the very beginning about who these people were who were basically squatting in a building in a crime infested part of London that had been purchased by a developer hoping to transform the area. The company sends Jamie (Jeremy Northam) in to basically get them to leave and they refuse. But he does discover that they're a very unusual community - dressed all in black, under the leadership of Emily (Joely Richardson) and living a weirdly erotic and even cult-like existence, with even the tough neighbourhood that surrounds them being afraid of them. Jamie is gradually drawn in with them, especially attracted to Emily, and starts to basically lead a double life. The group is mysterious. Who are they? Why is everyone so afraid of them? I have to confess that for a fleeting moment at the start of the movie as they were introduced I thought this might turn into some type of horror move. Dressed all in black, I thought perhaps this was going to be revealed to be a community of vampires or witches or something. But no. Nothing like that.
And, ultimately, that was the biggest weakness of the movie for me. The movie kept me watching from start to finish to learn about this group and who they were - but in the end there really wasn't much resolution. I never got a true sense of what this group was about. They had a weird kind of relationship with a cult of some sort that operated in the area; they had a relationship apparently with Japanese business interests - but who were they? What was the appeal? How did Emily recruit them - and why did she start in the first place? As this came to an end, the whole movie felt a bit like a big tease that didn't give any real resolution. The group in the end just seems to come off as a group of people who've dropped out of society - except they haven't, as evidence by their clear materialism and overtly hedonistic lifestyle. So, in other words, the movie left me as I began with it - asking "who are these people?"
It's a BBC production and, frankly, its production values feel dated. (Admittedly, this is 27 years old, but it felt even older.) I'm not sorry that I watched it. It was intriguing, but in the end it failed to really explain things adequately. (5/10)
And, ultimately, that was the biggest weakness of the movie for me. The movie kept me watching from start to finish to learn about this group and who they were - but in the end there really wasn't much resolution. I never got a true sense of what this group was about. They had a weird kind of relationship with a cult of some sort that operated in the area; they had a relationship apparently with Japanese business interests - but who were they? What was the appeal? How did Emily recruit them - and why did she start in the first place? As this came to an end, the whole movie felt a bit like a big tease that didn't give any real resolution. The group in the end just seems to come off as a group of people who've dropped out of society - except they haven't, as evidence by their clear materialism and overtly hedonistic lifestyle. So, in other words, the movie left me as I began with it - asking "who are these people?"
It's a BBC production and, frankly, its production values feel dated. (Admittedly, this is 27 years old, but it felt even older.) I'm not sorry that I watched it. It was intriguing, but in the end it failed to really explain things adequately. (5/10)
Dropped from a theatrical release and shown late on BBC2, 'The Tribe' iso one of the 150 films made each year in Britain which fails at the distribution hurdle. Which is a shame, because as an experience there are few films as strange, tingly and beautiful.
A reluctant Northam finds himself in the position of having to evict a long standing cult from a fabulous piece of real estate. He is amazed to find a group of people who seem to be happy to live within on the edges of society, who are happy with their own company but happy to use the world around them from nature to people as they see fit. As he is drawn into their world he finds that he can only be the agent of its destruction.
It's a theme which in many ways was covered a little more successfully in 'Pleasantville' and in countless films about rain forests. Working better in this film is the theme of the outsider in society - the twist being how much like them we would like to be. Years before 'The Matrix' we have people in long black coats striding arrogantly through their landscape, through city parks and the inner city. The bystanders look on with a mixture of discust and envy.
Richardson offers an enigmatic performance, as do the other 'are you in it too?' members of the tribe. Like Northam we don't know who they are and its at only very infrequent moments that we see the cracks below their reserve. By offering such understated performances, we find ourselves trying to reflect into them. Our imaginations try to work out their former lives.
Whilst we know the ending is innevitable, like the lead character we are happy to be taken along for the ride . . .
A reluctant Northam finds himself in the position of having to evict a long standing cult from a fabulous piece of real estate. He is amazed to find a group of people who seem to be happy to live within on the edges of society, who are happy with their own company but happy to use the world around them from nature to people as they see fit. As he is drawn into their world he finds that he can only be the agent of its destruction.
It's a theme which in many ways was covered a little more successfully in 'Pleasantville' and in countless films about rain forests. Working better in this film is the theme of the outsider in society - the twist being how much like them we would like to be. Years before 'The Matrix' we have people in long black coats striding arrogantly through their landscape, through city parks and the inner city. The bystanders look on with a mixture of discust and envy.
Richardson offers an enigmatic performance, as do the other 'are you in it too?' members of the tribe. Like Northam we don't know who they are and its at only very infrequent moments that we see the cracks below their reserve. By offering such understated performances, we find ourselves trying to reflect into them. Our imaginations try to work out their former lives.
Whilst we know the ending is innevitable, like the lead character we are happy to be taken along for the ride . . .
Intelligent and thoughtful, this tv play tackles the difficult and complex problems raised by religious and other cults, the way they isolate their members from the outside world and build barriers around themselves to prevent intrusions. It's subtle, especially in comparison with a recent film with Kate Winslett on the same subject, perhaps too subtle in its ironic substitution of material goods for spiritual: this cult is capitalist, selling electrical goods rather than religious dogma. But although the comments here already show that this is a provocative and controversial film, I wanted to record my own positive reaction to it: I found it valuable and challenging - and it's not only the lovely Anna Friel who disrobes; there's an early sighting of all of the increasingly splendid Jonathan Rhys-Myers to enjoy. If you can get sight of it, I think this is worth viewing.
I feel this movie was an unusual look at tolerance, greed and peolpe's willingness to stick by each other, and how outside influences can kill a tribe , much like the missionaries did to the native populations in certain areas of the world.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाAnna Friel's most intimate scenes include a three-in-a-bed romp with co-stars Jeremy Northam and Jonathan Rhys-Myers. Anna admits she was terrified at the thought of filming the sex scene with Jeremy and Jonathan. She said: "On the day of the bedroom scenes, I got incredibly nervous. When I got on set, it was the most unsexy feeling I've ever had, but it wasn't nearly as bad as I thought it was going to be."
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Points of View: एपिसोड #31.20 (1998)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is The Tribe?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Племя
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Crystal Palace Park, Penge, लंदन, इंग्लैंड, यूनाइटेड किंगडम(Site of old Palace)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि
- 1 घं 45 मि(105 min)
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.35 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें