अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA CIA agent has to stop a former associate who has stolen a weapon which kills people without harming buildings, all before he is to get married in a few days.A CIA agent has to stop a former associate who has stolen a weapon which kills people without harming buildings, all before he is to get married in a few days.A CIA agent has to stop a former associate who has stolen a weapon which kills people without harming buildings, all before he is to get married in a few days.
Mark Adair-Rios
- Momo
- (as Mark Adair Rios)
Dave Richards
- Dr. Martin Adler
- (as David Richards)
J.R. Yenque
- Tomas Martinez
- (as Jose Yenque)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
In watching, I should say wasting, my time with this film, I couldn't help but notice at least 4 scenes in the movie which were in "Clear & Present Danger".
The scene with the Columbia mansion, the blowing up of the airplane in the hanger, the view of the Capital in Washington DC and scenes of the Columbia jungle were all in "Clear and Present Danger".
Don't waste your time with this turkey ...
The scene with the Columbia mansion, the blowing up of the airplane in the hanger, the view of the Capital in Washington DC and scenes of the Columbia jungle were all in "Clear and Present Danger".
Don't waste your time with this turkey ...
The plot is hackneyed and I believe that some of the footage was actually taken from Top Gun and Patriot Games. This is just a BAD movie, which is a pity because Baldwin has done some quality stuff in the past, and Eleniak is actually a good actress. However, it seems that both need to do projects like this to pay their mortgages.
A government agent (Daniel Baldwin) must find a stolen secret military weapon before a renegade (Richard Tyson) wreaks havoc upon the world.
Please, don't expect a masterpiece, but, in my opinion, it's a very watchable movie!
I know...there are better films in this genre... But it doesn't deserve the grade that many are giving here.
The plot is simple, and similar to the most action movies. The film's outcome is not surprising, it is quite predictable.
The action scenes are well done!
The cast's performance is good. Daniel Baldwin, Richard Tyson and Erika Eleniak were fine.
The ending is classic, don't expect surprises!
Rating: 6/10.
Please, don't expect a masterpiece, but, in my opinion, it's a very watchable movie!
I know...there are better films in this genre... But it doesn't deserve the grade that many are giving here.
The plot is simple, and similar to the most action movies. The film's outcome is not surprising, it is quite predictable.
The action scenes are well done!
The cast's performance is good. Daniel Baldwin, Richard Tyson and Erika Eleniak were fine.
The ending is classic, don't expect surprises!
Rating: 6/10.
The Pandora Project looks (and smells) like an ordinary action-movie, but the film is quite good. The action is ok, it is exiting. The bad thing about the movie is the end which is predictable. Specialy when Erika get caught by the bad guy.
Ok, ok, I know. Still, after HLOTS, Trees Lounge and Vampires; if I see one he's in, I take a peek. He's the only Baldwin brother who can truly act, when he has the script *or*, as I see here, when he has enough direction keeping him from just walking through a movie he obviously made just to pay bills. The poor acting by all involved was painful to watch.
Not that there's much to do in this one here, the plot is lame, unexciting and predictable and the filming routine and uninspired.
After someone once adamantly told me, that for a screenwriter to be read at all means a break of luck, to be produced is like winning the state lottery and how much horrid, amateur scripts are out there through which producers have to wade, well after that I keep wondering just how duds like this one sneak past. Because this *is* a bad story, a bad plot, a bad film, an entire waste of people's time -- where did they get the money for it?
My high school students write better.
Not that there's much to do in this one here, the plot is lame, unexciting and predictable and the filming routine and uninspired.
After someone once adamantly told me, that for a screenwriter to be read at all means a break of luck, to be produced is like winning the state lottery and how much horrid, amateur scripts are out there through which producers have to wade, well after that I keep wondering just how duds like this one sneak past. Because this *is* a bad story, a bad plot, a bad film, an entire waste of people's time -- where did they get the money for it?
My high school students write better.
क्या आपको पता है
- गूफ़The ensign on the carrier who brings secret orders to Lacy is listed as "Ensign Newbie" in the credits, but his name tag spells the name as "Newby".
- भाव
CIA Director Garrett Houtman: I've got two words for you.
Sam Davis: Good luck?
CIA Director Garrett Houtman: John Lacy.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनThe UK version is cut by 3s for a '15' rating.
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Pandora Projesi
- उत्पादन कंपनी
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 29 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें