[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंसबसे बढ़िया 250 फ़िल्मेंसर्वाधिक लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशो का समय और टिकटफ़िल्मों से जुड़ी खबरेंइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    टीवी और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैसबसे बढ़िया 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय टीवी शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंटीवी न्यूज़
    देखने के लिए क्या हैनए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका आज जन्म हुआसबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    सहायता केंद्रकंट्रीब्यूटर ज़ोनपॉल
उद्योग पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro

Repligator

  • 1996
  • Not Rated
  • 1 घं 26 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
3.0/10
532
आपकी रेटिंग
Repligator (1996)
Official Trailer
trailer प्ले करें1:09
1 वीडियो
72 फ़ोटो
ActionComedySci-Fi

अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंArmy experimentation with transporter devices accidentally turns people into alligators.Army experimentation with transporter devices accidentally turns people into alligators.Army experimentation with transporter devices accidentally turns people into alligators.

  • निर्देशक
    • Bret McCormick
  • लेखक
    • Keith Kjornes
    • T.G. Weems
    • Wynn Winberg
  • स्टार
    • Gunnar Hansen
    • Keith Kjornes
    • Randy Clower
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    3.0/10
    532
    आपकी रेटिंग
    • निर्देशक
      • Bret McCormick
    • लेखक
      • Keith Kjornes
      • T.G. Weems
      • Wynn Winberg
    • स्टार
      • Gunnar Hansen
      • Keith Kjornes
      • Randy Clower
    • 13यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 16आलोचक समीक्षाएं
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • वीडियो1

    Repligator
    Trailer 1:09
    Repligator

    फ़ोटो71

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    + 67
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार28

    बदलाव करें
    Gunnar Hansen
    Gunnar Hansen
    • Dr. Kildare - Male
    Keith Kjornes
    • Dr. Oliver
    Randy Clower
    Randy Clower
    • Dr. Fields - Male
    TJ Myers
    TJ Myers
    • Dr. Hardy
    Carl Merritt
    • Col. Sanders - Male
    Brinke Stevens
    Brinke Stevens
    • Dr. Goodbody
    Alan York
    • Gen. Mills
    Rocky Patterson
    • Col. Sargeant
    Tyler Mason
    • West - Male
    James Michael Taylor
    • Pvt. Bruno
    Grady Niblo
    • Watson
    T.G. Weems
    • Ripley
    James Bock
    • Pvt. Libo
    • (as James C. Bock)
    Janet Elaine
    • Dr. Kildare - Female
    T. Seret Gomez
    • Col. Sanders - Female
    Karen Alexander
    • Brainwashed Hooker
    Melanie Stewart
    • Mrs. Libo
    Amy Beghtel
    • Buffy
    • निर्देशक
      • Bret McCormick
    • लेखक
      • Keith Kjornes
      • T.G. Weems
      • Wynn Winberg
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं13

    3.0532
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    1AMIO-PatricioMunoz

    An Inspiration

    This film is an inspiration to young movie makers.

    This film is a terrible waste of tape but not a waste of time.

    If you are a young filmmaker and you're feeling down on your luck when it comes to getting something put together... then see if you can get your hands on this movie.

    It's obvious that these movie makers somehow found enough money to make alligator costumes and various special effects (although very cheesy). It was shot on film & transferred to an AVID NLE system (composer). They had money. Not Hollywood money, but the equipment they used does not come cheap… I'd guess about 10-20 thousand dollars… beginning to end.

    It's a simple story, with terrible acting! I get a sense that this story was written overnight by somebody with ADD and an overactive imagination… on a post-it note. Who gave these people money to make this wretched thing? I don't want to be too critical of it. Every now and then, I like to see a film like this to remind myself that there are worse things out there being made all the time! :-) My GOD... listen to the music!! It sounds like it was written and recorded by my grandmother! Oh my gosh... people actually put their names on this production?! What an embarrassment... this is not portfolio material.

    I tried to find the production company responsible for this, but it appears that they may no longer be around… gee, I wonder why.

    I say, if you can find it at your local rental store for less than 99c CAN, then check it out. Be warned, it is a bad movie.
    8tugmyrugplz

    Ahead of its time! (ps: nogodnomasters, paul_haakonsen)

    As the title suggests this 1996 movie was very much ahead of its time.

    Look if you're looking for spectacular graphics and beautiful scenery then go watch Oppenheimer. This movie is like a teenage boys fever dream. It's weird, it makes no sense and it has boobs in it.

    I laughed within the first 30 seconds of the film and it wasn't a snort of derision, it was a real laugh. It's obvious to me, but apparently lost on the other reviewers to this film, that the whole thing was made for fun and stupidity.

    It probably cost next to nothing to make and it looks like the actors are having a laugh. So don't be an idiot, don't judge this as if it was high art because it so obviously isn't.

    Lastly this is for all the naysayers out there, cough, nogodnomasters, paul haakenson. Apparently have not seen this hidden gem yet. But one thing I do know, they will "stumble" upon this gem and give their "expert" opinions. Just remember I was here first. I am waiting gents. Until then- I won!
    6Floated2

    Cheesy lower budget yet intriguing

    A rather lower budget sci- fi film about scientists conducting experiments on patients regarding genetics for their own goods. As expected these experiments go wrong as the men are being transformed into women then once get turned on somehow their heads get morphed into alligators.

    The acting isn't anything great as this isn't a film to be taken serious. The dialogue is quite cheesy and subpar. Nothing is exactly funny or unintentionally funny but seeing the low budget special effects is something.

    With its flaws, there is a sense of entertainment and the film isn't exactly predictable. There is more skin shown than necessary as it scattered throughout in glimpses. Simply a film to pass time but credit should be given for its originality.
    stevemc

    Good fun

    This film is a great farce, professionally done and worth seeing.
    1A_Roode

    No redeeming qualities. Actually there is one.

    I have challenged my masochistic urge to sit through the worst of moviedom's offerings. What does not kill you makes you stronger, right? Wrong. I'm now convinced it makes you stupider for having gone through it in the first place. I love movies. I love b-movies. I even love bad movies and making my friends sit very uncomfortably through them. But after watching 'Repligator' I've come to the unpleasant conclusion that apparently I don't love myself at all. 'Repligator' is beyond terrible and there is no thesaurus big enough to list the many ways in which 'Repligator' is awful, terrible, bad ...

    Filmed with extreme cheapness (was this project a tax write-off? was it some kind of scam to con government film-funding and other private investors?) and a level of professionalism well-suited to semi-evolved chimpanzees, 'Repligator' fails in every possible category of film. Name one and it fails. The music is distractingly awful and completely out of place. The writing is awful. The acting is beyond cheesy. Or maybe it is just so ... minimalist in its approach that IT DOESN'T EXIST. Direction, editing, camera work, special effects -- nothing works in this film and the whole thing seems like an exercise in how to make stupid people (me for watching) pay for their stupidity (me for watching) with the most pain (me by watching). Even if you're a fan of gratuitous nudity (and there is plenty) it isn't worth it.

    There are no redeeming qualities, save for one: 'Repligator' is clear proof that no matter how low-budget, no matter how bad your film can be, there IS a sucker born every minute. Many of those suckers have money. Find them, milk them for everything you can, and you too can make a movie.

    इस तरह के और

    Embrace of the Vampire
    4.4
    Embrace of the Vampire
    We Are Wolves
    3.4
    We Are Wolves
    Ski School
    4.9
    Ski School
    Joysticks
    4.5
    Joysticks
    Road to Revenge
    4.1
    Road to Revenge
    Raw Force
    5.4
    Raw Force
    Last Night at Terrace Lanes
    4.4
    Last Night at Terrace Lanes
    Mardi Gras Massacre
    4.0
    Mardi Gras Massacre
    Assault of the Party Nerds
    3.8
    Assault of the Party Nerds
    Maggots
    4.6
    Maggots
    Virtual Encounters
    4.1
    Virtual Encounters
    Sweet Sugar
    5.1
    Sweet Sugar

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      Keith Kjornes fractured his right shoulder doing the stunt in his office which made the cut and was the only take.
    • गूफ़
      Private Waring, while playing a substantial part in the film, is not listed in the credits.
    • भाव

      Dr. Goodbody: Any questions?

      Pvt. Libo: Will I get a woodie, sir? Ma'am? Sir.

    • क्रेज़ी क्रेडिट
      This film is a complete work of fiction. There is no government cover up involving the REPLICATOR PROJECT. Really! Any similarity between the characters in this film and real people is, while pathetic, a coincidence.
    • कनेक्शन
      Featured in Screaming in High Heels: The Rise & Fall of the Scream Queen Era (2011)

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल15

    • How long is Repligator?Alexa द्वारा संचालित

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 1 जनवरी 1996 (मैक्सिको)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
    • भाषा
      • अंग्रेज़ी
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • Реплигатор
    • फ़िल्माने की जगहें
      • Irving, टेक्सस, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      1 घंटा 26 मिनट
    • रंग
      • Color
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 1.85 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    Repligator (1996)
    टॉप गैप
    What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for Repligator (1996)?
    जवाब
    • और अंतराल देखें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.