[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    EmmysSuperheroes GuideSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideBest Of 2025 So FarDisability Pride MonthSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
IMDbPro

What I Have Written

  • 1996
  • 1 घं 42 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
6.9/10
84
आपकी रेटिंग
What I Have Written (1996)
ड्रामारहस्य

अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंTruth and fiction collide when sexual obsession leads to betrayal. A voyage of discovery realigns subject, object and victim - things are not always as they seem.Truth and fiction collide when sexual obsession leads to betrayal. A voyage of discovery realigns subject, object and victim - things are not always as they seem.Truth and fiction collide when sexual obsession leads to betrayal. A voyage of discovery realigns subject, object and victim - things are not always as they seem.

  • निर्देशक
    • John Hughes
  • लेखक
    • John A. Scott
  • स्टार
    • Martin Jacobs
    • Gillian Jones
    • Jacek Koman
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    6.9/10
    84
    आपकी रेटिंग
    • निर्देशक
      • John Hughes
    • लेखक
      • John A. Scott
    • स्टार
      • Martin Jacobs
      • Gillian Jones
      • Jacek Koman
    • 5यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 1आलोचक समीक्षा
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
    • पुरस्कार
      • 2 जीत और कुल 5 नामांकन

    फ़ोटो6

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार22

    बदलाव करें
    Martin Jacobs
    • Christopher Houghton…
    Gillian Jones
    • Frances Bourin…
    Jacek Koman
    Jacek Koman
    • Jeremy Fliszar
    Angie Milliken
    Angie Milliken
    • Sorel Atherton…
    Margaret Cameron
    • Clare Murnane
    Nick Lathouris
    Nick Lathouris
    • Claude Murnane
    Fiona Stewart
    Fiona Stewart
    • Meredith
    Julie Forsyth
    • Dr. Williams
    Bronwen Gault
    • Duty Nurse
    Libby Stone
    • Departmental Secretary
    Ian Scott
    • Alan Gough
    Jillian Murray
    Jillian Murray
    • Janet Gough
    Daniel Witton
    • Young Man
    Terry Kenwrick
    • Older Man
    John Flaus
    John Flaus
    • Richard Morris
    Isabelle Pichaud
    • Receptionist…
    Claude Bellity
    • Beggar Man
    Chantal Maoudj
    • Old Woman (Châtel-Guyon)
    • निर्देशक
      • John Hughes
    • लेखक
      • John A. Scott
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं5

    6.984
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    6Steven Reynolds

    Interesting adaptation of an excellent novel

    Several months after returning from a trip to Europe with his wife, a poet has a near-fatal stroke. While he lies in a coma, a colleague presents the poet's wife with a novella the poet had been secretly writing at the time of his accident. The manuscript narrates their European sojourn, and suggests that the poet has been carrying on an affair, by mail, with a woman they both met in Paris. But all is not what it seems. Psychologically, this is fascinating territory, although the often unsignaled time and character shifts will be confusing for those unfamiliar with the brilliant novel on which this film is based. Those who are familiar with the novel will find it interesting to observe the way Scott and Hughes reconfigure the material for a different medium - but it loses a lot of its force because you know the delightful twist from the beginning. Read the novel first. It's magnificent. You'll then find both it and this film more enjoyable.
    8videorama-759-859391

    What has been written, forms good Art-house cinema

    Here's one of those movies, Art-house, so delicately handled in it's relationship of story and characters, it becomes quite eerie, and you become more concerned than you should. The delicately handling of story is what really impressed me about this movie, which some people will find boring and turn off. But if you sit it out and give it a chance, it pays off. The acting is A level from everyone, although it was Koman as the envious friend of Milliken (also just superb) who I really took notice of. What else has this actor done? The story is one of betrayal, the partner, Milliken, unforgiving of her sick husband's (Jacobs) infidelity, via a manuscript, his best friend, Koman, a book publisher, possesses. We go back and forth to the catalyst, being the mistress, Jacob's character (a budding writer) becomes infatuated with at a book reading. Later in time, he breaks it off, then falls ill, where guilt has him, and a betrayal is realized, through pages of his writing, where for Milliken, it becomes a detective's puzzle. Although the film scored an R rating, it's only due to a couple of pornographic still images, so you birdwatchers, will be left high and dry. I'm glad I saw this one out, as these are the kind of films that should be appreciated, and warrant viewing from Oz audiences, not just the Art-house movie connoisseurs. Ending is a stinger, one of heartlessness, for one greedy party.
    6DukeEman

    Powerful pictures - Good book.

    An experimental feature that crosses over a few genres and through three different narrators during the surreal journey. Interesting enough to make you want to read the book instead! The greatest asset is the technical side that gives it that polish look thanks to the photography, music and editing
    6Groverdox

    A noble failure

    It may be unfair to describe 1996's "What I Have Written" as a forgotten movie. I was around in '96 and I don't recall ever hearing about it. To be forgotten, people have to have been aware of its existence at some stage, right? The movie is basically a noble failure. It's experimental, but the experiment doesn't quite come off. It's the kind of movie you want to like more than you do, and it should definitely be better known just so its attempt can be witnessed by budding filmmakers.

    The movie is strange and impressionistic. There is very little dialogue, but lots of monologue. Much of the movie is told through freeze-frames. This has the predictable effect of slowing the movie down so much that after a while you can almost hear the screech. You also, in all probability, start doing other things while you wait for something more interesting to happen on screen.

    Nevertheless, it manages to tell a cohesive story. It's the sort of mature indie drama that was around quite a bit in the nineties. It reminds me of that other Australian flick from that era, "Proof", with Russell Crowe and Hugo Weaving. Unfortunately, none of the actors have their interest.

    Watching an hour-and-a-half movie in freeze frame, with a new image every few seconds instead of the standard 24 images in one second, is like watching a snail cross the road. There's no point watching it for the whole journey. You can go away and do other things, come back, and check on its progress.

    That's what "What I Have Written" is like.

    इस तरह के और

    Praise
    6.7
    Praise
    Vacant Possession
    7.2
    Vacant Possession
    Crush
    6.0
    Crush
    Fu sheng
    6.9
    Fu sheng
    Return Home
    6.6
    Return Home
    Gibel Otrara
    7.4
    Gibel Otrara
    Offret
    7.9
    Offret

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 11 जुलाई 1996 (ऑस्ट्रेलिया)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • ऑस्ट्रेलिया
    • भाषा
      • अंग्रेज़ी
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • Det står skrevet
    • फ़िल्माने की जगहें
      • मेलबोर्न, विक्टोरिया, ऑस्ट्रेलिया(location)
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      1 घंटा 42 मिनट
    • रंग
      • Color
    • ध्वनि मिश्रण
      • Dolby Digital
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 1.85 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    What I Have Written (1996)
    टॉप गैप
    By what name was What I Have Written (1996) officially released in Canada in English?
    जवाब
    • और अंतराल देखें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.