उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं

The Rugrats Movie was enjoyable, not quite as good as Rugrats In Paris, but it is solid and colourful. Of course the film isn't without its flaws. The second half was rather loud for my liking, and while the story is simple, which is fine by me, there are bits where the film drags and it doesn't quite have the sense of fun that makes the show so enjoyable. That said though, the film is very, VERY cute and means well. While it is by all means a kids movie, there are a handful of laughs and references to other films for adults. I particularly loved Phil's "I didn't know she could fly"(in reference to Angelica) and Lil replies "I think it's because she's a witch." The animation is colourful and true to that of the show, and the soundtrack is great. The voice cast is especially strong, with Tara Strong, EG Daily and Christine Cavanaugh as standouts. Though as much as it pains me to say this, great actors like Whoopi Goldberg and Tim Curry have very little to do, and did disappoint. Overall, it's a decent movie, it is colourful cute and fun, but does have a tendency to drag and a bit loud in places. 7/10 Bethany Cox

This movie was ok. I liked the series also. The toddlers have a bit of an accident and end up in the forest, where a big bad wolf is. So...their parents go to rescue the tots. It's ok for a kids movie but the plot is really weak. Still, it's an entertaining movie to watch but I wouldn't go and rent it. And despite going for just 79 minutes it's an animated movie so maybe thats an excuse for it and movies like it in the genre.

70%

Taking place immediately after the "Rugrats" episode "The Family Tree" where Didi finds out she's pregnant. "The Rugrats Movie" is when Tommy's new sibling is finally born. The Rugrats are very excited about Tommy's new sister, but when the baby is finally born, it's a boy. Baby Dil practically does nothing, but cry, scream, and poop. Tommy thinks he can take him back to the hospital in exchange for a new baby brother, but soon they all get lost in the woods. This is their first time in actual danger, not just their imaginations.

This is certainly not the best story for a movie, but it is okay. Baby Dil, however is very annoying. More-so in the later episodes of the show than this movie, because he constantly interrupts their adventures and makes every episode about baby-sitting Dil.

While "The Rugrats Movie" is a decent film, it has flaws.

• It's starts the downfall of a once great cartoon show.

• Like in "Pokémon: The First Movie" this film tries a little bit too hard to be darker and more dramatic than the TV show it's based on.

• There are WAY too many jokes about poop, pee and other such gross things. I'm fine with crude humor when it's in small doses (like on "Rocko's Modern Life"), or when it's actually made funny (like on "The Ren & Stimpy Show"). But this movie (and the later episodes of the show) just over-do it.

There are good things too though.

• I loved the opening sequence of the film.

• The animation is great, and perfect for the big screen.

• The voice acting is top-notch.

• Some parts were really funny. Like when they spoofed "Indiana Jones".

Overall this is a decent and mildly entertaining film. But it's certainly not one of the greatest animated movies ever. There are better movies of animated TV shows ("The Simpsons Movie"; "The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie"; "Batman: Mask of the Phantasm"), but there are also worse ones ("Aqua Teen Hunger Force: Colon Film for Theaters"; "Pokémon: The First Movie"). Funny, nicely animated, good voice acting, but a little bit too much potty jokes, and it added a horrible character to a great TV show.

Rating: 6/10 "Decent"

Rugrats: A name I had never even heard until my daughter started watching it. My son soon followed and joined sis on the couch when the familiar theme song kicked in. They are 6 and 4 now and were thrilled when they announced the movie version of their favorite show. Mom and I promised to take them. As we arrived in the theatre, there were families all over just like ours. Once the film started, however, I was 6 years old again, watching my favorite cartoons. Rugrats movie is a joy for parents and kids alike. There is adult humor (referring to the sex of the new pickles baby, one parent says "if born under venus, look for a" ...before being cut off. There is kid humor too, multiple diaper jokes, and just plain FUN! Parents, and non-parents alike owe it to themselves to see this fun movie. If you have kids, it is a joy to see their faces light up when the theme song kicks in, and Tommy squirts the screen with his bottle (just as the SDDS sound kicks in, and the title breaks on-screen)

This is a great way to spend 85 minutes, and while my 4 year old got a little restless during the forest scenes (about 1/3 of the movie), my 6-year old sat through it with nary a word. A great time for kids of all ages, and a good way for parents and kids to spend some time together.

This animated film feature of the RUGRATS is a thrill of an adventurous joyride for its fans, and has a cutest sense of humor more unique than some in this type (like the "poopie" jokes). The familiar artwork is breathtaking and fares far better than the recent DOUG in movie form. Angelica gets to steal the show like she always does, and sings a sample of Blondie's "One Way Or Another". Simply put, a great way for kids to escape the horrors of network television. As all that can be best explained, you know exactly what to predict here. The songs are nice, but they're nothing to brag about except for when the end credits scroll by.

This is a loud movie which was fun for about 40 minutes but then it just gets to be too much, too abrasive with the yelling. Do they think kids are hard-of-hearing? Are they trying to make kids deaf?

Whatever. . I guess this is geared a lot more for young kids who are used to the TV blasting away at them. For me, that loudness is okay for awhile, but it gets tiresome. In fact, the simple storyline in here goes on for too long, too. This is an 81- minute film, which is not long, but would have been far better at no m ore than 70 minutes. An hour would have been just right.

Still, on the plus side, there are plenty of interesting scenes, the colors are bright and visually attractive, the sound is very good and there are some decent subtleties as well as slapstick humor. There are things in here adults would enjoy.

The Rugrats television series is almost twenty years old, which is surprising because when one watches the episodes of the TV series the color and overall look of the show looks like a 2000 television series. Enough with that, lets discuss the film. Its what every TV show movie adaptation is. Just an extended episode of the series. Though the sequel is something that is a step in the right direction to be different from the series. With this though, it's fitting to be a full length movie because to chop this down to a thirty minute film would be impossible. Though, this is a favorable TV show adaptation in many ways.

The plot is basic, but may be complex to a kid age five or six who this is targeted for. Parents may need to explain somethings about babies after the hospital scene. Tommy, Chuckie, Phil, and Lil are our protagonists in this ride and Tommy's mother Didi is having a baby. When welcoming what was thought to be a baby girl, is now a baby boy. They go with the name Dillon Prescott Pickles and now Tommy has a baby brother.

Instead of being a nice companion he becomes a big nightmare for the whole Pickles family because Dil will not stop crying. Both parents Didi and Stu are too focused on Dil to pay attention to Tommy which is how every family gets when a new child is born. Phil, Lil, and Chuckie get tired of the crying and put Dil in the new "Reptarmobile" which Tommy's dad made in an effort to take him back to the hospital because he's "broked". Tommy does the adult thing of trying to resist, but after some odd results, the four wind up lost in the forest with no one to help them.

The movie gets heartbreaking in a few sequences and tends to squeeze a tear out of audiences. Some of the humor and references will possibly be way over young kids' heads which is basically how every kids' movie can be sometimes. Watching this for the first time in about eight years I pointed out a lot more and understood more and more of it. The question remains me for me which children's film do I like more; The Rugrats Movie or Hey Arnold: The Movie? I think Hey Arnold's film made a bit more sense than this, but still both are fine pieces of film.

This was too Nickelodeon's film film to win a Nickelodeon Kids Choice Award which I think is pretty lame. I don't think the company's film deserved to win the company's award. Thats like me patting myself on the back and giving me $100,000 for my review and giving it a "best" award. But I guess on a certain level it makes the smallest amount of sense. Either way though, this film deserves it and is still widely enjoyed by audiences today.

Starring: Elizabeth Daily, Christine Cavanaugh, Kath Soucie, Cheryl Chase, Cree Summer, Tara Strong, and Charlie Adler. Directed: Igor Kovalyov and Norton Virgien.

Why do filmmakers find it necessary to try to turn cartoons into musicals? I found the many star-studded music numbers irritating, and a poor attempt to appear "cool" to the adult viewers. The entire plot element of the train-wrecked monkeys added nothing to the film, and seemed senseless. My 7 year old son enjoyed it except for the singing. The TV show is better.

this first animated Rugrats movie is somethings kids will enjoy,but it's not something for the whole family.adults will probably find it too loud.it also isn't very funny.i found it more of a downer than anything.the odd thing is that there are many pop culture and movie references that only adults will understand.i did find it amusing how the Rugrats spoke,messing up the English language.there is a lot of action,but i still found the movie boring and tedious.there is a lesson about friendship,but they don't hit you over the head with it.i recently watched Recess:School's Out,another animated cartoon which i found was fun for the whole family.as for The Rugrats Movie,my vote is a 4/10

As a big fan of the Nickelodeon television show, "The Rugrats", I was really itching to see this when I first heard they were making a movie, and I am a teenager, too. I was there opening weekend, and lemme tell ya, you don't have to be a toddler to love animated movies. I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. There was very good animation, a good little story, upbeat and catchy songs as well as lyrics, and the action will keep the little ones entertained. ***** out of *****.

I agree along with many other people worldwide that this a fantastic and hilarious movie..............but, I believe that in some scenes they are going for cheap laughs that just turn out unsuitable for young children who watch the T.V show. It should be rated PG atleast. I give it 7 out of 10.

I believe in walking into every movie open minded. I always try my hardest to review a film that I gave the benefit of a doubt to. After all, would it be fair to allow my expectations to take over my personal liking of a movie? I don't think so. But is it really fair to expect a person like me walk into a sell out performance in which every one of the boaster seats outside the doors are occupied somewhere in the theater, which is ninety percent engrossed with crying babies, whining children, screaming juveniles and restless kids, and think for one minute I am not going to massacre this film to no end in my review? No, there isn't any thinking to the question. Sitting though "The Rugrats Movie" was like being trapped in a little dungeon in middle of an infant nursery. I was thinking to myself "HELP ME, PLEASE."

The movie is based on the Nickelodeon television series called The Rugrats, aimed at very small children. The program, which I have viewed many unfortunate times, isn't my favorite, to say the least. What it does is take a pile of elements that regard pre-schoolers and younger children, presents them on the screen and expects people to care about a bunch of one-year-olds doing baby things. For example, I once saw an episode where the "Rugrats" had to find their pacifier. Another where they experience potty training for the very first time. Are you starting to see where I'm coming from. No one cares about what's it happening to the profoundly annoying characters; the Rugrats.

The movie, which certainly has the same quality as a fifteen minute television program, not surprisingly details the lives of five babies, Tommy, Phil, Angelica, Chuckie, Will and a brand new addition to the family, Dill. They live in a small standardized town with standardized parents and a standardized dog.

One day, under the supervision of their sleeping grandfather, they decide to go on an adventure in the wilderness, which causes a bunch of boring and literally agonizing commotion that lasts and lasts and lasts…for over 80 minutes.

As bad as the story, characters and interest were in this movie, the musicals were ten times as bad. They spoofed the light rock song "One Way or Another," funk and rap melodies. The new born babies at a nursery sing, the Rugrats sing, monkeys sing, all in an array tormenting sequences that, literally, forced me to walk out and take a long visit to the bathroom.

I want to end my review by telling you that "The Rugrats Movie" is a very bad movie. Not that I have anything personal against the Rugrats themselves, but I know something depressing when I see it. I walked in to the theater with a frown on my face. I walked out in a madder of joy. Not because I enjoyed the movie, but because it was finally over with.

RUGRATS RULE! I love this movie. It's like one of my favorite cartoon movies ever. If you don't like Rugrats you are crazy. Everything about it is cool. The plot was good. The music is very cool. I recommend this movie to anyone who loves rugrats and likes cartoon movies.

This movie wasn't really bad, but it wasn't really good, either. Many parents who take their children to see this movie will be bored out of their minds! I mean I'm not saying this is the worst movie of all time, but I think whoever the writers were could do A LOT better because the series is fantastic. There was some LOL humor (i.e. the babies in the newborn room singing that song) and when Charlotte says "If born under Venus, look for a--" and gets cut off by her cellular phone. On a scale of 1-10, I rated it a 7. I will still watch the series, but I wouldn't go to see it again.

I really enjoy the Rugrats on TV. I'm into most animated cartoons but the Rugrats is something special because of its gentle yet biting take on the world.

The Rugrats Movie feels more than just an episode stretched for the screen. The addition of a new character, baby Dil, into the mix gives rise to a whole new set of interactions between Chucky, Phil and Lil, Angelica and Tommy.

However, I didn't get the same sense of awe I got from The Lion King or Antz, or the sense of humour and emotion found in Toy Story or A Bugs Life.

Those are truly great pieces of animation, The Rugrats Movie is only good.

Seeing as this was a Klasky/Csupo production, I was hoping to see a cartoon reminiscent of the Duckman TV series also produced by Klasky/Csupo. Alas, this Rugrats dribble is a far cry from the comic genius of Duckman.

To think anyone would subject their children to this sort of nonsense is beyond me. Cartoons are supposed to be funny and provocative, not just so-so animation in vivid colour or a plot that never goes beyond a really badly written episode of Lassie.

It's amazing really how long it took me to get round to seeing this all the way through. I was the generation that grew up with Rugrats, it was iconic. It often annoyed me but I kept watching nonetheless. My brother put in a good word for it as one of the less excruciating kids shows of its era since it is about infants, making all the grossness and stupidness contextually appropriate.

It was never a stupid show though and this is far from a stupid movie. It can be very lavatorial and it does irk me how the infant characters malapropize: (the "hopsicle", the "responsitivie" etc.). But this is just part of the deal and it is admittedly quite justified.

The most obvious aspect of the movie is its fascinating visualization of a world viewed from people one foot high and no frame of reference for anything. Imagery, always compelling.

Storywise it's actually got a a lot of conflict. At first it's the classic Freudian case of a child perceiving the loss of his parents to the younger sibling which then develops into a narrative of the same character trying to meet the duty that is expected of him by his family at the expense of doing right by his pre-established friends.

On a material level it's a formidable tale as well. The show frequently had the kids exploiting the unbelievable negligence of every adult they were entrusted with and wandering off alone. But here they are in the freaking forest. It's high stakes by any standard and the rugrats themselves are well aware of their own mortality. The possibility of just leaving the newborn alone to die is on the table, this picture neither lays it on too thick nor does it sugar coat the hard reality.

Angelica (you know, the evil one) has a good presence in it but thankfully does not dominate it. The adult characters are also very fleshed out with the one brother who dedicated his life to making money and the other who pursued a fulfilling career at the expense of stability. Though it is not a main focus, this and the other foolishness of the grown up pepper this talking infant movie very funnily.

I was glad they included songs but I felt cheated by they being only one original one (that didn't have parody lyrics) as good as it is (Beck is in it).

My main issue with the story is that they are stuck in the forest for most the runtime and they don't make much effort to mix up the imagery: it's just wood wood wood wood wood wood etc.

We do get some rather terrifying encounters with some wild animals (there's monkeys too just you know which are both funny and terrifying) so it's not all bad.

I'm not saying that it isn't rather excruciating and I wouldn't suggest watching it with people but you can tell that the people who made this took it really seriously and genuinely loved the characters they were working with.

I know its a movie for children, but isn't it a little bit TOO unrealistic? I mean, have you ever seen 1-2 year olds that can speak? Or that could remember any episode of "Indiana Jones"? Anyone who could drive a Godzilla ("Raptar")-Vehicle? How does it come the parents aren't already being sued when they "lost" their children? And last but not least: One baby that wouldn't starve when left in the forest alone?!?

I'm a big fan of the TV show (my younger sister never misses it; I can't help but see a few minutes of it nearly every day), and I knew eventually a big-screen version would be made. I rented it and watched it on my own one Sunday morning. Okay, so it wasn't as good as I expected, but it was still worth renting. I didn't think that the musical scenes fit well with the rest of the movie, and Angelica really didn't have enough screen time. Chuckie was, as always, an adorable coward. Tommy was the cute little leader, and Phil and Lil were as charming as ever as bickering twins. A nice new addition to the cast was Baby Dil. Seeming to be a brat, you eventually warm up to him. Many a play on words were used, which always cracked me up. Computer animation was cool. And I must admit, as pathetic as it seems, there were a few scenes where I actually cried! Rent it if you're into cartoons, but otherwise, you might want to stay away from it. 8 out of 10.

The third Nickelodeon movie, and the first based on a Nicktoon, and no better place to start than what was making Nickelodeon the big bucks back then, fair game.

The Rugrats Movie is not an amazing movie by any stretch, and it's a sore spot for longterm fans as this was the movie that introduced Dil. But in spite of that, you can honestly do far worse. As far as most movies like it go, it's more earnest in its effort. I know that doesn't sound like much, but what I mean by that is that by the end of it, the story is enjoyable, certainly well written, but not exactly groundbreaking.

But by the end of it, you can do far worse than this. If you have to watch this with your kids it won't be the end of the world, there is something to enjoy about it, whether it be the more tender moments or even the songs or dumb jokes if you have the stomach for it. Even for a nostalgic look-back it works, though your mileage may vary.

I loved this movie as a kid and I still have a spot for it, but of course it's not great. This movie walked, so Rugrats in Paris could run.

I actually kind of like the RUGRATS TV series. It's a perfect movie to watch with the kids that both of us like. So of course seeing the current RUGRATS MOVIE was a no-brainer.

No the movie is a no-brainer.

This film's 85 minute length feels like forever. They've taken the funny dialogue of the babies and changed them into a slew of "poo" and "pee" jokes.

SAMPLE SCENE: A group of babies at a hospital urinate into the air, which goes through light which creates a rainbow.

Now do you really want your children to see this movie?

It's not a total waste. A handful of jokes work and having David Spade voice a Park Ranger are major pluses. But they still can't help this movie which joins LOST IN SPACE and THE AVENGERS of good TV shows gone bad at the multiplex.