Ronin

Ronin is defined as a Japanese Samurai who has lost his master and must search for work as a sword for hire or reduced to banditry. A group of experts are gathered in Paris by Deirdre (Natascha McElhone) who is looking to steal a mysterious suitcase. The group (Robert DeNiro, Jean Reno, Stellan Skarsgård, Sean Bean, Skipp Sudduth) don't know each other and don't trust each other. The plan is very sketchy, and Deirdre won't tell them what's in the suitcase.

Director John Frankenheimer shows that he still has a bit of juice left in him. The best thing about this movie is the class of acting talents he is able to get. Robert DeNiro is superbly brilliant. Jean Reno is absolutely solid, and Sean Bean puts in a nice turn. The objective is almost unimportant. This is about a bunch of great actors playing around with some mysterious characters. Each of whom may turn out to be something less than reliable.

Ronin is a beautiful looking movie that utilizes its gritty depiction of Paris and Nice to its advantage. Watching this picture 26 years after it originally released, it paints a thoroughly nostalgic and unconventionally idyllic view of France. Laden with big leather jackets and a plethora of iconic European cars from the 90's, it is oozing with atmosphere and easily immerses you into its setting. That is by far this movie's biggest strength, along with its extremely entertaining (albeit sometimes clunky) car chase scenes.

The plot is... less great. It tells a very vague and mostly nonsensical heist story, where a group of international criminals meet up for the first time to do a job together, in a similar vein to Reservoir Dogs. The glaring difference between the two movies is that the person who's in charge of setting up the job in Ronin seems to have very little control over their hired criminals, who easily bully their handler into being given more information and money, as well as them being generally terrible at working in a group!

While the overall premise is little more than flimsy, the moment-to-moment banter between the group is decent, and the action scenes are well executed. The acting is also great in general, despite somewhat poor writing in a couple of scenes. It's a movie carried quite effortlessly by its aesthetics, to a point where you can ignore most of the plot's faults because of how easily you get immersed into the world the movie's created for itself. Ronin drags a bit towards the end, with a third segment that was not as entertaining as the rest of the movie, but it is overall a great, laidback watch.

Now THIS is what I call an action movie. Combine a brilliant cast (Robert De Niro + the underrated Jean Reno, Sean Bean amongst them) with brilliant action scenes - gun fights and car chases are both top notch here; in fact, they're some of the best that have been put on film ever, and stand the rest of time really well (watching in 2022g - with lots of exotic European locals, like Paris and Nice, and a touch of swirling intrigue thrown in for good measure and you have a really great film.

De Niro plays a no-nonsense American mercenary hired by someone shadowy to retrieve a case. He doesn't know much more than that, except the folks currently in control of it are willing to kill to keep it in their possession. Lots of sketchy actors on both sides, including Russians and Irish!

A great movie that you can't just watch with one eye. It starts slow, laying a strong foundation, and if it's on TV, it's easy to get lost by not paying attention at the beginning. However, it's an outstanding film, exploring the characters with a huge action movie in the background.

It's visually interesting and doesn't ever let you know the things you think you need to know, but by the end you've forgotten that you wanted to know them in the first place. Robert DeNiro gives a strong performance and doesn't get lost in some of the showiness he can deliver when he's making up for a weaker story, and the supporting cast is full of familiar faces, many of which blend so well into the characters they play that, again, you can become lost in the story (although this time, it a good way).

For its genre, Ronin is a good film. I don't think it's quite fair to criticize it for what it is not, such as saying that it's a poor film because there are movies out there with better car chases.

I saw it at the theatre and thought it was OK, saw it on video expecting to be more disappointed, and actually liked it better the second time.

I don't think the plot is as difficult to understand as some might claim. I had no trouble following it. Whether or not it's credible, well, how many action films are? It's credible enough for me to watch it and not say is this ever stupid. That's about all that I look for in an action film, sorry to say.

I actually enjoyed the dialogue for the most part. DeNiro and Reno in particular were solid. The film did begin to fade towards the end, especially once everyone was in the skating arena. I appreciated Frankenheimer showing as much of France as he did. That was a bonus.

So, yes, I could point to a number of flaws in Ronin. But, perhaps because of my low esteem for action films overall, I would say it's a worthwhile watch if you're an action fan, or a DeNiro fan, as I am.