फ्रांसीसी परमाणु परीक्षण एक इगुआना को एक विशाल राक्षस में विकिरणित करते हैं जो न्यूयॉर्क शहर के लिए रवाना होता है।फ्रांसीसी परमाणु परीक्षण एक इगुआना को एक विशाल राक्षस में विकिरणित करते हैं जो न्यूयॉर्क शहर के लिए रवाना होता है।फ्रांसीसी परमाणु परीक्षण एक इगुआना को एक विशाल राक्षस में विकिरणित करते हैं जो न्यूयॉर्क शहर के लिए रवाना होता है।
- पुरस्कार
- 10 जीत और कुल 13 नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Matthew Broderik and Jean Reno star in what in the industry is considered a "bomb." It cost a lot but didn't make much money. However, it would be unfair to consider this movie a bad movie. Instead one can view this English version of the relatively more cheesy 1950s Japanese "Godzilla" movies with Jurassic Park overtones as entertaining, blockbuster-like. It attempts along with Broderik's own wonderful personality to insert a fairly large dose of comic humor throughout the movie. Yet the balance between comedy, drama, and horror is more uneven than the best of these monster movies. There a bit more gore than the typical Jurassic Park movies, but not necessarily over the top considering how gory movies have become. There are also lapses in rational or logical chase scenes were Godzilla seems to speed away from helicopters but can't catch up to a speeding taxicab. The attempt to create a somewhat sympathetic monster is also intriguing though it wasn't completely successful in pulling it off. Overall, this is a feel-good action monster movie that could have been better, but it wasn't nearly as awful as the dollar numbers indicate.
Well, being a longtime fan of the GODZILLA/GOJIRA films as a youngster, I remember seeing this with great anticipation. I, unlike a lot of people, was not at all disappointed. This film was exactly what I was hoping it would be at the time. Sure, it certainly wasn't as charming or as funny as the films I loved as a kid, but it was a lot of fun. I loved the action scenes, the look of the monster was crazy to me, and the plot was simple enough for a first time viewer to get right into. Seeing it again 10 years later, I had the same reaction. My opinion of this film hasn't changed one bit. I guess everybody's complaints stem from how this has no charm or any kind of attempt at being cute or original. I guess that's understandable, but I still don't see what everybody's problem is. This was supposed to be a fun, exciting, and action packed thrill ride. That's all it is, no more, no less. I personally think that it succeeds at what it achieved to be perfectly. Matthew Broderick may not exactly be an action hero, but his character sure was quirky and funny. Jean Reno was as good as usual.
Like many people, I wasn't fond of this when it was first released. Revisiting it now nearly twenty years later I can say my opinion has changed quite a bit. It's still not a great Godzilla movie, at least not how I quantify that, but it is an enjoyable "big monster movie" on its own merits. The special effects are great, the action is pretty well staged, and the music is surprisingly nice. The only real problems for me are that the cast is a little too goofy at times (I think they were going for some kind of Jurassic Park humorous/serious blend) and the movie does run a little long. Overall, though, I think it's an entertaining movie that deserves a second look.
I dont get it guys, just because its different doesnt mean its bad, unless it actually is bad, but it isnt at all!
Sure Godzilla didnt have a ton of screentime, and he is very weaker than the previously was, but that make sense since its about the characters planning to stop him, its a movie where he is the enemy, not the one you're cheering on, speaking of which, the characters are great! I like Nick, Audrey, Philippe, everyone! I love the music in this movie too, i freaking love deeper underground! The Story is great, and so are the characters, music is amazing, horror, action, and sometimes comedy aspects are great!
Overrall, an awesome movie in my book, even a great godzilla one!
Sure Godzilla didnt have a ton of screentime, and he is very weaker than the previously was, but that make sense since its about the characters planning to stop him, its a movie where he is the enemy, not the one you're cheering on, speaking of which, the characters are great! I like Nick, Audrey, Philippe, everyone! I love the music in this movie too, i freaking love deeper underground! The Story is great, and so are the characters, music is amazing, horror, action, and sometimes comedy aspects are great!
Overrall, an awesome movie in my book, even a great godzilla one!
This movie is far from amazing, but it doesn't entirely deserve the maligning it gets. Is the pace plodding sometimes? Yes it is, especially in the middle act. Is the script weak? Yes it is rather. Is the direction unfocused? I think so, but it is Roland Emmerich, a director I never found particularly good anyway, that said I actually think it is one of his better directing jobs here. Is the acting bad? Sort of and sort of not. Matthew Broderick is very bland, and his character is poor, same with the female lead whose acting style doesn't belong but Harry Shearer is fun and Jean Reno is surprisingly dignified.
I did love the idea of Godzilla though. There may be the odd hole here and there, but thanks to a quite riveting final half hour especially it remains interesting. The scenery is splendid, the editing is good enough, some sequences are entertaining and Godzilla while different is very well designed. The score is also memorable. And while there are flaws to Godzilla, I couldn't help being entertained. This film isn't Emmerich's best, but contrary to what others might say I don't think it is his worst either. Overall, it has a lot of problems, but I kind of liked it. 6/10 Bethany Cox
I did love the idea of Godzilla though. There may be the odd hole here and there, but thanks to a quite riveting final half hour especially it remains interesting. The scenery is splendid, the editing is good enough, some sequences are entertaining and Godzilla while different is very well designed. The score is also memorable. And while there are flaws to Godzilla, I couldn't help being entertained. This film isn't Emmerich's best, but contrary to what others might say I don't think it is his worst either. Overall, it has a lot of problems, but I kind of liked it. 6/10 Bethany Cox
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThis movie features more Simpson voice actors than any other project besides The Simpsons (1989) itself: Hank Azaria, Harry Shearer and Nancy Cartwright. When the Simpsons later did a Godzilla parody called Homerzilla, they referenced that "Homerzilla" received a Hollywood remake that failed, a jab at this movie. The episode ends stating that Homerzilla will one day return just as soon as that "Zilla" film is forgotten.
- गूफ़Based on the width and depth of the Hudson River, it would be impossible for a Los Angeles Submarine to navigate submerged, let alone make high speed turns.
- भाव
Apache Pilot: [after accidentally hitting the Chrysler Building with a missile, blowing the roof off of it] Aw, damn, uh... That is a negative impact. I repeat, that is a negative impact.
Radio Technician #3: Negative impact, sir.
Mayor Ebert: [shocked] Negative impact? That's the goddamned Chrysler Building we're talking about here.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटA dedication to Godzilla creator Tomoyuki Tanaka appears towards the end of the credits.
- कनेक्शनEdited into अमेरिका में एन्जिल्स (2003)
- साउंडट्रैकHeroes
Written by David Bowie & Brian Eno
Produced by Andrew Slater
Performed by The Wallflowers
Courtesy of Interscope Records
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Godzilla?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
- Where in the movie do those songs in the soundtrack play?
- How was this film received in Japan?
- Does Godzilla use the Atomic Breath in this movie?
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Godzilla
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $13,00,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $13,63,14,294
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $4,40,47,541
- 24 मई 1998
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $37,90,14,294
- चलने की अवधि2 घंटे 19 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें