Belorusskiy vokzal

Moscow, the Soviet Union. Summer of 1956 - eleven years after Hitler Nazis were defeated and buried. Four red army veterans met again at another comrade's funeral. Aleksei, a writer. Viktor, a factory boss. Nikolai, an accountant. And Ivan, a mechanic. All graying and coping with post war life as best as they could. After the funeral, Nikolai invited his friends to go to his place. They experienced quite a few unexpected adventures on their way, including a bit of time in police custody...and ended up getting another comrade involved in the unplanned reunion. Reference of Belorusskiy Railway Station doesn't happen until the last minute of the film. That's where the victorious soldiers returned from war in the Spring of 1945. All actors were the age of real WWII veterans. The film was shot in 1969, so they appeared to be a bit older than their characters supposed to be. But they gave top notch performance. All four leading male actors are dead now, none of them reached the age 70. Aleksei Glazyrin who played Viktor passed away no long after the movie was released.

For a long time, the Soviet Union liked to pretend that after the victory in World War II, the long-longed-for socialist paradise had been achieved. Not everything is perfect, but surely people who have gone through the hell of the Eastern Front, comparatively unscathed, are the most valued people in the Union. Andrey Smirnov tries to contest this convention.

Moreover, he had a lot of trouble making this movie. He was already a controversial director on the verge of being blacklisted, so when he picked up a script that inferred not everything was peachy for veterans, a lot of eyebrows were raised.

The story is in itself about these four different men, who really wouldn't be seen with each other if not for the shared experience of war. After all, there is no stronger bond than a soldier's bond. Alongside them trying to reconnect after burying their commander, they are now observing how the lives around them are moving on and the values of the next generation being in complete conflict with theirs. You immediately detect that, over 25 years later, none of them moved on, almost as if the lives they lead are simply epilogues and their true selves are evermore stuck in the 41-45s. Of course, all of that conundrum is silent, because that generation is any if not idyllic representation of stoicism. The sacrifice that they made they would repeat in the heartbeat for the next generation, but the window into their unperturbed melancholy is all the more interesting for that.

I've heard few good words about this movie. Finally I was able to sea it on Russian TV yesterday. I think the story is quite interesting - few veterans of WW II meet at the funeral of their comrade and fellow veteran. I would say there is several fine things about "Vokzal" - very good actors, nice cinematography, good music ... , but in my opinion is too nostalgic sometimes, quite overdone. The last part when they all sleep in one room, in small apartment is certainly overdone, although it gives us good idea about living conditions in USSR in early 1970s. There are several better Russian/Soviet films about WW II ("The cranes are flying", "Ballad of a soldier", etc.). The best of "Vokzal" is Bulat Okhudzava song "Nam nushna odna pobeda".

This film is about war veterans, how Russian life wears them out much too quickly and their attempts to cope with it, sticking to memories and old friendship. (Not to mention drinking vast quantities of vodka but that's something to be expected.)

After the enormous accomplishment of winning the war against a very determined and better prepared enemy, Russians finally lost the peace - - this is something we all know by now. But in 1971 it was not foreseen by most people, so this is quite surprising to see, how clearly "Belorussian Railway Station" knew and has shown it all. It depicts quite clearly, how doomed the Soviet economy was, due to the unbelievable levels of incompetence among leaders (big and small) and a very inflexible bureaucracy, powers even war heroes could not overcome.

Well, this is old news and "Vokzal" is very slow, even by 1970s standard. But if you have the necessary patience and you can enjoy a theatrical play, it is worth seeing once for the great acting. All the five protagonists are very good, although Safonov is strangely underused. (The other three males are characterized in detail, therefore I feel he should have been, too. I really wonder why his personal background is missing, was that part censored or simply cut out because the film turned out to be too long?) Leonov is clearly the best, as usual, and Nina Urgant managed to be unforgettable, lovely and very authentic, although her role was kind of auxiliary, her character less elaborate than the others.

The film missed, in my opinion, some opportunities: more Okudzhava songs, for example. (He wrote some great ones about soldiers not finding their places in peace.) And there is a view, a dangerous tunnel with rotting pipes under a peacefully sleeping housing estate, that could have been much more memorable, highly symbolic and maybe even one of the great moments of cinema, if cinematography would have been great and not only adequate.