Kristin Lavransdatter
- 1995
- 3 घं
IMDb रेटिंग
4.5/10
1.1 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंKristin, a medieval Norwegian noblewoman, grows up expecting an arranged marriage. She falls in love with knight Erlend despite social boundaries. Their affair causes scandal and political u... सभी पढ़ेंKristin, a medieval Norwegian noblewoman, grows up expecting an arranged marriage. She falls in love with knight Erlend despite social boundaries. Their affair causes scandal and political upheaval before her father permits their marriage.Kristin, a medieval Norwegian noblewoman, grows up expecting an arranged marriage. She falls in love with knight Erlend despite social boundaries. Their affair causes scandal and political upheaval before her father permits their marriage.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 2 नामांकन
Jørgen Langhelle
- Simon Darre
- (as Jørgen Sandvik Langhelle)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I really like this film more each time I view it.
One of the rare films I know which takes their time to tell the story ... NO MTV-cut-style-frantic-cutting but lovingly dwelling on faces, persons, landscape etc.
Yes, maybe some of the costumes aren't 100% correct, maybe some parts of the soundtrack do irritate with their loudness, but that to me are minor flaws!
I really think they captured the "big picture" of Kristin's early life and her getting to know Erlend Nikulausson perfectly - in tone at least, even if some smaller episodes of course are missing from the film. And even the odd additions here and there I think do make sense in the context of the film!
I just hope there WILL someday be someone who with equal skill and pacing takes the other two novels to the silver screen too!
In short: one of my favorite films right now!
One of the rare films I know which takes their time to tell the story ... NO MTV-cut-style-frantic-cutting but lovingly dwelling on faces, persons, landscape etc.
Yes, maybe some of the costumes aren't 100% correct, maybe some parts of the soundtrack do irritate with their loudness, but that to me are minor flaws!
I really think they captured the "big picture" of Kristin's early life and her getting to know Erlend Nikulausson perfectly - in tone at least, even if some smaller episodes of course are missing from the film. And even the odd additions here and there I think do make sense in the context of the film!
I just hope there WILL someday be someone who with equal skill and pacing takes the other two novels to the silver screen too!
In short: one of my favorite films right now!
I always wondered if anyone could do justice to Undset's great trilogy.
Liv Uhlman brings us the flavor of medieval Norway, where Christianity still battles older forces and beliefs. She gives us a radiant but guilt-ridden Kristin not far off the mark from the character in Undset's books.
The architectural details, costumes and various artifacts around the farm seem just right for the era.
I felt disappointed when the film ended as I was eager to see the subsequent development of Kristin's character we see in the second and third volumes of Undset's trilogy. One can only hope that these, too, will come in time.
Liv Uhlman brings us the flavor of medieval Norway, where Christianity still battles older forces and beliefs. She gives us a radiant but guilt-ridden Kristin not far off the mark from the character in Undset's books.
The architectural details, costumes and various artifacts around the farm seem just right for the era.
I felt disappointed when the film ended as I was eager to see the subsequent development of Kristin's character we see in the second and third volumes of Undset's trilogy. One can only hope that these, too, will come in time.
I did not read Undset's great book trilogy about 14th century Norway. This is Liv Ullmann's second directorial attempt. She was best known for her acting roles in Ingmar Bergman's films. It is a film about medieval spirituality both paganism & Christianity. The production of the film is lavish film with epic type dimensions & cinematography. It is a long move 3 hours. Kristin is the daughter of a prominent landowner in medieval Norway. She grows up in total harmony with the ideals of the time: strong family ties, social pride & devout Christianity. She accepts the fact that her father has arranged for her to marry the son of another landowner. Kristin's beauty & purity create violent emotions around her. There are envy & attempted rape, murder & revenge. She seeks refuge from the world in a convent, waiting the time for her marriage. Here the passion of her life strikes, the knight Erlend Nikulaussonn. He, an accomplished seducer, also falls hopelessly in love. They have to cross not only convent walls to meet, but social boundaries as well. Their love cannot be kept secret, & suddenly the innocent Kristin is the centre of a scandal. Her fiancé withdraws from their engagement, her father rages, & Erlend's former mistress tries to poison her. The affair grows into a political issue, & finally some of the country's most dignified leaders persuade Lavrans to give in. The lovers win each other, but it is in front of a charred altar in a burnt down church, & their happiness has a double edge. The film is a cinematic masterpiece. Ullmann has learned well from her teacher Ingmar Bergman & this is a really magical beautiful 14th century tale. Every scene is a pleasure to behold thanks to SVEN NYKVIST's cinematography. This DVD contained the full 3 hours & contained the 20 minutes omitted from the original film release. Some will say that Ullmann ultimately doesn't succeed in bringing Kristin's passion to life on screen in a convincing fashion. I disagree I loved this film
If I had seen this film before reading the book first, I still would not have liked it very much. However, as I had read the book, I cannot write this review without comparing the two.
Compared to the book, this film was horrible. Not merely because the pace was slow, or because of the pointless changes they made to the plot in places.
No, what ruined it for me was the choice of actors. There is not a one, I think, who completely fit their character, but more so for the main characters. Take Kristin, for example; in the book, she is, at the oldest, about 18. And yet the actress looked 28. Kristin is described as being incredibly beautiful; and yet, the actress was, if not directly ugly, certainly not pretty or attractive in any way. Kristin is supposed to be sweet, innocent and mild of manner--in every way the epitome of the the gentle young virgin. And yet I saw few such characteristics in the way the actress portrayed her.
And Erlend. Erlend was supposed to be handsome, dashing, sweeping her off her feet. The very Romeo to her Juliet. The actor looked retarded half of the time, his mouth hanging open; the other half was nothing special.
And then there are the pointless changes in the other characters. Kristin's bedmate, Ingebjørg (and she was the ONLY bedmate...Helga was very little involved with anything in the book) was supposed to be blonde and very fat. Kristin's father was supposed to be very fair and knightly. Likewise, her almost-fiancé was supposed to be plump and talkative, too. And her sister was supposed to be about 6 years her younger; NOT the same age.
Possibly petty complaints: but actors make the film. Choose actors that cannot play their part, and you have a bad film. It's as simple as that. If you want to adapt a book to the screen, please do so as accurately as possible. Truth be told, I couldn't make myself watch the last half an hour of the film, it was annoying me so much. In the book, in liked Kristin; I had sympathy for her cause. In the film, I did not, at all.
Compared to the book, this film was horrible. Not merely because the pace was slow, or because of the pointless changes they made to the plot in places.
No, what ruined it for me was the choice of actors. There is not a one, I think, who completely fit their character, but more so for the main characters. Take Kristin, for example; in the book, she is, at the oldest, about 18. And yet the actress looked 28. Kristin is described as being incredibly beautiful; and yet, the actress was, if not directly ugly, certainly not pretty or attractive in any way. Kristin is supposed to be sweet, innocent and mild of manner--in every way the epitome of the the gentle young virgin. And yet I saw few such characteristics in the way the actress portrayed her.
And Erlend. Erlend was supposed to be handsome, dashing, sweeping her off her feet. The very Romeo to her Juliet. The actor looked retarded half of the time, his mouth hanging open; the other half was nothing special.
And then there are the pointless changes in the other characters. Kristin's bedmate, Ingebjørg (and she was the ONLY bedmate...Helga was very little involved with anything in the book) was supposed to be blonde and very fat. Kristin's father was supposed to be very fair and knightly. Likewise, her almost-fiancé was supposed to be plump and talkative, too. And her sister was supposed to be about 6 years her younger; NOT the same age.
Possibly petty complaints: but actors make the film. Choose actors that cannot play their part, and you have a bad film. It's as simple as that. If you want to adapt a book to the screen, please do so as accurately as possible. Truth be told, I couldn't make myself watch the last half an hour of the film, it was annoying me so much. In the book, in liked Kristin; I had sympathy for her cause. In the film, I did not, at all.
Even though I did like this movie I do have to sympathize with those people who thought the film a bit long and boring. The shooting style is fairly straight forward, and there really aren't too many memorable dramatic shots, but overall it's technically a respectable film.
I think one of the things that holds back a better film, and I really hate myself for saying this because I usually say the opposite, is that the leads needed younger actors for the parts they were playing, and the narrative needed to be tightened up a bit.
The look of the film is okay, but I think a selection of longer lenses and a more static shooting style might have better sold the artistic period quality of the film. There's a couple of hand held shots that seem somewhat awkward and clumsy, and I didn't get too much romantic tension between the two leads.
Otherwise it's a very fine looking film, but it lacks a certain energy largely because of the kind of story that it is. Medieval romances typically conjure knights wining the hands of fair ladies with deeds brave and bold; read that as killing a few other knights in combat. But there isn't a whole lot of derring do on anybodies part. Oh well.
It's not a film I'd recommend unless you're into the medieval genre. And even then don't expect any sword play, nor much in the way of any plot as it's essentially the reflections of single woman up until her "big moments".
Still, there's a certain charm and a lot of production value in terms of sets, costumes and even locations went into the creation of this film. Again, if you're into the medieval genre, then maybe give it a glance for those qualities alone, but again it is a slower film.
See it once, and see what you think.
I think one of the things that holds back a better film, and I really hate myself for saying this because I usually say the opposite, is that the leads needed younger actors for the parts they were playing, and the narrative needed to be tightened up a bit.
The look of the film is okay, but I think a selection of longer lenses and a more static shooting style might have better sold the artistic period quality of the film. There's a couple of hand held shots that seem somewhat awkward and clumsy, and I didn't get too much romantic tension between the two leads.
Otherwise it's a very fine looking film, but it lacks a certain energy largely because of the kind of story that it is. Medieval romances typically conjure knights wining the hands of fair ladies with deeds brave and bold; read that as killing a few other knights in combat. But there isn't a whole lot of derring do on anybodies part. Oh well.
It's not a film I'd recommend unless you're into the medieval genre. And even then don't expect any sword play, nor much in the way of any plot as it's essentially the reflections of single woman up until her "big moments".
Still, there's a certain charm and a lot of production value in terms of sets, costumes and even locations went into the creation of this film. Again, if you're into the medieval genre, then maybe give it a glance for those qualities alone, but again it is a slower film.
See it once, and see what you think.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThe Norwegian entry to the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film in 1996.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनThe film premiered in the United States at a length of 144 minutes. The original length was 187 minutes. A restored version was released to video in North America, with all the cut footage intact.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Liv Ullmann scener fra et liv (1997)
- साउंडट्रैकO Domina Nostra
Composed by Henryk Mikolaj Górecki
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Kristin Lavransdatter?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें