अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंAntonia is a cute drug addict in London, who meets a nice motorbike courier. They get caught between a corrupt drug cop and a drug dealer.Antonia is a cute drug addict in London, who meets a nice motorbike courier. They get caught between a corrupt drug cop and a drug dealer.Antonia is a cute drug addict in London, who meets a nice motorbike courier. They get caught between a corrupt drug cop and a drug dealer.
Christopher Adamson
- Max Quinlan
- (as Chris Adamson)
Jason Dors Lake
- Natty
- (as Jason Lake)
Alan Freeman
- Disc Jockey
- (as Alan 'Fluff' Freeman)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Liz hurley 5/10... mostly for her bod joss ackland 8/10 ... Good acting everyone else ... pretty forgettable... Strange twisted plot to emphasise the "decadence" of the upper class .. who even despise the QUEEN!. Yes, cockneys, toffs and a bit of rough... Burke and Hare ... semi-gay drug lords... RIGHTEOUS justice (no mention of Alan titchmarsh tho). It's all here with colorful red buses and lovely old country houses. Shame about the plot and the acting. Erotic? no!
You keep thinking that the cliches will stop, that someone will show some emotion, that an English word besides 'f...k' will be used to describe something.....but no, no, NO!! You are condemning yourself to a monumental waste of time if you think things will get any better.
The plot is so confusing, and then it becomes not even worth the bother to sort out. Maybe Elisabeth Hurley was playing a stony-faced, no-emotion, no-care druggy; or maybe....she CAN'T ACT!!! Whichever, even the coupling scenes (it would be an insult to call them 'love scenes') are amateurish. You don't even care about the torture scenes. Glad I couldn't recognize Claire Bloom...she was probably glad, herself.
The lighting is haphazard, the dialogue hardly comprehendible. I wasted $10 on this dog....mad, it was not. Boring, it most definitely was.
The plot is so confusing, and then it becomes not even worth the bother to sort out. Maybe Elisabeth Hurley was playing a stony-faced, no-emotion, no-care druggy; or maybe....she CAN'T ACT!!! Whichever, even the coupling scenes (it would be an insult to call them 'love scenes') are amateurish. You don't even care about the torture scenes. Glad I couldn't recognize Claire Bloom...she was probably glad, herself.
The lighting is haphazard, the dialogue hardly comprehendible. I wasted $10 on this dog....mad, it was not. Boring, it most definitely was.
This film is worth seeing simply for its monumental crapness. In the first half an hour alone countless unsympathetic characters are introduced, some of whom proceed to perform random and inexplicable actions throughout. The plot is so disjointed and badly conceived, it requires considerable effort to maintain any idea of what's going on. Not that there's any reason to do so. Instead, viewers should marvel at some appallingly bad dialogue, a staggeringly inept piece of acting from Liz Hurley, and one of the most incomprehensible plotlines I've ever come across in a film. Worth watching, simply because it is SO bad.
Mad Dogs starts off well-A police raid of a local drug store, but after the first half an hour, it becomes incredibly boring. It focuses on the romance between a hard ass American biker and a lonely druggy.
No-one really deserves any real recognition for this, but Jock Ackland is probably better than the rest. Elizabeth Hurley is patchy. In some scenes she does well, but in others you wonder why she is such a big success.
Despite a decent beginning and a good ending, this is nothing compared to other British films like Trainspotting, The Full Monty and Face. Rating=2/5
No-one really deserves any real recognition for this, but Jock Ackland is probably better than the rest. Elizabeth Hurley is patchy. In some scenes she does well, but in others you wonder why she is such a big success.
Despite a decent beginning and a good ending, this is nothing compared to other British films like Trainspotting, The Full Monty and Face. Rating=2/5
I saw this a VERY long time ago, when Elizabeth Hurley and Hugh Grant were cresting on their mid-1990s power couple wave (and just before Hugh became unstuck in his personal life) after the impact of 'Four Weddings' and a certain Versace dress. Liz suffered her share indignities for this movie, appearing topless on the side of VHS box for one (!), as well as being catapulted into the pages of numerous 'lads mags' on the strength of it, but it was their breakthrough that ensured that this otherwise long forgotten project had any sort of profile at all.
I'd like to think that somewhere the one shot writer may have had in mind some kind of romance - crime drama like 'Mona Lisa' but the screenplay is a shouty , incomprehensible mess of coincidences, contrivences and craziness. Most of the characters are unlikeable, although given that most are upper class junkies that should come as no surprise.
Yes, Liz is in sparklingly wooden form for a long term drug abuser but I'd argue that Elizabeth Taylor in her prime would have had an uphill battle with this material. That even the great Joss Ackland and C Thomas Howell struggle to deliver acceptable performances suggests that Hurley was perhaps being judged perhaps a little too harshly.
Only Jeremy Brett, the quintessential Sherlock Holmes, and a fine classical actor in his own right, soars far above the swamp of mediocrity. That he and Ackland both disassociated themselves from what would be Brett's final movie is a sad testament to a performer who undoubtably deserved a better epithet.
Mind you, it's always worth remembering that this is how fame was often achieved in the days of pre-social media and instant successes - a long apprenticeship of hard graft, obscurity and appearances clunkers like this.
I'd like to think that somewhere the one shot writer may have had in mind some kind of romance - crime drama like 'Mona Lisa' but the screenplay is a shouty , incomprehensible mess of coincidences, contrivences and craziness. Most of the characters are unlikeable, although given that most are upper class junkies that should come as no surprise.
Yes, Liz is in sparklingly wooden form for a long term drug abuser but I'd argue that Elizabeth Taylor in her prime would have had an uphill battle with this material. That even the great Joss Ackland and C Thomas Howell struggle to deliver acceptable performances suggests that Hurley was perhaps being judged perhaps a little too harshly.
Only Jeremy Brett, the quintessential Sherlock Holmes, and a fine classical actor in his own right, soars far above the swamp of mediocrity. That he and Ackland both disassociated themselves from what would be Brett's final movie is a sad testament to a performer who undoubtably deserved a better epithet.
Mind you, it's always worth remembering that this is how fame was often achieved in the days of pre-social media and instant successes - a long apprenticeship of hard graft, obscurity and appearances clunkers like this.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाJoss Ackland has called the film "god-awful and quite rightly torn to shreds".
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Mad Dogs and Englishmen?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Shameless
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
टॉप गैप
By what name was Mad Dogs and Englishmen (1995) officially released in Canada in English?
जवाब