MacGyver: Lost Treasure of Atlantis

I'm actually watching this right now. It's on BBC1 at lunchtime on a Sunday, and it is ideal fair for a lazy Sunday afternoon. Forget the comparisons to India Jones - it's a TV movie, it isn't supposed to be oscar quality, or even quality that you'd pay money for. If you liked MacGyver at all, you'll know what to expect, and you'll like this. Nuff said.

While searching for artefacts relating to the lost city of Atlantis MacGyver and Professor Atticus uncover a lost amulet that holds the key to the location of the lost ark which contains the flame of Atlantis. Looking for more funding Atticus is laughed out of town and strikes out alone with MacGyver's help. They uncover the ark but the theft of the amulet reveals that they are up against Lord Cyril Cleeve who seeks the treasure for himself to add to his riches and get him into the history books.

I watched the TV show in the mid/late 80's and was a regular viewer on Saturday evening here in the UK. However I cannot remember whether it was any good or not (I was maybe 12 when I watched it). However the name was enough to tempt me back to watch this TVM one lazy Sunday afternoon. If the series was as good as this movie then I can only assume that I had nothing better to do with my Saturday evenings back when I was younger!

The film is every inch a TV movie. There is little of quality and much that is cheap or mediocre. The plot is clearly inspired by the Indiana Jones video game where he searches for Atlantis, however it has better effects than this. The story doesn't always make sense and MacGyver's devices to help them are just ludicrous. The worst one is where they escape from a crater by using steam to fire a funnel (with a rope attached) up over the crater edge. The (plastic) funnel not only manages to stick on the crater edge but also supports their weight! This is the one that sticks in my mind but nothing really makes sense if you think about it.

The script is pretty poor but there are actually large sections of the film with little dialogue so we're spared apart from every other scene where the characters recap the plot for those of us not bright enough to keep up. The cheapness of the film can be seen in the sets. Most of the special sets are very plastic looking. Some of the locations (a volcano & the Balkans) look like a quarry and a disused industrial estate respectively. When the film does get a good location (the stately home) the film stock makes it look cheap.

The action is poor mainly due to MacGyver's stupid devices. However even car chases where MacGyver clings to the windshield lack any sort of tension – in fact that one looks like he been strapped to the front of a car as someone slowly drives it round London! There is one good twist in the middle that took me by surprise but the film never builds on it and actually manages to diffuse whatever tension was injected within 5 minutes of the twist occurring.

The cast are laughably poor. Anderson is still stuck in the 1980's with his mullet hairdo. He never convinces in the lead and has the look of a man who is waiting for someone to take control of the film – he is more suited to a good series than films I think. Blessed is having fun (and I'm glad someone did) but is very out of place. His booming voice and high spirits don't fit in at all and it occasionally feels like he's taking the p*ss. Burgress as the bad guy is woefully toothless and the only face of interest is McCormick who is more well known for his role in Casualty.

Overall this is a poor reflection on how I spent my time as a pre-teen. A real poor quality product that aspires to be an Indiana-Jones-on-a-budget film but never even manages to get to that standard of film. Not awful – but just really poor, you'll forget you saw it 10 minutes after you switch it off.

This is an adventure featuring MacGyver's high-minded mentor, played by the great Brian Blessed.

Remember the Jupiter Effect? When the planets aligned in the 1990s all heck was supposed to break loose. But they didn't really align and the books and videos about the Jupiter Effect have gone on the rubbish heap with books on Y2K and 2012. Fear mongering really looks stupid in retrospect. It'll happen with Global Warming one day (when I was in school we were fearmongered into believing we were barreling into the next Ice Age; that changed on a dime and now sounds quite quaint. And now all the teachers of the next Ice Age ate dead and I alone have escaped to tell thee.

Too, the Greek word for fear is Phobos.

Still, exciting novels and movies have been made out of worse nonsense, so this Raiders of the Lost Ark knock off (More Roger Corman than Spielberg) is fun and exciting with several places for MacGyver to show his ingenuity to make something out of nothing. But he's not the man he was when the series started.

It actually has pretty good effects for a TV budget. Though the planets are never that big nor so perfectly aligned.

TV movies aren't exactly known for subtlety or a delicate hand in their execution; what of a TV movie based on a long-running series that, to at least some degree, was known for cleverness and detail? As it turns out, not even Angus MacGyver can shimmy his way out of the standards of the medium. The pacing is rather swift, and the dialogue and scene writing are sometimes downright lazy or sloppy, whether heavy-handed (such as shoehorning in lines about then-current events in the Balkans, or an excruciatingly ham-handed ending), clichéd, or otherwise. Above all, the writing prioritizes that every scene and every little facet of the plot should align Just So such that MacGyver and his friends can continue on their adventure, but do so with very specific, sometimes arbitrary stakes. Some broad strokes of the narrative are a bit predictable; characters might shift moods two or three times within one scene to match the needs of the forthright storytelling; some particular choices in the dialogue can only inspire skepticism. Even the story at large, clearly asking Richard Dean Anderson to all but don the whip, jacket, and fedora of Indiana Jones, plainly borrows from the blockbuster action-adventure franchise, including the appearance of a certain artifact, a character's motivations, a plot point or two, and the mannerisms that Brian Blessed adopts as Atticus (hello, Henry Jones, Sr.).

None of this is to say that 'MacGyver: Lost treasure of Atlantis' is inherently bad, or that it's not at all fun. It's well made, emphatically including production design, art direction, props, effects, and stunts. Michael Vejar's direction is quite fine, and David Geddes' cinematography; I like Ken Harrison's score. There are, still, flashes of minor brilliance at one point or another as the tale progresses. It's just that the series starring Anderson was nothing if not original and actively engaging, as the protagonist's keen wit was tested under various circumstances; even at its best, this TV movie feels all too imitative as the hockey-loving, mullet-wearing crafter of thingamabobs is thrust into a quasi-fantastical journey, even embracing pseudoscience for the sake of its plot. The "MacGyverisms" we quickly came to love in the series, improvised solutions, are present in some measure. Yet these are generally deemphasized in favor of half-hearted advancement of the story, and small moments that feel all too contrived - pure coincidences to get them out of a situation with something that is at the characters' disposal when there is no reason for it to be. With all this having been said, I think the cast do the very best they can with the material, and sometimes the performances are quite solid; on the other hand, there are definitely times, too, when the actors seem to be straining to be genuine.

I think what it really comes down to is that the screenplay needed to be developed a bit more to weave in more believable dialogue and scene writing. Even if it meant extending the runtime, maybe some scenes could have been added, or others simply built out, to bolster the plot development. And more than anything else: look, I love MacGyver, but this feature comes across as something that was written, greenlit, and ready to go as a standalone TV movie, in no way related to the character we know and love. I might be wrong, but it really seems like the protagonist was written in purely as an effort to cash in on the popularity of the series, or perhaps nostalgia for a series that by that time had run its course a few years prior. True, maybe there's nothing inherently wrong about this, either. The fact remains that save for Anderson's involvement, there's nothing about 'Lost treasure of Atlantis' to meaningfully connect it with 'MacGyver,' which accentuates to me that in the very least this isn't special even in the eyes of those who ordered it, and that it might have been rushed. Now, again, I believe this is well done more than not, and passably entertaining. Even if you're a diehard fan of the series, Anderson, Blessed, or someone else involved, however, I just don't think there's enough here to warrant going out of your way for it. Save 'Lost treasure of Atlantis' for a lazy day, when a "decent" film is good enough for suit your needs, and let's leave it at that.

As a fan of Stargate SG-1, I watched MacGyver to see Richard Dean Anderson. The character of MacGyver is very similar to his current character in Stargate, Colonel Jack O'Neill. He has the same sense of humour,same characteristics and the same attitude towards people. In fact the only difference that I noticed was that Mac is a whole lot smarter than O'Neill. ( More along the lines of the IQ of Major Carter than O'Neill.) Examples of this are that the dialogue was so predictable in parts for anyone who watches Stargate. Maybe it's just me but that's my opinion.