[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro

Doctor Who

  • टीवी फ़िल्म
  • 1996
  • TV-14
  • 1 घं 29 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
6.3/10
11 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
Eric Roberts, Paul McGann, Daphne Ashbrook, and Yee Jee Tso in Doctor Who (1996)
Space Sci-FiTime TravelAdventureDramaSci-Fi

अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंThe newly-regenerated Doctor takes on the Master on the turn of the millennium, 31 December 1999.The newly-regenerated Doctor takes on the Master on the turn of the millennium, 31 December 1999.The newly-regenerated Doctor takes on the Master on the turn of the millennium, 31 December 1999.

  • निर्देशक
    • Geoffrey Sax
  • लेखक
    • Matthew Jacobs
    • Sydney Newman
    • Donald Wilson
  • स्टार
    • Paul McGann
    • Eric Roberts
    • Daphne Ashbrook
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    6.3/10
    11 हज़ार
    आपकी रेटिंग
    • निर्देशक
      • Geoffrey Sax
    • लेखक
      • Matthew Jacobs
      • Sydney Newman
      • Donald Wilson
    • स्टार
      • Paul McGann
      • Eric Roberts
      • Daphne Ashbrook
    • 137यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 27आलोचक समीक्षाएं
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
    • पुरस्कार
      • 1 जीत और कुल 1 नामांकन

    फ़ोटो44

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    + 37
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार21

    बदलाव करें
    Paul McGann
    Paul McGann
    • The Doctor
    Eric Roberts
    Eric Roberts
    • The Master…
    Daphne Ashbrook
    Daphne Ashbrook
    • Dr. Grace Holloway
    Sylvester McCoy
    Sylvester McCoy
    • The Doctor
    Yee Jee Tso
    Yee Jee Tso
    • Chang Lee
    John Novak
    John Novak
    • Salinger
    Michael David Simms
    Michael David Simms
    • Swift
    Catherine Lough Haggquist
    Catherine Lough Haggquist
    • Wheeler
    • (as Catherine Lough)
    Dolores Drake
    Dolores Drake
    • Curtis
    Will Sasso
    Will Sasso
    • Pete
    • (as William Sasso)
    Jeremy Radick
    Jeremy Radick
    • Gareth
    Eliza Roberts
    Eliza Roberts
    • Miranda
    Bill Croft
    Bill Croft
    • Motorcycle Policeman
    David Hurtubise
    • Professor Wagg
    • (as Dave Hurtubise)
    Joel Wirkkunen
    • Ted
    Dee Jay Jackson
    • Security Guard
    Gordon Tipple
    Gordon Tipple
    • The Old Master
    Mi-Jung Lee
    • News Anchor
    • निर्देशक
      • Geoffrey Sax
    • लेखक
      • Matthew Jacobs
      • Sydney Newman
      • Donald Wilson
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं137

    6.311K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    7JeffG.

    A wonderful (if brief) return!

    The only bad thing I can think about the Doctor Who TV movie is that it didn't become a new series. Paul McGann did an excellent job as the Doctor. Hopefully, he'll get another chance to play the role again someday. Loved the new TARDIS console room as well. The movie did a fine job in appealing to both long-time Doctor Who fans and people unfamiliar with the show.
    7dr_foreman

    never plays the same way twice!

    This is one of the most over-analyzed pieces of television ever produced. "Doctor Who" fans are such a dedicated bunch that they'll buy camcorders and film their own episodes when the show is not in production; it stands to reason that they'd pick apart the only "official" new episode produced for TV in the 1990s, but the chorus of their dissenting voices sometimes really grates on me. Thanks to all the controversy, I still can't honestly say what I think of this movie, even all these years later; every time I see it, I have a different opinion.

    I'm not on board with some of the usual criticisms. I don't care about the romance (it barely features), and I don't really mind that the Doctor is half-human (it's a side issue that doesn't alter the plot, hardly worth complaining about). What I do dislike is the fast-paced, action-oriented nature of the story, which prevents character development (Chang Lee is the chief offender here) and doesn't allow any room for the Doctor to act like a detective (which is his usual schtick).

    Still, good effects, a rockin' music score and some nice arty camera work elevate this far above the average TV production. Perhaps the only thing that really matters is that it's entertaining; why analyze it beyond that? The only real problem here is that the original series is, generally speaking, even more entertaining, but that's one tough act to follow!

    An ex-roommate and good buddy of mine perhaps summed it up best: "That was fun, but could you put on a cheesy one now? They're more interesting." I bet her opinion of it wouldn't change on a second viewing; I, alas, am afflicted with the curse of fandom!
    Daggernow

    Not as big a disaster as some of the reviews say it is.

    This attempted pilot for a new Doctor Who series may have faults but I think some of the criticism is off-base. The original Doctor Who series was never a slave to realism or it's own continuity the way shows like Star Trek or The X-Files were. It was more like a long-running comic strip with it's light "who cares about obsessive fan-boys and fan-girls" approach. This show always played fast and loose with it's own continuity and often contradicted what had gone before for the sake of the present story being aired. So many fans went bananas over things like the Doctor being half-human and the Eye of Harmony being on board the Tardis and the Master being able to slither around in that black snake form to find a new host body or why he was put on trial by the Daleks. For a show that always pretty much made it up as it went along that's a waste of time. I've got some random thoughts to throw out about this attempt to revive the series.

    As for the Doctor being half-human I'll repeat my remark about this show making it up as it went along. From what I recall the show was on the air for years before it even established that he was a Time Lord so a sudden revelation about a half-human heritage isn't as way out as it first seems.

    My view on the Master being able to slither around in snake form is also to repeat that this show was never a slave to it's own continuity. I'd like every Dr Who fan who can't sleep at night fretting over this bit to explain to me what the White Form in the story where Tom Baker regenerated into Peter Davison was and why the other regeneration scenes took place without such a White Form "merging" with the Doctor.

    As for why the Eye of Harmony was on board the Tardis I'll say that if a new Doctor Who series had resulted from this pilot movie they could have done a flashback story at some point featuring Sylvester McCoy's Doctor and explained all that.

    I thought the Master being put on trial by the Daleks was kind of cool - sort of like they were saying "This guy is so evil even the Daleks are outraged!" If a new series had resulted they could have done another Sylvester McCoy flashback story at some point to explain what led up to the Master being put on trial by the Daleks. Maybe he tried to take over Skaro and turn all the Daleks into his own personal hit-squad or some other nonsense.

    Sylvester McCoy was pretty cool for agreeing to appear in this movie to give the potential new Doctor Who series a legitimate link to the original British show. The poor guy had to come in with a lame regeneration scene and went out the same way and the effort was for nothing since the show's own fans turned up their noses at this film and the new series was never given a chance. A new Doctor Who series that didn't live up to the continuity geeks' vision of the show would have been better than no Doctor Who series at all. Just another example of the down-side to cult shows.
    Rabbit-7

    HERE's why the Brits hate us!

    Whenever anyone talked about the possibility of America doing "Dr. Who" (especially after BBC cancelled the show), people would joke, "Oh, right! They'd add car chases and gun fights and the Doctor would fool around with his companions!" Then they'd have a hearty laugh at these stereotypes of Hollywood, confident that they were being sarcastic and, if it ever DID happen, certainly people involved with the show would try to preserve the sensibilities of the series. That'll show 'em for over-estimating the intelligence of our media! I think America should revive the Lend-Lease Act, providing funding for any future movies but letting the Brits actually make them. In turn, the BBC should file for a gun law exemption so they can shoot any Fox producer trying to visit the set.
    keenan-1

    Oh, dear.

    The summary says it all: Oh, dear.

    I don't particularly like it when Hollywood attempts to "glamourize" an existing phenomenon in order to rope in lots and lots of new viewers (to make money, of course, what other reason can there be?) but I've grown to accept the fact that it's an established part of the entertainment business. I approached this movie with what I hoped was an open mind, and I was even slightly intrigued by the first five minutes or so of the movie...

    This changed, of course, when suddenly stuff started blowing up, pointless FX started popping up all over the place, and the scriptwriters apparently forgot that they were writing for DOCTOR WHO and seemed to think that they were employed by Chris Carter and the X-FILES, as they started a direct rip-off of the black oil creature, which is suddenly all that's left of the Master. (That this flies in the face of all previous background established by a show that had run for over twenty-five years is only to be expected; after all, it was only a cheesy little British sci-fi show and everyone KNOWS that Hollywood knows best, after all!) I was left with my mouth hanging open, aghast at the mess to which I was being subjected.

    Paul McGann tried. God, how he tried. I can almost see him as the Doctor if I squint. This has nothing to do with the man's acting ability, which is superb, nor does it have to do with his comparatively young age--he was about the same age as Peter Davison was when he took over the role, after all. I just could not believe in a Doctor who was playing second fiddle to a completely new and fictitious TARDIS--say, last time I looked, wasn't the Eye of Harmony something to do with Rassilon back on Gallifrey?

    Let us mercifully pass over the spectacle of the Doctor's first on-screen kiss--except to say that if he was never tempted by some of the companions in his past (particularly Romana, who at least was of the same species!) then why the heck would he be tempted by some jittery Earth woman who didn't particularly like him?

    Please, o scriptwriter, if you're going to use characters and equipment that have been established over a quarter of a century, does it not make sense to have some passing familiarity with what you are writing? Or am I being ridiculous?

    Never mind. At least I still have access to all of the videos of the classic episodes. Be sure that this travesty is one that I have zero interest in acquiring. If you're a fan of the television series, avoid this movie or spend the duration of it weeping for the mess they've made of DOCTOR WHO. If you've never seen the series and are a big fan of on-screen stuff that is really special effects in search of a movie, well, this will be right up your alley. Just don't subject a true fan to this nightmare, please.

    इस तरह के और

    Doctor Who: The Night of the Doctor
    9.0
    Doctor Who: The Night of the Doctor
    डॉक्टर हू
    6.2
    डॉक्टर हू
    Doctor Who
    8.5
    Doctor Who
    Doctor Who: Time Crash
    8.4
    Doctor Who: Time Crash
    Doctor Who: The Eighth Doctor Adventures
    8.0
    Doctor Who: The Eighth Doctor Adventures
    Torchwood
    7.7
    Torchwood
    An Adventure in Space and Time
    8.2
    An Adventure in Space and Time
    Doctor Who: Tales of the TARDIS
    7.5
    Doctor Who: Tales of the TARDIS
    Dr. Who and the Daleks
    5.6
    Dr. Who and the Daleks
    Doctor Who: Unleashed
    6.3
    Doctor Who: Unleashed
    Class
    6.8
    Class
    K-9 and Company
    6.0
    K-9 and Company

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      The UK television broadcast ended with a dedication to Jon Pertwee, the third actor to play The Doctor in Doctor Who (1963) (and one of the most popular), who had died a week earlier.
    • गूफ़
      Despite losing all of the possessions that were on his person after being checked into the hospital, The Doctor still produces his trademark bag of jelly babies twice. Where did they come from?
    • भाव

      The Doctor: Wait, I remember. I'm with my father, we're lying back in the grass, it's a warm Gallifreyan night...

      Grace: Gallifreyan?

      The Doctor: Gallifrey. Yes, this must be where I live. Now where is that?

      Grace: I've never heard of it. What do you remember?

      The Doctor: A meteor storm. The sky above us was dancing with lights. Purple, green, brilliant yellow. Yes!

      Grace: What?

      The Doctor: These shoes. They fit perfectly!

    • क्रेज़ी क्रेडिट
      The UK television broadcast ended with a dedication to Jon Pertwee, the third actor to play the Doctor in Doctor Who (1963) (and one of the most popular), who had died a week earlier.
    • इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जन
      The version broadcast and released on video by the BBC in 1996 had the following cuts (totalling 1 min 6 secs):
      • The caption "Based on the original series broadcast by the BBC" is removed, although no footage is edited.
      • Chang Lee's gang firing at the departing car.
      • Chang Lee's two friends being shot.
      • The third and fourth gunmen aiming at Chang Lee.
      • The gunmen firing at the TARDIS.
      • The operating scene is heavily edited with many cuts of Grace and her attempts to retrieve the probe from the Doctor's body. The sound of the Doctor's final scream was also removed.
      • A closeup of Chang Lee's neck being twisted and the sound of Bruce's wife's neck snapping. These cuts were waived for the 2001 DVD release.
    • कनेक्शन
      Edited into Comic Relief: Doctor Who - The Curse of Fatal Death (1999)
    • साउंडट्रैक
      In A Dream (I Called Out Your Name)
      Written by Barbara L. Jordan and William Peterkin

      Performed by Pat Hodges

      Courtesy of Heavy Hitters Music

      Played on a grammophone when the Doctor is sitting in the lounge of his Tardis, just before the Master escaped

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल2

    • Is this Dr Who movie definitively linked to both the 1963 and 2005 Dr Who series?
    • Is Paul McGann and his role as the 8th Doctor considered Canon?

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 25 सितंबर 2004 (भारत)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
      • यूनाइटेड किंगडम
    • आधिकारिक साइट
      • Official site (United Kingdom)
    • भाषा
      • अंग्रेज़ी
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • Doctor Who: The Movie
    • फ़िल्माने की जगहें
      • 1988 Odgen Avenue, वैंकूवर, ब्रिटिश कोलंबिया, कनाडा(Grace's house)
    • उत्पादन कंपनियां
      • Universal Television
      • BBC Worldwide
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    बॉक्स ऑफ़िस

    बदलाव करें
    • बजट
      • $50,00,000(अनुमानित)
    IMDbPro पर बॉक्स ऑफ़िस की विस्तार में जानकारी देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      1 घंटा 29 मिनट
    • रंग
      • Color
    • ध्वनि मिश्रण
      • Dolby
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 1.33 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    Eric Roberts, Paul McGann, Daphne Ashbrook, and Yee Jee Tso in Doctor Who (1996)
    टॉप गैप
    By what name was Doctor Who (1996) officially released in Canada in English?
    जवाब
    • और अंतराल देखें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.