Gulliver's Travels

Gulliver's Travels (1996) - I remember seeing this film for the first time back when it was released as a two part TV special and I remember being awed by it and inspired by its brilliance.

It's such a clever and witty story that has been made with justice and a plethora of big names and equally good smaller names too.

There is a shiny and colourful quality to it that is joyful and incredibly entertaining. For years I have been waiting to see it repeated on TV or to find it on DVD, which I finally did. I am so pleased to finally have it to watch whenever I like, because it is a film that you can see over and over and not get bored of.

It also breaks down in to five small segments covering not just Gulliver's trip to Lilliput, but his other travels as well, the only version of this story to do so.

To think that the book that this film was based on was written in 1726 is extraordinary, as it is such a fantastic tale full of outrageous and hilarious characters. Perhaps a lot of that has been added by the film, I don't know as I haven't read the book just yet, but if so, then all the better for their ingenuity to bring the tale to a new audience.

I love the way that the story is edited together and overlaps in to "Reality", it shows Lemuel's return to England at the beginning of the film and through his ravings at the sanatorium we find out where he has been and the great adventures he has had.

Despite the chronology jumping around in this way, it was still incredibly easy to follow and actually helped to move the story forward.

The cast is outstanding, with too many acknowledgements to be made for this short review and despite Ted not being British, like all the others and, as far as we know, the character he is portraying, he actually played his part exceedingly well, especially when you consider that my only other references to him are 'Cheers' (1982-93) and '3 Men And A Baby/Little Lady' (1987/1990).

The humour is simple and inoffensive, while the story explores more complex issues such as the misunderstanding of Mental Health issues and their treatments, or lack there of in the 18th Century.

It also looks at forms of government and how bizarre they may seem to an outsider. The author, Jonathan Swift, must surely have been mocking the British Government with what he wrote. He seems to also be saying that we should be more tolerant and accepting of other cultures and races, because our institutions may seem just as queer to them as theirs do to us.

He puts our society and cultures in to question by observing it from the perspective of other species, other laws and regimes.

As such it is full of Morals, ethics and important messages for the viewer to take on board and I believe that it would be a valuable and enjoyable watch for any age.

I may actually have to get on a boat and try to find my way to Brobdingnag, as it sounds like a haven compared to the fumbling rules and laws of the Britain I currently live in. If only I didn't suffer so badly with sea sickness.

Even the special effects were good for the time that this film was made, although I didn't like the wasp bit, close up bugs freak me out.

Thoroughly enjoyable and unrivalled in its telling. As the only version to tell the whole story, it is a charming fantasy tale, ideal for all the family on a bank holiday weekend and easy to pause for toilet and snack breaks.

921.11/1000.

This is an exceptional adaptadation of the book. An all-star cast which gives merit and worthwhile to the tv-film and Danson in his best performance yet as a sailor who becomes lost at sea, only to return some years later a different man - a man who has learnt alot of humanity in his journey's and a man casted as insane.

Throughout the movie you don't know whether Danson's character is sane or not. The amazing effects and direction make it a marvel to watch. The all-star cast enjoy their roles to the hilt.

The sequences within the asylum are disturbing, as are Danson's twisted hatred on humans, and what they have become. And in some aspects the thought-provoking stories that Gulliver went through can still be adapted today.

For example the "we drink when we are not thirsty and eat when we are not hungry" is a typically haunting line. The social commentary which underlines the novel and indeed this film can still be used and adapted today.

This is a thought-provoking, well made TV-film that is very enjoyable, and I recommend you watch it.

My Rating: 8/10

We all know bits and pieces of Gulliver's travels. Tiny people, yeah, sure. Liliputians. Giants too, some of us may recall. Some might remember the word yahoo comes from here. That's were it stops for most people.

Swift's book is omnipresent in school libraries. That's were i first read it, and there's were a lot of people read it for the last time. It is treacherously lightly written, like many of the old adventure books. Children can read it. Still, it's dripping with satire, black and uncompromising. That's something I think most screen writers forget when they adapt this movie.

This movie remembers, however. Our hero, Ted Danson, gives a credible and serious performance as the world-adjusted man who's thrown to mysterious countries so like our own. Gulliver's travels criticizes everything. Theists, scientists, government, commonfolk, ethnicity, humanity itself. Few are spared, and most of the satire is just as fresh today.

While very faithful to the story, the movie also dares adding new angles, all which work very well. The screen writer deserves all credit for managing to balance so well between time and activity(it's not boring, that is).

Production values are way beyond a TV movie. With some marketing this movie would have done well at the box office. All of the fantastic worlds Gulliver visits are well-made, explained in detail and often very funny, much like Swift's book.

Actors are all pros, since this is a British production. Mary Steenburgen stands out, along with James Fox's Dr. Bates, the chillingly cruel doctor who, much like nurse Ratched, only wants the patient's best.

So, a modest proposal, if you ever get the chance to get this movie, do so. It's a real treat.

Swift's writing really has more in common with Kafka and Orwell than with fantasy-adventure writers, so it's curious that Gulliver's Travels has been deemed a children's novel. Lucky kiddies!

The same applies to this movie. There have been some really awful versions of this story, which must be why people are reluctant to look at this version. I mean, it's a TV-movie and it comes from muppetteer Jim Henson, so how should we expect anything but cuteness?

Look again - beauty turns up in the oddest places. Children love this movie enough to sit through all three hours of it, but it also takes the time to get Swift's dark vision right. I hate special effects, but here they are used to carry the story forward instead of just dazzling us. Please note that the producers took the trouble to recruit classical actors like John Gielgud and Peter O'Toole who perform their eccentric roles with perfection.

Dramatically, the romance between Gulliver and Glumdalclitch is rendered touching and poignant, as well as funny (she's a little girl, but twenty times his size). The frame-story has a theme about absent fathers that many children will relate to. And the part about Gulliver in the asylum introduces an element of horror dealing with the abuse of authority (apparently deriving from Val Lewton's "Bedlam" [1946], another forgotten masterpiece).

The VHS is always turning up in the bargain-bin for a few cents, which is an insult to the many great artists who put this thing together. I encourage audiences to recognize a good thing by getting this movie and inspiring others to watch it. Although it has a lot to offer children, grown-ups will find that it stands up nicely to such classics as Aguirre, Brazil, 1984 and other serious fantastic works.

Much of it was filmed in Portugal, I was looking up the various palaces involved-

Sintra-

-Monserrate(Laputa) -Queluz(Brobdingnag) -Ribafria Palace (Sorcerer's Palace, I think) -Castle of the Moors(Struldbrugs)

Lisbon-

-Ajuda(Burning Palace, Lilliput)

Mafra-

-Royal Palace and streetscapes (Lilliput) -Sea Cliffs (Brobdingnag and Lilliput)

The Doctor's Mansion is obviously in the Cotswold limestone district... anyone recognize it?

The final shot is modelled after the Paul Nash painting "Landscape from a Dream", surrealism seems right for a movie like this.

www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/nash-landscape-from- a-dream-n05667

I guess I have to write something here, although I think my one summary says it all. I'm not a huge Ted Danson fan... nothing against the man, just hasn't "done it" for me. This covers the sides of Swift's novel that were never covered before. You can tell the cast was having a wonderful time filming this.