[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
IMDbPro

What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?

  • टीवी फ़िल्म
  • 1991
  • 1 घं 33 मि
IMDb रेटिंग
5.7/10
1 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
Vanessa Redgrave and Lynn Redgrave in What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1991)
ड्रामाथ्रिलर

अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंAn elderly, bedridden former movie star is "cared for" by her sister, who hates her and keeps her a virtual prisoner in the family mansion.An elderly, bedridden former movie star is "cared for" by her sister, who hates her and keeps her a virtual prisoner in the family mansion.An elderly, bedridden former movie star is "cared for" by her sister, who hates her and keeps her a virtual prisoner in the family mansion.

  • निर्देशक
    • David Greene
  • लेखक
    • Henry Farrell
    • Brian Taggert
  • स्टार
    • Vanessa Redgrave
    • Lynn Redgrave
    • Bruce A. Young
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDb रेटिंग
    5.7/10
    1 हज़ार
    आपकी रेटिंग
    • निर्देशक
      • David Greene
    • लेखक
      • Henry Farrell
      • Brian Taggert
    • स्टार
      • Vanessa Redgrave
      • Lynn Redgrave
      • Bruce A. Young
    • 26यूज़र समीक्षाएं
    • 1आलोचक समीक्षा
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • IMDbPro पर प्रोडक्शन की जानकारी देखें
  • फ़ोटो34

    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    पोस्टर देखें
    + 28
    पोस्टर देखें

    टॉप कलाकार21

    बदलाव करें
    Vanessa Redgrave
    Vanessa Redgrave
    • Blanche Hudson
    Lynn Redgrave
    Lynn Redgrave
    • Jane Hudson
    Bruce A. Young
    Bruce A. Young
    • Dominick
    Amy Steel
    Amy Steel
    • Connie Trotter
    John Scott Clough
    John Scott Clough
    • Frank
    John Glover
    John Glover
    • Billy Korn
    Samantha Ryan
    Samantha Ryan
    • Baby Jane
    • (as Samantha Jordon)
    Erinn Canavan
    • Blanche at 9
    J. Michael Flynn
    J. Michael Flynn
    • Mr. Hudson
    Alexandra Johnson
    • Cora
    Bradley Mott
    • Luther
    Vinny Argiro
    • Abe
    Pat Skipper
    Pat Skipper
    • Director
    Barry Dennen
    Barry Dennen
    • Stage Manager
    Beans Morocco
    • Drag Queen
    Scotch Byerley
    • Ice Cream Man
    Tari Tabakin
    • Bank Teller
    Art Chudabala
    Art Chudabala
    • Usher
    • निर्देशक
      • David Greene
    • लेखक
      • Henry Farrell
      • Brian Taggert
    • सभी कास्ट और क्रू
    • IMDbPro में प्रोडक्शन, बॉक्स ऑफिस और बहुत कुछ

    उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं26

    5.71K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं

    TelevisionJunkie

    Interesting. . .but unsatisfying

    My philosophy on remakes is if you can't outdo the original, why bother? Although there are several remakes that I like, this is one of those "why bother" films. Don't get me wrong, the cast did a decent job with what they had to work with, and it was interesting to see the characters moved into the ‘90s, but where the original had a little too much backstory this version didn't have enough. But allowing time for commercials took away from the story, leaving this version nearly an hour short of the original. It was interesting to see the characters moved into a world with video stores, prostitutes, and drag queens -- which may be the only saving grace for the remake.

    I saw this version when it premiered, but didn't yet know the original, thus I didn't care for it that much. Seeing it again over 10 years later, now that I've seen the Davis/Crawford version, it made me like this one slightly better, but only slightly. The original is deservedly a classic, and the behind-the-scenes story is just as, if not more, interesting as the movie itself. When it comes to this version, there were no behind-the-scenes battles, being as the leads are real-life sisters.

    At the beginning of this version, the Redgrave sisters seem to be more friendly towards one another than Davis and Crawford were at any point of the original, but it still works. Lynn does a descent job as over-the-top Baby Jane, but she only plays it over-the-top, unlike the schizophrenic portrayal that Davis gave. Vanessa, on the other hand, lacked the depth that Crawford had as Blanche, which made her seem less like a victim and more like she just can't act, particularly the closer it got to the end of the film. Case in point, the final scene. Where Crawford gave an honest, breathless confession on the beach, Vanessa Redgrave studders her way through the dialogue as if she's reading it from cue cards perched above her head. John Glover, taking over the Victor Buono role, did a good job with his part, though it was a little disconcerting seeing the character in drag (though Buono could have never pulled that off).

    At the very most, this version was interesting. ‘Nuff said.
    4HazelShade

    What Has Happened to the Redgraves?!

    Oh, golly, Ladies!! WHY??

    I just....I am SO sorry!

    (Kudos to the house, though, reprising it's classic role. You've still got it, kid!)
    6annette-pulliam

    Why?

    Watchable but unnecessary remake. A vanity project I assume. And a chance for the Redgrave sisters to work together. Missing the suspense of the original.
    Michael_Elliott

    Painfully Dull and Bland

    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane? (1991)

    * 1/2 (out of 4)

    Remake of the 1962 cult classic has Lynn Redgrave taking over the role of Jane Hudson from Betty Davis while Vanessa Redgrave takes over the role of Blanche, originally played by Joan Crawford.

    There's really no point in going through the plot description because I'm pretty sure you already know if if you've seen the original. If you haven't seen the original then I'd recommend you stop reading this and go do so. While I found the original film to be flawed in certain aspects, there's no question that it was a classic thanks in large part to the wonderful lead performances. I'm very much pro-remakes as I think they can often be quite interesting in the new things they bring to something that is familiar.

    With that said, this remake just doesn't work for a number of reasons. The biggest problem I had with the film was the fact that it was incredibly dull. I mean, there wasn't a single ounce of life to be found in this thing as the movie gets off to a very slow start and it just becomes more and more dull as it moves along. Director David Greene doesn't bring any sort of life, tension or atmosphere to the picture and I'd argue that everything that worked in the original film is pretty much watered down here.

    Another major issue is the fact that there's just no tension between the sisters. There's not a single frame where you really feel for the Blanche character because her torments just aren't all that shocking and they contain minimum impact. It doesn't help that both characters are extremely dull here and that's especially true for Baby Jane. Trying to match what Davis did would be impossible but Redgrave just doesn't do anything with the part.

    I enjoy made-for-television films but this one here falls into some pretty bland traps through. In case you've missed it, I've used the word bland and dull throughout this review. WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE? has a couple interesting changes including the reason behind Jane's mental breakdown throughout the film. I also liked some of the updated stuff including Blache becoming "known" again thanks to VHS. With that said, turning Jane into a pop star was just painfully bad.
    bfjrnski

    Not bad in itself...but no remake of a classic!

    "whatever happened to Baby Jane?" remains a stunning,horrific story well ahead of it's time (1962) Joan Crawford and Bette Davis left memorable & nightmarish examples of how to play a role for all it will get you! However, it's 1991 remake with the lovely and talented Redgrave sisters promised to leave viewers with the same creepy chills & thrills! Unfortunately, this simply dosen't happen here!

    Don't get me wrong! The 1991 version of "Whatever happened to Baby Jane?" holds up as it's own story: set in modern-day Hollywood with it's all-too-familiar band of groupies,druggies,drag-queens & has-beens,who will forever lurk in the video stores and back streets, hoping to meet aging or ailing celebrities in order to "break-in" to the big-time! This TV movie actually draws the viewer in to a modern version of a hybrid between "Sunset Boulevard" and "Midnight Cowboy"

    But, in deference to it's original.I must confess that as the ailing,aging Blanche, Vanessa Redgrave manages to hand in an adequate if not wooded portrayal.AS the nutty Jane,Lynn tries her best to NOT imitate Bette Davis and it does work-at least her portrayal is more remorseful and concerned about her crippled sister! In THIS version we actually FEEL for poor Jane as she's led to believe that SHE had caused the accident! When she finally learns the truth she actually seems to have been "set free" from 20 years of guilt,depressionn & alcoholism! Of course,it's too late now,we realize, as we watch the police chase her on the beach in the final shot!

    इस तरह के और

    Aunt Mary
    7.3
    Aunt Mary
    Hollywood Dreams & Nightmares: The Robert Englund Story
    7.6
    Hollywood Dreams & Nightmares: The Robert Englund Story
    Hush...Hush, Sweet Charlotte
    7.5
    Hush...Hush, Sweet Charlotte
    Strait-Jacket
    6.8
    Strait-Jacket
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?
    8.0
    What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?
    On Golden Pond
    7.6
    On Golden Pond
    Whatever Happened to Baby Jane: Bette and Joan: Blind Ambition
    7.6
    Whatever Happened to Baby Jane: Bette and Joan: Blind Ambition
    Dead Calm
    6.8
    Dead Calm
    The Surrender
    5.4
    The Surrender
    Evil Under the Sun
    7.0
    Evil Under the Sun
    Ghost Stories
    6.4
    Ghost Stories
    RiffTrax Presents: Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?
    7.3
    RiffTrax Presents: Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?

    कहानी

    बदलाव करें

    क्या आपको पता है

    बदलाव करें
    • ट्रिविया
      The film omits the segment in which Blanche is depicted as a full-fledged Hollywood star, as well as the accident sequence, which is discussed but not shown.
    • कनेक्शन
      Referenced in The Nanny: The Yummy Mummy (1999)
    • साउंडट्रैक
      Tomorrow Is Not Far Away
      Written by Lawrence E. Finegold

    टॉप पसंद

    रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
    साइन इन करें

    विवरण

    बदलाव करें
    • रिलीज़ की तारीख़
      • 17 फ़रवरी 1991 (यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स)
    • कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
      • यूनाइटेड स्टेट्स
    • भाषा
      • अंग्रेज़ी
    • इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
      • What Ever Happened to...?
    • उत्पादन कंपनियां
      • Steve White Productions
      • Aldrich Group
      • Spectacor Films
    • IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें

    तकनीकी विशेषताएं

    बदलाव करें
    • चलने की अवधि
      • 1 घं 33 मि(93 min)
    • रंग
      • Color
    • ध्वनि मिश्रण
      • Stereo
    • पक्ष अनुपात
      • 1.33 : 1

    इस पेज में योगदान दें

    किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें
    • योगदान करने के बारे में और जानें
    पेज में बदलाव करें

    एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

    हाल ही में देखे गए

    कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
    सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    Android और iOS के लिए
    IMDb ऐप पाएँ
    • सहायता
    • साइट इंडेक्स
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
    • प्रेस रूम
    • विज्ञापन
    • नौकरियाँ
    • उपयोग की शर्तें
    • गोपनीयता नीति
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.