Philadelphia Experiment II

The movie is not terrible but it is boring and has nothing special. Time paradoxes have been done before and the Nazis winning the war one has been done way too many times. Something else could have been done but sequels suck anyway. This just has nothing going for it.

When I saw the movie I enjoyed it. I think it was done well and overall it was a good movie, but I was a little disappointed when they didn't use the same actors for the lead part as was in the first movie. It would have made more sense because it is basically a continuation of the story.

Philadelphia Experiment II (1993)

** (out of 4)

Sequel to the 1984 cult classic has David (Brad Johnson) living with his son in current day 1993. What he doesn't know is that the government is trying a new experiment and when they start it they end up sending David to a new time. The new setting is still 1993 but it's fifty years after Germany defeated the world and times are certainly a lot different. David ends up joining forces with some rebels and they try to correct history. There's a fairly good movie located somewhere inside PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT II but sadly the budget just isn't there and the execution is also all over the place and in the end we're left with a film that doesn't work and one that will mostly likely frustrate you because they weren't able to make it work. The first forty-five minutes or so are actually fairly entertaining as everything in the story is getting set up. We learn about what David has been up to since the previous movie and they set up his lifestyle and situation very well. Once the actual accident happens we're introduced to an excellent idea: what would the U.S. be like if they lost WWII? There are so many great ideas that could have come from this but sadly the second portion of the film pretty much falls apart as the brain is turned off and we're just given a bunch of silly action scenes that all come across incredibly cheap. The problem with the low budget is that it really hurts these action scenes because none of them feel as if they're really happening. The big, "epic" battle just looks tame and it's really hard to believe that you're in this war-torn environment when everything just looks like a bad "B" movie. I think there's a great story to be found in this film but the execution just isn't here so one really hopes that another film, with a bigger budget and with more wiggle room with the screenplay, will come along. Performances are what you'd expect from a film like this with Johnson doing a decent job. I can't imagine fans of the first film would enjoy this since there's no one from that previous film connected to this one.

I've watched all three of the Philadelphia Experiment movies recently. This one is a worthy installment. The story line is interesting, which keeps it afloat. The big issue with all three movies would be the direction and the production values. None of them are bad movies, but they're poorly made and it shows. The direction seems poor and the performances suffer. Had these been in line, this and the other films in the series would have faired far better.

This is so underrated. It's well-directed plus it has a decent story and much better acting than I expected. In Fact, I'd say overall it's much better than THE PHILADELPHIA EXPERIMENT.The people involved in the making of this movie should be praised for this effort.