Gross Misconduct

It has been some time since I last saw this movie but what struck me, at the time I first saw it, and still now, was the over-all artistic quality. Set in my home-town of Melbourne, it is one of the rare pieces that actually shows this town as I know it.

Locations aside, this is the first movie I'd seen Naomi Watts in, and her talent shone through brilliantly. A difficult role for her, I'm sure, but she rose to the challenge :) Certainly a memorable performance.

Jimmy's inclusion is definitely something I give a standing-ovation to the casting directors for! You couldn't pick a better actor for this role. Jimmy is just simply made for roles like this!

Stunning and moving, plot-twists abound, quietly riveting from one minute to the next. I recommend this movie for anyone wanting quality viewing.

I gave this movie a 7. I would have given it a 9 but a couple scenes of full nudity were not needed at all! That was disappointing to say the least. Great film work and the acting was very good! I thought that this was one of Smits' best roles. He was amazing. Especially the scene where the students wrote on his chalk board! That was incredible!

Although I watched it until the part where the police found her at a bus stop shaking, I thought it was sort of inappropriate for TBS Superstation to play and start it at around 10:30 PM. Young children may still have been watching it and in some places it showed the full female body, behind a very see thru shower curtain. Not appropriate unless starting at 1-2am

The story of the film is an interesting one that we've heard before, but that's not a problem--all films work like that. Well, most of them do, atleast. It looks as tho this film was made with a very small budget, which might actually be the case, and it takes away from it a lot. There are some sexually explicit scenes in the film, one of the most revealing being when the female lead is in the shower, and there's a full frontal shot of her nude. On that subject, what did that have to do with the story? Why was it necessary to add that scene? Especially at those angles (starting from her breasts, suddenly cutting to shots of her crotch).....makes no sense. This is a poorly put together movie, and it shows. The look of the film is somewhat shady in my opinion, and the way it's pulled off, I didn't find it very believable. Could have been much better. 5/10.

Justin Thorne (Jimmy Smits) is an American working as a college professor in Australia. One of his students, Jennifer Carter (Naomi Watts), works for him as a babysitter and keeps flirting with him.

This is an Australian film. It has a bit of Fatal Attraction but it comes without the bunny. The constant changes in Jennifer feels artificial. She's almost doing different characters. While I understand it, I don't like it. Does he have to play the sax? The movie is doing some cringey stuff. The sax really bugs me. It's a ham-fisted way to heighten Jimmy Smits' sex appeal and makes this cheap 90's cheese. Trust me. The man does not need more sex appeal. It does have Naomi Watts doing the softest of erotica which only adds to the movie's B-movie feel. It's 90's late night cable fare. The second half has a boring court case. It's basically an erotic B-movie with A-list stars.