IMDb रेटिंग
6.0/10
22 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA teenage girl and her father discover alien clones are replacing humans on a remote U.S. military base in Alabama.A teenage girl and her father discover alien clones are replacing humans on a remote U.S. military base in Alabama.A teenage girl and her father discover alien clones are replacing humans on a remote U.S. military base in Alabama.
- पुरस्कार
- 6 कुल नामांकन
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
In this remake of a classic, they used Bad Lieutenant and King of New York director Abel Ferrara, and cast the young beauty Gabrielle Anwar (The Librarian: Return to King Solomon's Mines) and "thirthsomething" Terry Kinney in the leads.
Kinney went on to do The Laramie Project later and was fantastic.
If you want conformity, then setting your movie on a military installation ensures that you have an easier time of it. Younger people will love this version, but just updating to modern techniques and special effects doesn't always make for a better picture.
Skintastic Moment: Great view of Gabrielle Anwar's ta-tas waking up on a stretcher.
Kinney went on to do The Laramie Project later and was fantastic.
If you want conformity, then setting your movie on a military installation ensures that you have an easier time of it. Younger people will love this version, but just updating to modern techniques and special effects doesn't always make for a better picture.
Skintastic Moment: Great view of Gabrielle Anwar's ta-tas waking up on a stretcher.
Abel Ferrara is a talented and interesting director. He's made some great films ("bad lieutenant", "china girl") and he always seems to bring out the best in his actors. With "Body Snatchers", Ferrara tackles the task of directing a big budget, studio sci-fi film. And for the most part, he succeeds. Ferrara injects the film with tight closeups and experiments with tilted and off balanced framing. Making the viewer feel like something in the film is off and eschewed. But the film just isn't that exciting. It's more of a slow burner. It never really lives up to it's own potential sadly. But the effects are solid and some of the semi-transformation scenes are disturbing.
The acting for the most part is solid with Meg Tilly giving the best monologue in the film. Gabrielle Anwar is gorgeous to stare at and Billy Wirth (Lost Boys) plays the chopper pilot hero. It could have been a better film, but "Body Snatchers" is entertaining, well-acted, and often creepy. I'm always surprised that an independent director like Ferrara was the guy chosen to helm such a big budget studio film...
The acting for the most part is solid with Meg Tilly giving the best monologue in the film. Gabrielle Anwar is gorgeous to stare at and Billy Wirth (Lost Boys) plays the chopper pilot hero. It could have been a better film, but "Body Snatchers" is entertaining, well-acted, and often creepy. I'm always surprised that an independent director like Ferrara was the guy chosen to helm such a big budget studio film...
"Body Snatchers" is a good film by Abel Ferrara, a worthy version of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" by Jack Finney, of course without being better than the 1978 version. This 1993 version has a good script but what is taken slowly, suspense is absent for much of the film, the characters and their loss of individuality by being supplanted is a gloomy idea but in the film it is executed in an uninteresting way. The performances are good, especially from Meg Tilly and Christine Elise. A great positive point of "Body Snatchers" is the special effects, which appear in few scenes but are well done and with good gore. "Body Snatchers" isn't the best movie based on Finney's work, but it's worthy and well-produced.
The Malone family move to a military base to help contain a toxic spill. Many of the soldiers and families are behaving strangely but is it the toxins or something more sinister?
I'm not a fan of remakes, many try to just copy the success of other films while some lift the original scene for scene to poor effect. However this at least tries to do something slightly different with it by setting it in a military base and bringing the drama into the family setting. In fact this setting creates some of the best scenes my favourite being where Carol tells her daughter Marti that `there's no one like you left'. The greater effects are good but really I preferred the paranoid tension of the 50's original rather than the horror of effects.
However I still think this is a very workable horror from a good director. Of course it suffers with comparison with the original that's because the original is a sci-fi classic. But as it's own film it is pretty good. Indeed the ending is what director Siegel intended but he was forced into having a more hopeful epilogue ending. Naturally it has it's weaknesses the effects overpower the story at times but really I found this to be enjoyable as a horror.
The cast are one of the weak links. I love Kinney because I'm a big Oz (HBO) fan, but here he doesn't really make a mark. Tilly has all the good lines and she is actually quite good. Anwar is also very watchable. But Ermey is type cast in his usual military role and Whitaker is far too calm and reasoned to do the job he needed to be more like McCarthy in the original.
Overall, this should be watched and not compared. In it's own right it is a good horror with only a few weaknesses that spoil it slightly. And if you do want to compare it to the 50's version then please remember than this is the type of ending that Siegel wanted and to me is one of the strengths of this film.
I'm not a fan of remakes, many try to just copy the success of other films while some lift the original scene for scene to poor effect. However this at least tries to do something slightly different with it by setting it in a military base and bringing the drama into the family setting. In fact this setting creates some of the best scenes my favourite being where Carol tells her daughter Marti that `there's no one like you left'. The greater effects are good but really I preferred the paranoid tension of the 50's original rather than the horror of effects.
However I still think this is a very workable horror from a good director. Of course it suffers with comparison with the original that's because the original is a sci-fi classic. But as it's own film it is pretty good. Indeed the ending is what director Siegel intended but he was forced into having a more hopeful epilogue ending. Naturally it has it's weaknesses the effects overpower the story at times but really I found this to be enjoyable as a horror.
The cast are one of the weak links. I love Kinney because I'm a big Oz (HBO) fan, but here he doesn't really make a mark. Tilly has all the good lines and she is actually quite good. Anwar is also very watchable. But Ermey is type cast in his usual military role and Whitaker is far too calm and reasoned to do the job he needed to be more like McCarthy in the original.
Overall, this should be watched and not compared. In it's own right it is a good horror with only a few weaknesses that spoil it slightly. And if you do want to compare it to the 50's version then please remember than this is the type of ending that Siegel wanted and to me is one of the strengths of this film.
The EPA sends Steve Malone (Terry Kinney) to a military base in Alabama for a month. He brings along his daughter Marti (Gabrielle Anwar), his second wife Carol (Meg Tilly) and their son Andy. Marti is scared by a soldier who tells her that "They get you when you sleep". She befriends base commander (R. Lee Ermey)'s wild daughter Jenn Platt (Christine Elise). She falls for chopper pilot Tim Young (Billy Wirth). There are strange things happening and Maj. Collins (Forest Whitaker) asks Steve if it could be chemical toxins. Military personnel delivers mysterious boxes to the Malones. Carol is the first to turn.
The major drawback is that the premise is known to everybody. There is no surprises except for the sci-fi uninitiated. The bathtub scene is pretty good although it's nothing shocking. This is a solid execution. The army base location is pretty good. Body snatchers can be camouflaged by being stoic soldiers and they are pretty creepy. There is nothing wrong with this version but it adds nothing new to the idea.
The major drawback is that the premise is known to everybody. There is no surprises except for the sci-fi uninitiated. The bathtub scene is pretty good although it's nothing shocking. This is a solid execution. The army base location is pretty good. Body snatchers can be camouflaged by being stoic soldiers and they are pretty creepy. There is nothing wrong with this version but it adds nothing new to the idea.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThis was the first film shot with Arriscope anamorphic lenses, which were created for Arri by the German manufacturer Isco-Optic.
- गूफ़(at around 3 mins) In the opening sequences, Marti is sitting on the right side of the car looking out the window. When it cuts to show her viewpoint of the moon and passing trees, the perspective is as if she were on the left side of the car.
- भाव
Carol Malone: Where you gonna go, where you gonna run, where you gonna hide? Nowhere... 'cause there's no one like you left.
- साउंडट्रैकYou Didn't Need
Written by Sim Cain, Chris Haskett, Henry Rollins and Andrew Weiss - The Rollins Band
Performed by Rollins Band (as The Rollins Band)
Courtesy of The Imago Recording Company
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Body Snatchers?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषा
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Secuestradores de cuerpos
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- Craig Air Force Base, Selma, अलबामा, संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका(Craig Field Airport and Industrial Complex)
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $1,30,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $4,28,868
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $31,494
- 17 जन॰ 1994
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $4,28,868
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें