[go: up one dir, main page]

    कैलेंडर रिलीज़ करेंटॉप 250 फ़िल्मेंसबसे लोकप्रिय फ़िल्मेंज़ोनर के आधार पर फ़िल्में ब्राउज़ करेंटॉप बॉक्स ऑफ़िसशोटाइम और टिकटफ़िल्मी समाचारइंडिया मूवी स्पॉटलाइट
    TV और स्ट्रीमिंग पर क्या हैटॉप 250 टीवी शोसबसे लोकप्रिय TV शोशैली के अनुसार टीवी शो ब्राउज़ करेंTV की खबरें
    देखने के लिए क्या हैसबसे नए ट्रेलरIMDb ओरिजिनलIMDb की पसंदIMDb स्पॉटलाइटफैमिली एंटरटेनमेंट गाइडIMDb पॉडकास्ट
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter पुरस्कारअवार्ड्स सेंट्रलफ़ेस्टिवल सेंट्रलसभी इवेंट
    जिनका जन्म आज के दिन हुआ सबसे लोकप्रिय सेलिब्रिटीसेलिब्रिटी से जुड़ी खबरें
    मदद केंद्रयोगदानकर्ता क्षेत्रपॉल
उद्योग के पेशेवरों के लिए
  • भाषा
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
वॉचलिस्ट
साइन इन करें
  • पूरी तरह से सपोर्टेड
  • English (United States)
    आंशिक रूप से सपोर्टेड
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
ऐप का इस्तेमाल करें
वापस जाएँ
  • कास्ट और क्रू
  • उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं
  • ट्रिविया
  • अक्सर पूछे जाने वाला सवाल
IMDbPro
Breeders (1986)

उपयोगकर्ता समीक्षाएं

Breeders

64 समीक्षाएं
3/10

Invasion of the space spunk.

After directing one of the most acting bereft movies of the 1980's, Robot Holocaust, gay porn director Tim Kincaid must have thought that all he needed to do was add more boobs in his next foray into mainstream film-making resulting in this straight to video T&A abomination.

Breeders begins with the rape of one of the sluttiest virgins I have ever seen by a "German" man who transforms into a bug-eyed alien. It goes downhill from here. At this point the rape victim is subjected to the worst bedside manner ever as Det. Dale Andriotti (Lance Lewman) and Dr. Gamble Pace (Teresa Farley) discuss her mutilation in all it's gory details about one foot from where she is recovering. Nice. Sadly, these two numbnuts are the main characters of this film. Dr. Pace tells Det. Andriotti, who would be more convincing cast as a paperboy, that a series of these rapes targeting virgins in New York City have become too numerous to be a coincidence. They begin to investigate the rapes together as Det. Andriotti seems to be the only police officer in the greater Manhattan area. These scenes are interspersed between supposed women of sexual purity in various forms of undress. These "virgins" engage in snorting cocaine, nude aerobics, nude cooking, and the sexually arresting nude phone conversation with their mother. Whatever the opposite of a hard-on is I've got it. Eventually all of the victims are summoned in the nude to an underground bath in, well, use your imagination. Thankfully Dr. Pace and Det. Andriotti battle the alien in an abandoned subway that is stocked full of supplies for dispatching the fiend. Perhaps they were really resourceful rats.

Everything about this movie screams amateur hour. To say that the performances are community college level would be an insult to those actors who couldn't afford money for a good school. Teresa Farley is particularly awful as she delivers her lines in the same monotone way while glancing offscreen, presumably to look at the cue cards. I have no problem with copious amounts of nudity but some of the women are more of the Bloodsucking Freaks nude for the sake of being nude variety. Little surprise from someone who's directing history consists of male locker rooms and public toilets. An eye for female beauty Mr. Kincaid has not. This movie was made for those that wanted to see naked women but didn't want to get caught coming out of that back room of the video store by one of his neighbors. "Oh, hi Mrs. Smith. What did I rent? Oh, it's just a sci-fi monster movie. See the scary alien on the box." Keep lying to yourself pervert!
  • Zeegrade
  • 14 सित॰ 2009
  • परमालिंक
4/10

Worthy Guilty Pleasure Cheapie [SPOILERS AHEAD!!]

  • Steve_Nyland
  • 27 नव॰ 2004
  • परमालिंक
3/10

Breeders

Review By Kamal K

In an instant the biggest issue with Breeders becomes apparent. It has some of the worst acting ever. Not in a 'so good it's bad' kind of way, it's just bad. Dialogue delivered as if most have only just learned how to speak, a total lack of emotion, no facial expressions...it's near unwatchable with Teresa Farley being the worst culprit.

Then you have the effects. The monster is extremely disappointing, it looks like a man in a suit and doesn't excite or intrigue.
  • IPyaarCinema
  • 16 दिस॰ 2021
  • परमालिंक

Single Aliens Seek..."Virgins"

This almost makes it into that truly rare category of a movie that's so bad it's actually entertaining--but not quite. Aliens are looking for virgins to impregnate. Why do they need virgins?--who knows. But New York City in the 1980's is definitely the wrong place to look for them. Of course, if there was anything virginal about the actresses they cast in this movie they probably wouldn't have been cast in this movie, but even the pristine credentials of the characters they play seem pretty suspect. One girl is a coke-snorting model (a group well known for their chastity). Another does her aerobics in the nude (obviously her extreme shyness would explain her intact maidenhood). You get the idea--this is the unlikeliest group of "virgins" to ever appear outside a porno film. But besides the "virgins" you have the "detective" who doesn't look like he's old enough to shave and the "aliens" who usually disguise themselves as random human males, probably because their rubbery suits are totally unconvincing. The dialogue is absolutely atrocious, especially the hilarious way everybody makes a long, dramatic pause before uttering the word. . . "virgin".

Many professional reviewers have pointed out how tasteless the climactic scene is where all these naked women writhe around in some kind of viscous alien fluid. Well, if you have any taste to begin with you wouldn't watch this movie long enough to get to that scene. If this movie was just a little more sleazy it would be a porno flick and this scene would be a great big . . . well, you get the idea. This movie isn't as good as the similar "Humanoids from the Deep", but at least the director didn't try to claim that Roger Corman or somebody went back and added all the gratuitous sex and nudity. (This would have been a 5-minute short without it). I'd only recommend this movie to sick perverts who enjoy completely tasteless, morally indefensible trash (not that that's necessarily a BAD thing. . .)
  • lazarillo
  • 31 अक्टू॰ 2004
  • परमालिंक
2/10

A senseless erotic horror film!!

Breeders is a horror-science fiction film directed by Tim Kincaid, and stars Teresa Farley, Lance Lewman, and Frances Raines.

A detective and a doctor invesigates the string of young women raped by an alien.

A terribly pathetic film with completely no sense. Girls are being raped but you'll not see a single policeman in the film just a detective and a doctor in the entire film. The plot of the film is senseless so as the execution, the screenplay of the film is cliched and the climax irritates. The film is only for the lovers of erotic horror film, other viewers can avoid this film.
  • sauravjoshi85
  • 19 दिस॰ 2021
  • परमालिंक
2/10

Such a drag of a film that's just downright creepy at times

So boring and hollow and the 'nudity' is not earned and it just feels like a creepy porno at times. Which I'm not sure what they were going for in the first place. 1 star up because some of the effects are actually pretty good it's just they are in such a hollow boring film which is a shame. If you're here for the obvious part... don't even watch it for that. This movie is just plain bad. Skip at all costs.
  • majerhawk
  • 3 मार्च 2019
  • परमालिंक
3/10

They Must Be Stopped...

  • barnthebarn
  • 21 मार्च 2005
  • परमालिंक
3/10

Gave it three *'s for the nudity

As a child of the 80's, this was the kind of nonsense I would rent from the Video store, just to see some naked ladies. 😂👌
  • mikeburnsaccount
  • 17 जन॰ 2019
  • परमालिंक
6/10

Awful-ly good

Subterranean dwelling aliens come out of the sewers long enough to rape "virgins" in order to impregnate them with there extraterrestrial seed. A doctor and detective try to figure what the hell is going on.

I knew I was in for some ridiculous b-movie crap when even before the title-card shows up we're treated to, bad acting and boobs belonging to a body double in what could be the most obvious film flub ever. And boy oh boy, everyone's favorite gay-porn director, turned crappy b-horror film director, turned gay film director again, Tim Kincaid does not disappoint. Now when I use the term 'crap' for this film, I do so giving it the best most loving connotation. I live for this trash, but if your tolerance for sleaze and utterly atrocious acting isn't high, steer clear of this one as it most definitely is NOT for you.

Eye Candy: Frances Raine shows everything with naked yoga, LeeAnne Baker also shows all; Meanwhile Natalie O'Connell shows T&A and Adrianne Lee & Amy Brentino only show breasts (plus the aforementioned body double, and some topless extras)
  • movieman_kev
  • 30 जुल॰ 2012
  • परमालिंक
1/10

Like A Virgin… Alienated for the very first time!

"Breeders" might very well be the absolute most retarded horror movie of the 1980's and that's quite an achievement on itself, since this entire decade (apart from a couple notable exceptions) was marked with stupid & pointless horror movies. You can hardly refer to this as a "movie", by the way, because there's no script, not the slightest bit of continuity and not even an attempt to build up some tension. Then…why bother? Because it has boobs! And lots of them!! The entire film is just a very poor excuse to show naked ladies when they're showering, practicing aerobics, changing outfits or bathing all together in a gooey alien-whirlpool (we'll get back to that later!). For no particular reason, horny aliens (I'm still not sure whether it's just one or a group) land in downtown Manhattan and immediately begin to sexually assault the few remaining local virgins. A not-so-intelligent police inspector and an inexperienced female doctor start to investigate, but they discover…nothing! Meanwhile, more girls get raped and they're all guided back – under alien hypnosis – to the Manhattan sewer system where they all bath together in slime! What the hell? Okay, the only positive thing you can possibly say about "Breeders" is that it's an acceptable guilty pleasure! You can switch off all brain-activities whilst enjoying the explicit nudity and the campy gore-effects, but everything else is simply insufferable. All the cast members deserve to die a most horrible death and it was a very wise career choice for writer/director Tim Kincaid to continue in the gay porn business.
  • Coventry
  • 20 अग॰ 2006
  • परमालिंक
10/10

An awesomely awful 80's direct-to-video sci-fi/horror atrocity

  • Woodyanders
  • 31 मई 2006
  • परमालिंक
7/10

A Model's Worse Nightmare

This is a movie that I owned for such a long time, why? Because it was so bad, it was good. In my personal vision it was a huge guilty pleasure that I'm guilty of owning. The story tells of a mysterious occurrence of young virgin women getting raped and experiencing selective memory loss. The only problem is, the people who are responsible for this violent act some sort of slimy creature that lives beneath the city. Things become even more complicated when the DNA match turns out to be not human. What this movie does do a good job of is the gore and creature features that are peppered throughout this tale. However, what this movie does not do a good job is the acting. It had a very interesting concept of combining pornography with horror, through even with good intention it fell through the roof.

First off, this movie had some very good gore and creature effects that I did not expect this movie to have. When it came to things popping out of people's stomachs, tearing open skin, attacking people and horrific creature design, I will give this movie a standing ovation. There was one scene, in particular, that really mesmerized me when it came to make up and effects. Ted, one of the photographers, has one of the Breeders coming out of his chest and we see him tear open his chest skin while pockets of pink, slimy flesh start to pop out. That was probably the worse scene in the entire movie. There was a great "Scanners" scene were a head explodes and a Breeder emerges and a horrifically creepy end scene where all the virgin women are bathing in a pool of alien sperm. This movie just freaks me out when it comes to make-up and creature features.

The acting in the movie was far from good, though surprisingly not the worse. You have Teresa Farley, who plays Dr. Pace, and Lance Lewman, who plays Det. Andriotti who had some great potential but they were much too somber even when things were coming to a boil. They didn't seem dedicated to their role or even put effort into trying to look panicked or scares. One line of dialogue, uttered by Lewman's character, should have been yelled but instead it was said, "Your f**king bananas." You have painfully over-dramatic roles that came from Frances Raines, Natalie O'Connell, Amy Brentano and LeeAnn Baker, otherwise known as the main virgins in this movie. The movie wants you to feel sorry for them, but they all seemed too stuck up and paranoid for me to feel sorry for them. In other words, they were begging to be taken.

What this movie tried to do and I will give them credit for a good concept with good intentions, was to combine "soft" core porn with a horror movie. There were plenty of scenes with naked women and a lot of sexual related themes; in fact, it's almost like a reworking or even homage to Cronenberg's Shivers. However, after seeing so much nakedness the nudity became overrated and very redundant, like there was no need for a woman to come home to her kitchen and just strip to take a shower. It's almost like the girls wanted the role so that they can show off what they have, only problem is, they have nothing to show off. They tried to combine suspense with this concept and it just looked weird and awkward for an alien to attack and rape a naked young girl. It just seemed way too uncomfortable for any kind of thing to do that.

Overall, there was some bad acting and a failed concept of horror-porn and some top notch creature effects, but I enjoy watching this film for those exact reasons. I have my share of guilty pleasures, two being Chopping Mall and Snakes on a Plane, and this is another timeless classic that failed when it came out, but has a cult following. I would recommend this movie to those who enjoy cult classics as well as any horror movie fan, though if you are younger then you may want to avoid it because of the nudity. In my opinion, its probably one of the great cheesy and stupid horror / sci-fi movies of the 80 and I think it will go down as a timeless classic.
  • jamhorner
  • 23 फ़र॰ 2008
  • परमालिंक
1/10

Jippy-Dippty-Flop.

I don't know what to make of this movie except to wonder who let this movie be made. This film seemed like it started out to be one of those Adult-Film scripts that someone else got a hold of and said, "Hey, I can add to it and make it more mainstream!" To be honest, it would have been horrid as an adult X-rated film, and it is horrible as an R-rated film. It's so "T & A" its ridiculous. I think it would have been alot better if they HAD went to the adult film genre to cast some of these folks. The idea of some outer space, etc., creatures coming down to earth to "re-populate" their dying species is not a new one...in Sci-fi, Horror or..in adult rated films. Neither was sending the creatures to "slimy" 1980-esque New York City to do so. But this was just a bunch of bad acting, bad special effects, bad writing..with not one redeeming quality to it. It's not campy, it just stupid. I guess in our Sci-Fi heart of hearts, we all wanted the film to go "somewhere" with it's theme, but it just kept going into the gutter. Pass on this one.
  • lambiepie-2
  • 25 अप्रैल 2003
  • परमालिंक

Is There an Actor in the House?

Aliens come to downtown Manhattan and live underground only to come out and victimize virgin girls and impregnate them with alien seed. This movie is rubbish on so many levels. First of all, it is more of a soft core pornography film rather than a science fiction/horror film. Just about every female actress bares her top AND bottom. One dances nude to music for what seems like an eternity. The premise that all these girls are virgins crosses the line of suspension of disbelief credibility, as one, moments prior to her nude aerobics, snorts a line of cocaine. The film also suffers from some of the worst, uninspired acting I have seen in quite some time. None...and I mean none of the "talents" in this film can act. Little wonder none of them became successful. Teresa Farley, a beautiful girl, plays a doctor named Gamble out to solve the mystery of what is happening to these girls that appear to have been raped. She looks off while she utters her lines. Silences are a part of all the thespians' craft here. Poor acting notwithstanding, the plot is ludicrous. The special effects are nothing more than guys in rubber suits and blood coming out of mouths. I was very disappointed with this as the video box had some alien on it akin to what was in the movie Alien. Fat chance here! This film is nothing more than a voyeuristic foray into the adolescent mind of director Kinkaid. His abilities are practically nil as no suspense, no depth, and no storytelling are pervasive throughout. What you DO get are lots of girls disrobing in the most unlikely places, a group of women in some goo waving their arms, and aliens in rubber suits with big metal eyes in cheap sets populated by insincere, amateurish actors. This one is definitely NOT in the ranks of best in breed!
  • BaronBl00d
  • 24 नव॰ 2004
  • परमालिंक
1/10

Pornographic Rubbish

  • Agaric
  • 8 जून 2005
  • परमालिंक
3/10

Unpleasant breeding!

  • lost-in-limbo
  • 21 जून 2006
  • परमालिंक
1/10

I actually wrote about this movie in my personal blog years ago...

I called my review simply: "the Worst Movie I Ever Saw" because I couldn't find more accurate words to describe the horror I viewed on my TV. I have never said that I despise a movie or that it's the worst. Even the ones on Sci-Fi (SyFy???) are mildly entertaining because they are so bad. Usually a movie has something that will redeem it so I can't say it was absolutely terrible. This movie however has no redeeming qualities, it's exactly as the others who hated it here describe and I hate myself for having subjected myself to this monstrosity.

Following is the review I gave it for my own well being...I had to do something with the thoughts of disbelief swirling around in my head after watching it.

I recently saw a movie that was unbelievably terrible in every aspect of all that is shitty. You see, when the digital conversion thing went through last year and people without cable had to get the converter, those who had regular un-digital cable, like us, were able to get a digital converter box. When that happened, all of a sudden we were able to get Comcast on Demand. A perk of this service of course being, free movies that we are able to watch on demand.

Well, my husband was searching through the free movies and stops at this one called "Breeders". We read the description given for it and it sounded at the very least tolerable with promise of maybe being good.

From the moment the movie started until the second it ended I felt my jaw stretching open more and more as I was unable to close it from the sheer shock of how utterly terrible this piece of crap was. The storyline was the stupidest thing I ever dared to think someone would write about, the acting was below sub-sub-par, and when I say special effects, I mean that there weren't any. This film needed a whole lotta something. Namely that it should have never been made. What a waste of time and $5.00.

I remember thinking I felt bad for the actors in it because they probably thought this could have been their big break. Holy crap, they were probably all ordered to be executed so that the world might move past the tragedy they helped to create on screen.

I really couldn't believe it. This "masterpiece" was made in 1986.
  • GoNiFo
  • 5 अप्रैल 2012
  • परमालिंक
2/10

Time hasn't been kind to this one.

  • swind74
  • 14 जून 2005
  • परमालिंक
2/10

The SLEAZE Charlie!

I just can't believe it, the sleaze in this film is god tier.

This is the kind of film you'd get your Grandma to rent you cause the cover looks amazing and then you'd watch it and because it's so terrible but there is nudity, and you'd be thinking 'Well, it's got a bunch of nudity but is it really worth it?'

A bunch of average 80's ladies get naked and are attacked by people in Halloween costumes with only a single decent effect on display.
  • Agent_Smoulder
  • 13 सित॰ 2019
  • परमालिंक
6/10

Porn Director Makes a Low Budget Horror Film

The Manhattan General Hospital has admitted a string of young women who have been raped by something otherworldly...

I like when films start with reptilian creatures grabbing women and carrying them off while gobs of gore splatter on the ground... no disrespect to fair maidens, but seeing them abducted is far more satisfying than if it were young men -- is that sexist?

Not sure what is up with the very ugly model and terrible tan lines. I mean, I know it was the 1980s, but is this the best New York had to offer? And then there is a long sequence of her working out nude while cheesy music plays. The film is not that long to begin with -- if you cut out this very gratuitous scene, you could probably have fit the whole film into an hour slot. (Director Tim Kincaid is primarily a gay porn director, though, so maybe this should be expected.)

Nice effects on the chest-popping scene... Somehow this went from being distributed by Wizard Video to MGM... I hope Charlie Band made a few bucks off of it.

If you want to see some of the ugliest, boniest women naked on screen for far too long, this might be the film for you. Besides that, it does not really have that much to offer. (There is a strange, subtle message that sex before marriage is bad, though -- only virgins get impregnated by "breeders". Be a whore and you will be safe!)
  • gavin6942
  • 18 अक्टू॰ 2012
  • परमालिंक
4/10

It's a case like this that makes me want to kill every man ever born.

  • lastliberal
  • 3 जुल॰ 2010
  • परमालिंक
10/10

An Honest Review

So I saw this when I was about 10, late at night, on HBO. I'm pretty sure it was HBO at least.

At any rate I watched it before I was aware of Hentai or Anime, or whatever it's called. I remember back in the day, when it was on USA (I think) they billed it as Japanimation--which depending on how you read it is either Japan-Imation or incredibly racist.

Which is probably why they don't call it that anymore.

Anyway, "Breeders" is like the live action version of most of those cartoons. It's really nudity + monster rape. All they needed to add was school girls in sailor uniforms and it would exactly like the worst stereotype of one of those Anime cartoons.

However, it is also incredibly 80s and that decade knew how to do cliched cheesy pretty well. So it's Anime meets the 80s Cheese meets horrible horror movie. So, really, it's incredibly fun to watch.

So I am giving it 10 out of 10 stars because it entertains, because despite the fact that it is a really bad movie, it's also a very fun movie to watch.
  • generationofswine
  • 14 जन॰ 2019
  • परमालिंक
6/10

We cum in peace!

Movie monsters have been attracted to sexy women since the dawn of cinema, but only a small percentage of them have gone so far as to give the object of their affection some SERIOUS monster lovin'. The creatures in Breeders are definitely in the minority who can't wait to get their feelers wet.

In this silly low-budget piece of B-movie sci-fi/horror, several women are left hospitalised after being subjected to vicious sex attacks; the only connection between the victims: they were all virgins (hard to believe, looking at them, but there you go). Det. Dale Andriotti (Lance Lewman) investigates the case, and with the help of Dr. Gamble Pace (Teresa Farley, who sports unfeasibly large hair), he discovers that an alien race is attempting to propagate their species on Earth by mating with 'pure, undiseased' human females.

This slim plot allows director Tim Kincaid to string together a series of lurid scenes in which his virginal young women get buck naked (they may be pure, but they sure ain't shy!), whilst also throwing in the odd spot of gore for splatter fans (Ed French's effects are, for the most part, rather laughable, although there is an impressive bit of bladder work when one character's skin bulges nastily before splitting open).

An amazingly daft ending sees Andriotti finally tracking an alien to an abandoned subway tunnel where he finds a 'nest'—an extraterrestrial hot-tub full of sticky white goop in which the creature's victims writhe naked (it all looks suspiciously like the aftermath at a bukkake convention). After a brief struggle with a deformed alien child and a bigger bug-eyed critter (roasted using a can of petrol conveniently found nearby), Andriotti cooks the whole nest by connecting a reel of electric cable (also conveniently found nearby) to the third rail.

It's poorly written and directed, the sets are lame, and the actors are dreadful, but Breeders has enough bums, boobs, bush, blood and bug-eyed monster action to make it reasonable fun for fans of really bad z-grade horror.

5.5 out of 10, rounded up to 6 for IMDb.
  • BA_Harrison
  • 23 जन॰ 2010
  • परमालिंक
2/10

Good Concept... BAD Film...

If I worked at Metro Goldwyn Mayer I would try to hunt down every copy of this film and have a nice big bonfire and a wake. Getting rid of this film is cause for celebration and drunkenness.

Everything about this film is atrocious apart from the concept of the story and a few of the special effects.

The story centres around the rapes of virginal women in Manhattan. Someone or something is stalking these women in their endeavour to bring about the women's impregnation. The trouble is the story is so poorly scripted in eliminates any good elements.

As for the special effects these are all over the place. From brilliant to frightful (and not in a good way). The brilliant has to be chest scene at the photo studio. When one of the staff starts to transform they collapse to the ground in agony and their chest starts to undulate beneath the skin. This is so good that when you get a closeup you cannot see where the fake chest meets the real neck of the actor. The ugliest effect has to be the monster. This alien is a-la Dr Who of the '70's and '80's. It's not much more than a man in a pair of black wellies, a wetsuit, and a tricked out helmet and gloves.

One of the things I did like was the nudity. Not just because I'm a bloke but because it was mainly realistic and not for titivation (except for a couple of small scenes). For example, the scene where Alec (Adriane Lee) answers her mother's phone call. While chatting she strips off her work clothes and gets ready for a bath. Now I've done similar and I know others who have. I even know of a couple who do yoga while naked so all of this felt natural. Though there is a lot of nudity and not all of it is called for,

However, none of these factors makes this film worth watching - not even once. Take a look at my Absolute Horror list for a better Horror flick to watch... or check my other lists for more possibilities. But stay away from this atrocity to filmmaking.
  • S1rr34l
  • 16 अग॰ 2019
  • परमालिंक

Alien goo movie

*SPOILER ALERT* * SPOILER ALERT*

You might think this movie is about aliens. You'd be wrong. Sure there are aliens, and they do attack. But what the movie is really about is breasts. Female breasts. Naked female breasts.

Naked woman are attacked by aroused aliens. Yes. That's right. It looked cheap and tacky. It was cheap and tacky. Still a good time for an aliens on the hunt movie.

Near the end, all the naked women jump into a pot of alien goo. I'm not saying what's in that goo, but the title is "Breeders". A high point in B-movie moments.

It was sleaze to please. I was pleased.
  • Dr. Gore
  • 3 दिस॰ 2002
  • परमालिंक

इस शीर्षक से अधिक

एक्सप्लोर करने के लिए और भी बहुत कुछ

हाल ही में देखे गए

कृपया इस फ़ीचर का इस्तेमाल करने के लिए ब्राउज़र कुकीज़ चालू करें. और जानें.
IMDb ऐप पाएँ
ज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करेंज़्यादा एक्सेस के लिए साइन इन करें
सोशल पर IMDb को फॉलो करें
IMDb ऐप पाएँ
Android और iOS के लिए
IMDb ऐप पाएँ
  • सहायता
  • साइट इंडेक्स
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • IMDb डेटा लाइसेंस
  • प्रेस रूम
  • विज्ञापन
  • नौकरियाँ
  • उपयोग की शर्तें
  • गोपनीयता नीति
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, एक Amazon कंपनी

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.