The Ages of Lulu

As some films those has been a dime for cinephiles here another nugget to pin as favourite on the board. The actors very keenly learned acting and staged it with a good practice of reading. Yeah they nailed it.

I have been shocked and stunned by saw "Love (2015)" by Gaspar noe and thought he was the first to break the laws of film certifications but now I'm struct between the melodies and cinematography in this film. I even said to myself that "we found father of noe"

This must be one of the inspiration for Gaspar. It's obvious. And in 1990's period oh my god I couldn't think how mature the writers and the Director was.

Plus I donno why it got so low rating for a monumental modern script. Well if it would be screen now I'm solid this would reach every laptops on the movie lovers

This early (1990) major feature from Bigas Luna is the one which – not surprisingly – got him noticed. It is an uncompromising study of sexuality, exploring desires which most directors would shy away from – on and probably off the camera. Italian actress Francesca Neri plays the lead character. It's an erotic, uninhibited performance, taking Lulu from an innocent virgin with a crush on her brother's friend to a woman so desperate for carnal gratification that she trawls bars looking for men with which to have three-way sex. For some, the film's frankness – masturbation, homosexual sex and cunnilingus – and exploration of everything from transsexual sex to incest might bring it close to pornography. But it is refreshing to see these challenging areas of sex dealt with by a competent director and good cast of actors. It hints at the themes which would run through Luna's later work, such as Jamon, Jamon and Golden Balls but without the quirky humour of those films. Slightly exhausting, perhaps taking on too much of the dark side of sexuality.

How the hell did the great actor Javier Bardem agree to work in this piece of garbage. He is in a couple of graphic sex scenes with bothe men and women.

Francesca Neri is beautiful and plays the title character Lulu from the age of fifteen(Neri was twenty-five) when she hooks up with a much older friend of her brother and within the first ten minutes, Pablo has her sitting in a chair while he proceeds to shave her private area with a razor. I am astounded that this was released as a mainstream film.

The pair are constantly in heat and Lulu gives birth to a daughter. Pablo has a threesome and Lulu leaves and becomes fascinated by the sex lives of gay men and joins in their couplings.

Please avoid this trash.

Aptly described as "pretentious, repellent pornography," The Ages of Lulu is a film you really could do without. Indeed, not only does Spanish director Bigas Luna's (he of Jamón, jamón, Golden Balls and The Tit and the Moon fame) film fire hugely clear of the mark in its attempt at sexually heightened drama, it also suffers from a dodgy cast (Javier Bardem, what were you thinking?), lame acting and a wholly unrealistic plot. Not to put too fine a point on it, then, you'd be better served boiling your head than watching this hyper-sexual and highly explicit 'art house' trash.

On the DVD: The Ages of Lulu is transferred at an anamorphically enhanced 1.78:1 and image quality is very good, though in some scenes very slightly soft. The film can be watched with or without English subtitles, and the sound is unremarkable stereo. The main extras are a seven-page essay on Bigas Luna and five pages detailing the now restored 110 seconds of cuts made to the 1998 video release. The main title still contains 65 seconds of alternate footage to the cinema original for legal reasons. Also included are filmographies of Lunas and Oscar Ladoire, two trailers plus trailers for six other films.

This is the story of a woman through told pretty much through her sex life. As the film progresses we watch as her life goes from one of normalcy to one on the fringes of "normal" society, and its a course mirrored by her sex life. It is a very lurid film that pretty much covers every sexual subject you can think of, and probably some you can't. Its a well made movie that is so close to being an explicit film that one wonders why they didn't bother to go all the way and not shy away from showing it all. But its not really about the sex, since this is a smutty film that has the belief that its about something other than just showing hot sweaty sex. I'm not sure if thats true or not. Actually I'm not sure what I think of this film. frankly its one of those movies that you see and aren't enthused by, but which you find yourself haunted by none the less. There is something about the film that keeps me wondering if its not better than I think it is. Then again it maybe the desire to see the hot sweaty sex again (It really is steamy)

If you're not prudish and ready to deal with sex in all of its varieties then by all means dive in and give it a try. If you are offended by anything other than straight forward heterosexual sex, then stay away.