अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA German journalist, escaping from broken marriage, goes to Lebanon to cover the civil war. Soon, he realizes that he can't handle the truth.A German journalist, escaping from broken marriage, goes to Lebanon to cover the civil war. Soon, he realizes that he can't handle the truth.A German journalist, escaping from broken marriage, goes to Lebanon to cover the civil war. Soon, he realizes that he can't handle the truth.
- पुरस्कार
- 1 जीत और कुल 5 नामांकन
- Berger
- (as Martin Urtel)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Anyway, it's a really good, really intense movie. The ethical questions surrounding reporting on war are probably some of the most important, and the movie does a fine job looking at them. I recommend it.
Georg Laschen, the main hero of the film, played by the wonderful actor who was Bruno Ganz, is a war reporter. Two revolutions took place in the reporting and dissemination of international news in the 40 years that have passed since the making of this film. At the end of the 1980s, it was the emergence of cable news which became popular enough in a short time, so that the fall of the Berlin Wall or the first Gulf War were broadcast live worldwide, and the news consumers were exposed directly to the images of the occurring events. A few years later, the Internet became ubiquitous, and every owner of a laptop or mobile phone became not only a consumer of news 24 hours a day, but also a potential source of news and images, instantly accessible anywhere. In the early 1980s, however, the responsibility for generating news was still entrusted to a small group of reporters broadcasting from the hot areas of the globe. The potential to inform and misinform was also present, then as now, in any report and the information has since become commodity. Reporters and photographers risked their lives (for a consistent pay in many cases) but what reached the news consumers were the sensational information, politically filtered by the editors, chosen according to the fashion of the day and the public's current interest for one cause or another. In the film, a flight of several hours transported the hero from the comfortable and safe world in which his only problems were those related to the family, in an area of war where life and violence coexisted in a way that can be understood only by those who have lived in such a part of the world. The process of knowledge that Georg Laschen goes through is not only a course of political education that leads him to reviewing his opinions about good and evil, justice and truth, but also one of personal knowledge. Can love be a savior, or any relationship is just an escapist fun, an illusory and temporary refuge? Can one rely on himself in limit situations? What are the limits? What is any of us able to do to in order to survive?
'Circle of Deceit' offers to Bruno Ganz the opportunity of one of his top creations, and it reinforces my opinion that he was one of the best, if not the best German film actor of the last half century. Hanna Schygulla plays the ambiguous role of a woman who chooses to live her life, femininity, motherhood in the neighborhood of death. This is perhaps not her best role. Much of the filming took place on location in Beirut, in a relatively safe area but close enough to the conflict to provide not only authentic scenery and extras, but also the noises and images of the conflict seen from short distance. This is one of the most realistic films about and against the war that I have seen, a film that blows up the boundaries between fiction and reality, between 'art' and documentary. The director uses in many scenes the style of war reporting, and after a while violence becomes the normal, while the scenes of normal life turn into surrealist experiences. The film was made 40 years ago, and can be considered 'historic' in its details of the Lebanese civil war. In the 40 years since the filming of 'Circle of Deceit' we saw similar images of war, terrorism, destruction, from many other parts of the world in fiction films and in the news. The change is that distances seem to have become smaller, the seemingly distant conflicts became actuality for all areas of the world because of the flow of refugees or the global export of terrorism. The individual confrontation with the absurdity of war and violence as true as ever.
The film was shot on location in Beirut which guarantees a very authentic look to the damaged city. Many of the "action" scenes also look very effective and the sense of danger is well created, even though the main focus is given to psychological things like Laschen's attempts to grasp the situation, not thrilling bomb attacks and firefights. Sometimes the pacing feels a little slow, but the acting is good throughout. Especially the brooding Ganz and the pragmatic Skolimowski play well together, bringing life to their very different characters.
The most notable sentiment present in the film is the complete lack of optimism. The war is portrayed as completely inhumane and unheroic waste of life: the photographs and scenes depicting unspeakable mistreatment of civilians stay in the viewer's mind for a long time. The film doesn't offer a hopeful or positive message on either of its two levels, general or personal – no solution for either the war or Laschen's own anxiety seems possible. "Our only real chance to fight the violence is to not let it start in the first place" is the vibe I'm getting out of the film – an effective piece of cinema.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThis film was part of a cycle of pictures made during the 1980s that featured journalists covering war. The movies include Salvador (1986), Under Fire (1983), Circle of Deceit [Die Fälschung (1981)], Deadline (1987), Cry Freedom (1987), किलिंग फील्ड्स (1984) and The Year of Living Dangerously (1982).
- भाव
Sister Brigitte: I must tell you, though, if you change your mind, we absolutely will not take him back.
Ariane Nassar: But he has been baptized!
Sister Brigitte: Yes, we have done everything necessary.
Georg Laschen: Then he's not a heathen.
Ariane Nassar: What sum had you considered?
Sister Brigitte: Whatever you choose to give. The convent really needs help.
Ariane Nassar: A thousand? Two thousand?
Sister Brigitte: Two thousand seems a lot.
Ariane Nassar: Not to me.
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटOpening credits run in a single at the bottom of the screen, right to left in the style of a news ticker.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in Sneak Previews: Fantasia/The Kirlean Witness/Diva/Circle of Deceit (1982)
टॉप पसंद
- How long is Circle of Deceit?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 48 मिनट
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 1.85 : 1