IMDb रेटिंग
3.8/10
6.6 हज़ार
आपकी रेटिंग
अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA military weapons engineer struggles to do his job responsibly, while a hapless tank commander has to live with the consequences in combat years later.A military weapons engineer struggles to do his job responsibly, while a hapless tank commander has to live with the consequences in combat years later.A military weapons engineer struggles to do his job responsibly, while a hapless tank commander has to live with the consequences in combat years later.
- निर्देशक
- लेखक
- स्टार
- पुरस्कार
- कुल 1 नामांकन
Charles David Richards
- Mugger
- (as Stoney Richards)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
Dudley Moore and Eddie Murphy are two entirely different looking actors who have two things in common. They were both hugely popular box office comedy stars throughout the 1980's and they were both part of the cast of this 1984 Paramount release. If these two comedy titans had any scenes together, that could've made the film really great but despite that setback, the film is not a total waste. Two stories are told in the film. One has to do with technology programmer Wylie Cooper's (Moore) chance encounter with a man who's on the run from some shady corporate criminals and how Cooper's life changes for the better and for the worse after the encounter. The other is set two years later and has to do with American soldier Landry (Murphy) test driving a faulty experimental tank that Cooper had invented and accidentally driving it into the middle of a battlefield. That tank (Cooper building it and Landry using it) is what the two stories have in common. The most major complaint about this film is its constantly shifting from one story to the other thus confusing some viewers. I managed to follow along though and if anybody who's thinking of seeing this one can too, you may find both leading actors in fine form. Just don't expect the comedy sparks of their far more successful individually starring vehicles including "Arthur" and "Beverly Hills Cop."
This is no masterpiece, but it's pretty good and offers lots of laughs and excitement. The ending is especially satisfying.
Dudley Moore does a pretty good job. I'm aware he has received acclaim for some of his roles. This isn't one of them.
I know David Rasche best as a reckless cop supposedly based on Dirty Harry. He's nearly as talented here.
Eddie Murphy dies what he does best: laugh and cry. However, I've seen better from him.
Don't expect too much, and I don't believe this film will disappoint.
Dudley Moore does a pretty good job. I'm aware he has received acclaim for some of his roles. This isn't one of them.
I know David Rasche best as a reckless cop supposedly based on Dirty Harry. He's nearly as talented here.
Eddie Murphy dies what he does best: laugh and cry. However, I've seen better from him.
Don't expect too much, and I don't believe this film will disappoint.
On a dull evening at home recently I saw this was showing on ITV2, and I settled down to enjoy what I thought would be a reasonably amusing comedy.
Oh dear.
Peter Cook and Dudley Moore were one of the greatest ever comedy acts. Peter Cook was a hilarious solo act. Dudley Moore was a brilliant musician...but NOT a good solo comedy player.
All Mr Moore's films seem to have him in an ill fitting three piece suit and horrible seventies hairstyle, running manically around hotel corridors and swearing a lot. This film is no exception.
It just didn't have any really funny moments. Mr Murphy (whose scenes were slotted in later) had one or two funny lines but that was about it.
If Saddam Hussein got the idea of invading Iraq from this film, that would be a good reason to ban it!
Oh dear.
Peter Cook and Dudley Moore were one of the greatest ever comedy acts. Peter Cook was a hilarious solo act. Dudley Moore was a brilliant musician...but NOT a good solo comedy player.
All Mr Moore's films seem to have him in an ill fitting three piece suit and horrible seventies hairstyle, running manically around hotel corridors and swearing a lot. This film is no exception.
It just didn't have any really funny moments. Mr Murphy (whose scenes were slotted in later) had one or two funny lines but that was about it.
If Saddam Hussein got the idea of invading Iraq from this film, that would be a good reason to ban it!
Even though this film was not entertaining, it is prophetic. This movie predicts that Iraq will invade Kuwait, and that the US will be involved, 7 years before it actually happens.
Perhaps Sadaam got the idea from this movie, and it convinced him that he could win. After all, he did watch CNN.
Perhaps Sadaam got the idea from this movie, and it convinced him that he could win. After all, he did watch CNN.
An ironic aspect of this otherwise indigestible flop is that the final concept, although created as a desperate, expos facto attempt to inject life into the film, might have actually worked, had it been in the plan from the beginning.
Although the future plot line (or present, according to how you wish to perceive it) involving Murphy was filmed later, the concept of one plot line's actions having a direct result on another in the future could have been interesting. All it needed was a script, production values, creative foresight and inspired performances by the actors. This film, unfortunately, had none of the above.
Moore is convinced that a device slated to be installed on a tank is defective in its design, and must try to fix it before it's built and put into use. Two years in the future, sure enough, Murphy is driving a tank which uses this very device. Will Moore improve the design in time to save Murphy's life? Well, it's little confusing to flash back and forth between these plot lines, but they do manage to culminate into a semi-climactic moment, but much too late to save the viewer from mindless boredom.
Although the future plot line (or present, according to how you wish to perceive it) involving Murphy was filmed later, the concept of one plot line's actions having a direct result on another in the future could have been interesting. All it needed was a script, production values, creative foresight and inspired performances by the actors. This film, unfortunately, had none of the above.
Moore is convinced that a device slated to be installed on a tank is defective in its design, and must try to fix it before it's built and put into use. Two years in the future, sure enough, Murphy is driving a tank which uses this very device. Will Moore improve the design in time to save Murphy's life? Well, it's little confusing to flash back and forth between these plot lines, but they do manage to culminate into a semi-climactic moment, but much too late to save the viewer from mindless boredom.
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिवियाThough Eddie Murphy is listed as Strategic Guest Star, he claimed in an interview with David Letterman that he was paid more for his work in this film than for 48 Hrs. (1982) and ट्रेडिंग प्लेसस (1983) combined.
- भाव
Chief Padilla, Guatemala: Boom. Dead. Communista.
- इसके अलावा अन्य वर्जनABC edited just 35 seconds from this film for its 1987 network television premiere.
- कनेक्शनFeatured in At the Movies: The Stinkers of 1984 (1985)
- साउंडट्रैकOn the Road Again
Written by Willie Nelson
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Best Defense?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
- रिलीज़ की तारीख़
- कंट्री ऑफ़ ओरिजिन
- भाषाएं
- इस रूप में भी जाना जाता है
- Best Defence
- फ़िल्माने की जगहें
- उत्पादन कंपनियां
- IMDbPro पर और कंपनी क्रेडिट देखें
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $1,80,00,000(अनुमानित)
- US और कनाडा में सकल
- $1,92,65,302
- US और कनाडा में पहले सप्ताह में कुल कमाई
- $78,72,297
- 22 जुल॰ 1984
- दुनिया भर में सकल
- $1,92,65,302
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें