अपनी भाषा में प्लॉट जोड़ेंA 1980s classic in which a game of "Dungeons and Dragons" is the centerpiece of a mystery. Adam happens to come from a long line of cursed men; he succumbs to the curse and goes on a killing... सभी पढ़ेंA 1980s classic in which a game of "Dungeons and Dragons" is the centerpiece of a mystery. Adam happens to come from a long line of cursed men; he succumbs to the curse and goes on a killing spree.A 1980s classic in which a game of "Dungeons and Dragons" is the centerpiece of a mystery. Adam happens to come from a long line of cursed men; he succumbs to the curse and goes on a killing spree.
Winnie Farrell
- Mrs. Sullivan
- (as Winnifred Farrell)
James Coburn
- Simco The Magician
- (as Jim Coburn)
William Lynn
- M.C.
- (as Bill Lynn)
फ़ीचर्ड समीक्षाएं
I don't even know where to begin. The Scooby-like music. The frumpy male lead who, apparently, was Johnny Depp before there was Johnny Depp. The stiff, wooden females. The guy making the puzzle (I mean, what the heck does that prove?) This movie makes me want to puke whenever I see it and for some reason I see it often. You have to wonder why it is that every woman in town is unaccountably attracted to Adam. The edges of this guy's mouth are turned down so far, that even when he smiles it looks like he's frowning. But what can I say? The theme song is very catchy. It sticks to you like painful, prickly brambles. Basically, the whole movie is like a bad high school play, and obviously had the budget of one. All in all, I recommend this movie to fans of truly horrible cinema. Like me.
For the record, that was a rhetorical question. I don't know, and deep down, I don't wanna know. All I know is that recently, I experienced the single most dull 90 minutes of my life. You understand, this isn't "so bad it's good" (Criminally Insane), or even "so bad it's mind-blowing" (Troll 2). I'm talking about head-ache-inducing boredom. I don't care how far into the B-movie universe you've gone. You're not ready for this. Please, for the love of God, let this one be.
I sat there and observed the entire duration of this film. Looking closely for something, anything which might resemble entertainment value. But nothing ever happened. Not a thing. I mean, stuff happened. Conversations were had, people got killed. But why? Who were they? Did they deserve it? I just don't understand. Was I not supposed to? My questions are endless. But you know something? There are a lot of bizarre films out there that people joke about the director being on acid, or something similar (Horror House On Highway 5), but really, this is probably it. If someone was heavily into such a drug, and they just happened to get the idea that making a movie would be a swell idea, then I would imagine that their first attempt at art would turn out something like... you guessed it. Skullduggery!!
Just kidding. I'm pretty sure acid isn't to blame for this travesty. With that said, Let this be a valuable lesson to any Dungeons & Dragons geeks out there, who may get any ideas. Stay out of the world of B-cinema. You don't get it, and you never will. Just continue doing what you're doing, and don't try and be cute, by attempting to educate the world about you're favorite thing. I cannot specify enough that we are not talking about something so bad it's good. Skullduggery ain't ahead of its time, nor is it too deep to grasp. it's like watching Nascar, or C-SPAN. And really, how typical is it that this movie would be released on DVD by Substance. And what, may I ask, is up with Substance, anyway? How does a company that only acquires the most unwatchable obscurities go about staying in business? Skullduggery, I was warned about you. Every review I ever read turned out to be a warning, in one form or another. It was foolish of me for wanting you to be apart of my collection of obscure Horror. And now, I'm stuck with you. I realize that I'm the one to blame for my own misfortunes. But I won't let that stop me from despising you until my dying day. Hopefully, someday, I will learn to leave well enough alone when it comes to the unwatchables, but you will always be Skullduggery, and nothing will ever change that. And believe me when I say that I will forever warn other over-confident B-movie enthusiasts of your mind-numbing worthlessness. 1/10
I sat there and observed the entire duration of this film. Looking closely for something, anything which might resemble entertainment value. But nothing ever happened. Not a thing. I mean, stuff happened. Conversations were had, people got killed. But why? Who were they? Did they deserve it? I just don't understand. Was I not supposed to? My questions are endless. But you know something? There are a lot of bizarre films out there that people joke about the director being on acid, or something similar (Horror House On Highway 5), but really, this is probably it. If someone was heavily into such a drug, and they just happened to get the idea that making a movie would be a swell idea, then I would imagine that their first attempt at art would turn out something like... you guessed it. Skullduggery!!
Just kidding. I'm pretty sure acid isn't to blame for this travesty. With that said, Let this be a valuable lesson to any Dungeons & Dragons geeks out there, who may get any ideas. Stay out of the world of B-cinema. You don't get it, and you never will. Just continue doing what you're doing, and don't try and be cute, by attempting to educate the world about you're favorite thing. I cannot specify enough that we are not talking about something so bad it's good. Skullduggery ain't ahead of its time, nor is it too deep to grasp. it's like watching Nascar, or C-SPAN. And really, how typical is it that this movie would be released on DVD by Substance. And what, may I ask, is up with Substance, anyway? How does a company that only acquires the most unwatchable obscurities go about staying in business? Skullduggery, I was warned about you. Every review I ever read turned out to be a warning, in one form or another. It was foolish of me for wanting you to be apart of my collection of obscure Horror. And now, I'm stuck with you. I realize that I'm the one to blame for my own misfortunes. But I won't let that stop me from despising you until my dying day. Hopefully, someday, I will learn to leave well enough alone when it comes to the unwatchables, but you will always be Skullduggery, and nothing will ever change that. And believe me when I say that I will forever warn other over-confident B-movie enthusiasts of your mind-numbing worthlessness. 1/10
I was tempted to turn off during the awful opening theme song for Skullduggery, but if I had I would have missed out on one of the strangest films of the '80s. I suspect that the incredibly bizarre execution of this movie was deliberate, but what I fail to understand is why: Why put so much effort into making something so unintelligible? Why waste money filming a script that would surely struggle to turn a profit? Why put your name to something that is unlikely to help your movie career? So many questions...
The film begins in 1382 in Canterbury, England, where a wizard is betrayed by a nobleman, and so curses his offspring for generations to come. Cut to Trottelville, USA, 1982, where Adam (Thom Haverstock) and Barbara (Wendy Crewson) work at a costume shop. After hours, they join a few friends for a Dungeons and Dragons style board game, during which Adam starts to suffer strange hallucinations. From this point on, things get weirder and weirder, with an offbeat, logic-free storyline full of surreal elements that leave one feeling like they've just dropped acid.
Amongst the craziness on offer: a talent show at the Trottelville Junior College in which a variety of terrible acts are met with laughter and applause by the audience; repeated cuts to a man playing with a jigsaw puzzle; Adam killing people, including a fortune teller (not a very good one-she didn't see that coming!) and a woman in roller skates whose footwear is cooked in an oven; a man walking in an out of scenes with a Tic Tac Toe board on his back, which gradually gets filled in; a fat couple visiting the costume shop looking for rabbit costumes; a Punch puppet appearing in the background of numerous scenes; a doctor in a hospital wearing a gorilla suit; a policeman acting like Sherlock Holmes (and his assistant is called Watson); and an organist at a church dressed like Liberace.
The sheer randomness of the film outdoes even the most incomprehensible of French avant-garde cinema, and gives the most schlocky of '80s horror movies a run for their money. For many, this will prove unwatchable; for others, it might well prove irresistible. Whatever your opinion, there's no denying that it's a unique experience. As for writer/director Ota Richter's intent: the film's final shot is a big clue, a close-up of a character (I gave up trying to figure out who) flipping the bird! It would seem that the joke is on those who stick it through to the end in the hope of any kind of logical explanation.
The film begins in 1382 in Canterbury, England, where a wizard is betrayed by a nobleman, and so curses his offspring for generations to come. Cut to Trottelville, USA, 1982, where Adam (Thom Haverstock) and Barbara (Wendy Crewson) work at a costume shop. After hours, they join a few friends for a Dungeons and Dragons style board game, during which Adam starts to suffer strange hallucinations. From this point on, things get weirder and weirder, with an offbeat, logic-free storyline full of surreal elements that leave one feeling like they've just dropped acid.
Amongst the craziness on offer: a talent show at the Trottelville Junior College in which a variety of terrible acts are met with laughter and applause by the audience; repeated cuts to a man playing with a jigsaw puzzle; Adam killing people, including a fortune teller (not a very good one-she didn't see that coming!) and a woman in roller skates whose footwear is cooked in an oven; a man walking in an out of scenes with a Tic Tac Toe board on his back, which gradually gets filled in; a fat couple visiting the costume shop looking for rabbit costumes; a Punch puppet appearing in the background of numerous scenes; a doctor in a hospital wearing a gorilla suit; a policeman acting like Sherlock Holmes (and his assistant is called Watson); and an organist at a church dressed like Liberace.
The sheer randomness of the film outdoes even the most incomprehensible of French avant-garde cinema, and gives the most schlocky of '80s horror movies a run for their money. For many, this will prove unwatchable; for others, it might well prove irresistible. Whatever your opinion, there's no denying that it's a unique experience. As for writer/director Ota Richter's intent: the film's final shot is a big clue, a close-up of a character (I gave up trying to figure out who) flipping the bird! It would seem that the joke is on those who stick it through to the end in the hope of any kind of logical explanation.
There's a lot of thins in this movie that could have come straight out of a David Lynch project- constant shots of a creepy puppet, a mysterious man putting together a puzzle, the director walking through dressed as some sort of a technician with a tic-tac-toe board on his bak.... all really interesting imagery. I think that most of the comments on here are negative because no one even bothers to try and figure out what the hell is going on in this strange film. I really liked it; although my taste runs toward the b-grade genre. The acting is really not great, but there's always something interesting to look at (try to figure out how the tic-tac-toe game is being played) and despite what others have said, the music is great. I won't bother going into the plot here (not sure how well one could sum it up anyway) but I must stress that this is definately worth seeing if you get the chance. If you do watch it, I urge you to take your time and actually try to figure the imagery out; there's a good bit of symbolism at work here and I don't think one should simply write this movie off as awfull without at least thinking it over for a while. I picked it up as an ex-rental for $2 so I can hardly complain. This would actually be nice as a DVD. Seriously.
I rented this film about a dozen times in the late eighties before my video store got rid of it. I wish I was the one to get it. Did I love the film? Yes. Because it is good? No. This film is so outrageously bad, even by bad movie standards. But it doesn't fall into the gray zone of boring bad. It's not bad like other bad films. A million typing monkeys couldn't have come up with a more disjointed script. After reading other reviews, positive and negative, I suspect that a lot of the people who watched it were too stunned to even remember how messed up the continuity was. This is like three bad films in one (at least parts of three bad films, randomly cut together) As far as I remember, it starts off with the story of the friends roll-playing, then they start to die, before anyone figures out what is happening- Adam starts killing some other people, for no apparent reason, then he goes to a party. I won't give away the ending, which comes rather out of left field. In the end I was confused.
Yes, put it out on DVD, it's been too long since I saw it. (I too used to inflict this film on others, watching it is like picking at a scab.) I can't cast a vote, it's awful and great. Please, recommended for weirdo's only.
Yes, put it out on DVD, it's been too long since I saw it. (I too used to inflict this film on others, watching it is like picking at a scab.) I can't cast a vote, it's awful and great. Please, recommended for weirdo's only.
क्या आपको पता है
- कनेक्शनFeatured in The Spoony Experiment: Skullduggery (2011)
टॉप पसंद
रेटिंग देने के लिए साइन-इन करें और वैयक्तिकृत सुझावों के लिए वॉचलिस्ट करें
- How long is Skullduggery?Alexa द्वारा संचालित
विवरण
इस पेज में योगदान दें
किसी बदलाव का सुझाव दें या अनुपलब्ध कॉन्टेंट जोड़ें